New Rules of Node Economy: In the Lagrange Network, Integrity is More Valuable than Computing Power
In many blockchain networks, node profitability often relies on 'competing in computing power' and 'comparing hardware', leaving little chance for small players. However, the ZK proof network of Lagrange is completely different: here, nodes stand on 'integrity' and 'technical strength', and can participate by staking LA, earning 'service fees' from real business.
#lagrange Specifically, Lagrange's nodes are mainly responsible for 'generating ZK proofs'. When developers need to verify cross-chain data, handle privacy transactions, or implement AI inference on-chain, they will publish tasks on the network. Nodes that stake LA can participate in bidding; those who can generate proofs faster and more accurately will receive orders and earn fees. More importantly, the network has a strict 'reward and punishment mechanism': honest nodes that complete tasks on time and with high quality receive double rewards; if they slack off or commit fraud, the staked $LA will be deducted (Slashed), resulting in direct asset loss.
#lagrange This mechanism makes the node ecosystem healthier: it abandons 'computing power monopoly' and advocates 'whoever is reliable makes money'. Even small teams, as long as they have strong technology and can optimize proof generation speed, can seize orders from large nodes. Moreover, the types of tasks are rich and diverse: from simple cross-chain state verification to complex zkML inference, nodes can choose based on their expertise without needing to be 'well-rounded'.
For $LA holders, this means more stable income—nodes earn real fees paid by developers, rather than tokens issued by the project party. @Lagrange Official is proving this 'labor distribution' model: the decentralization of Web3 should not be 'dictated by large nodes', but should be 'who creates value gets to share the cake'. #lagrange may be redefining the rules of the 'node economy'.
$LA @Lagrange Official #lagrange
