There are many trading point indicators for #事件合约 in the square, most of them are just indicators. The difference between an indicator and a strategy is that a strategy can be backtested historically; why only provide you with indicators? Because if they give you the strategy for historical backtesting, their win rate would be exposed.

What free tests, what live trading point indicators, what free invitation codes for membership groups, all of it is just indicators!

What can you test in those few days of free testing? The time is too short to be meaningful. And then there are live trading points. When it fails, this indicator is now ineffective, and then they switch time frames. Then they say to adjust this or that again, basically, I would have lost everything with their indicators.

I asked these people why they don't provide strategies. They said historical data is meaningless, and at that moment, I felt like a thousand horses galloping by, what nonsense they dare to say without thinking. They simply don't understand what an indicator is. Having someone write an indicator is just a way to fool people.

Also, writing indicators for oscillation ranges and trend markets, two sets of indicators. It’s all nonsense. The market has to move before it can be determined whether it's a range or trend market; even experienced traders with about a decade of experience can only grasp the probability of whether it's a trading period or a trend market! What’s the point of presenting two indicators, are you going to force them in after the market moves?

Historical data is highly valuable for reference. Most indicators are developed based on historical performance. The win rates generally don't differ too much. Then they fine-tune based on actual performance. They talk about a recent win rate of 70% or 80%. The time is too short. That is completely meaningless. They should present a year's worth of backtesting data before talking! Just presenting indicators to fool people. They only manage to fool those who know nothing.