Here's a revised version of your article. I've preserved your structure and tone but tightened the language for clarity, professionalism, and engagement, with some adjustments for flow and factual coherence. Let me know if you'd like it to sound more formal, casual, or tailored for a specific audience (e.g., investors, activists, general public):

---

**Trump Moves to Kill \$7B Solar Program, Targeting Biden’s Climate Legacy**

The Trump administration is preparing to dismantle “Solar for All” — a \$7 billion clean energy initiative launched under President Biden to help 900,000 low-income households install rooftop solar panels. The program, funded by the Inflation Reduction Act, was designed to cut electricity bills and carbon emissions, but only \$53 million has been disbursed so far.

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin plans to notify 60 grantees of the program’s termination, dismissing the initiative as a “green slush fund” with inadequate oversight. The decision is enabled by the new *One Big Beautiful Bill*, which gives the administration authority to reclaim unspent climate funds. Former President Trump, who has repeatedly criticized solar and wind as “unreliable,” continues to push for fossil fuels to “unleash American energy.”

This move is part of a sweeping rollback of over 70 Biden-era climate policies, including the lifting of offshore drilling bans and the reopening of coal production.

📉 **Backlash & Legal Uncertainty**

The announcement has sparked immediate backlash. Environmental groups, Democratic lawmakers, and even some Republican-led states like Georgia argue that the EPA lacks legal authority to cancel funds already approved by Congress. Legal challenges are expected, potentially setting the stage for a high-profile court battle over executive power and climate funding.

📊 **Market Impact**

Solar stocks like \$ENPH and \$FSLR are under pressure amid weakening federal support. Meanwhile, fossil fuel and nuclear-related equities — including \$OKLO and \$SMR — are gaining on hopes of accelerated project approvals and deregulation.

💬 **Divided Vision for U.S. Energy**

Supporters of the repeal, mostly conservatives, argue that taxpayer dollars should support “cheap, reliable” energy sources rather than what they label “woke green subsidies.” Critics say the move undermines both climate progress and U.S. leadership on clean energy.

🔮 **What’s Next?**

With most of the funding still untouched, the cancellation could move quickly unless halted by the courts. A successful repeal would slow the U.S. energy transition and could harm America’s climate credibility globally. However, if lawsuits prevail, the program might be restored — though continued legal uncertainty may chill future clean energy investment.

⚖️ The U.S. stands at a crossroads between fossil-fueled independence and a climate-driven energy future — and the path it chooses could reshape the global energy landscape for decades to come.

\#Trump #SolarForAll #ClimatePolicy $BNB #CleanEnergy #EPA #InflationReductionAct $SOL $TRUMP