We need to look at its long-term influence from its token mechanism:
Many of us Alpha players have 'task syndrome':
Do tasks → Claim airdrops → Throw away → Next one
For us, the name of the coin doesn't matter, what's important is 'can we benefit from it'.
But LA is an exception.
The entire system design is not for 'draining traffic + selling goods', but to build a standard network for on-chain cross-chain verification.
For this network to operate, it doesn't rely on hype, but on:
Validators → Callers → Users → Incentivizers
This whole structure can close the loop.
And $LA is the 'only fuel' for this structure.
📌 The role of $LA is not only to incentivize interaction but also to support the operation of the network.
It's not the short-term model of 'interact a bit and issue some coins', but:
✅ User behavior needs to be proven
✅ Projects need to use it to build verification modules
✅ The verification process must be run and maintained by someone
✅ The accuracy of verification must rely on an economic penalty mechanism to be maintained
The entire system relies on $LA operation, which is emphasized repeatedly in official documents, economic models, and Testnet design.
🚨 Why can't it be treated as a task coin?
Task-type coin = Complete interaction → Issue coins → Sell-off → Project popularity declines
Lagrange-type coin = Build economic system → Network verification → Continuous project calls → Value-added cycle
If you are throwing it away now because of 'no big rise'
You might miss out in the future:
When 'on-chain state assets' become the standard, calling incentives gradually rise, verification node income continues to grow, and LA's secondary market liquidity strengthens in that wave of dividends.
🔮 Small prediction: The value trend of LA
Once the mainnet validation nodes start running, the demand for staking, payment from the calling side, and behavior verification standards will form.
It has jumped from 'coin issuance reward' to 'credit assets of the on-chain verification economic system'.
✅ Summary
The true 'task coin' survives on hype;
This kind of 'functional verification coin' survives on calling and verification mechanisms.
When we are still searching for the next task round after round,
Lagrange has already started building the economic framework for the next generation of on-chain behavior verification.
Will you treat it as a task tool or choose to occupy the infrastructure asset in advance?
The decision is yours
