李财之道 蓝鸟会
--
New Paradigm of Node Economy: In the Lagrange Network, Integrity is More Valuable than Computing Power
In many blockchain networks, nodes aim to profit by 'competing on computing power' and 'hardware comparison', leaving little opportunity for small players. However, the Lagrange (#Lagrange ) ZK proof network breaks this pattern: here, nodes rely on 'integrity' and 'technical strength' to establish themselves, with a stake of $LA allowing participation to earn 'service fees' from real businesses.
Specifically, nodes in Lagrange are primarily responsible for 'generating ZK proofs'. When developers need to verify cross-chain data, handle private transactions, or enable AI reasoning on-chain, they publish tasks on the network. Nodes that have staked LA can participate in bidding, and those who can generate proofs faster and more accurately will obtain orders and earn fees. More importantly, the network has a strict 'reward and punishment mechanism': honest nodes that complete tasks on time receive double rewards; if they slack off or commit fraud, their staked $LA will be slashed, directly resulting in asset loss.
This mechanism makes the node ecosystem healthier: it is not a 'computing power monopoly', but rather 'whoever is reliable earns money'. A technically strong small team can still seize orders from larger nodes as long as they can optimize proof generation speed. Moreover, the types of tasks are diverse, ranging from simple cross-chain state verification to complex zkML reasoning, allowing nodes to choose based on their expertise without needing to 'cover all business'.
For holders of $LA , this means more stable income—nodes earn real money paid by developers rather than tokens issued by project parties. @Lagrange Official demonstrates this 'labor distribution' model: the decentralization of Web3 should not be determined by 'big nodes', but rather by 'who creates value gets to share the pie'. #lagrange may be redefining the 'node economy'.
@Lagrange Official #lagrange
In many blockchain networks, nodes aim to profit by 'competing on computing power' and 'hardware comparison', leaving little opportunity for small players. However, the Lagrange (#Lagrange ) ZK proof network breaks this pattern: here, nodes rely on 'integrity' and 'technical strength' to establish themselves, with a stake of $LA allowing participation to earn 'service fees' from real businesses.
Specifically, nodes in Lagrange are primarily responsible for 'generating ZK proofs'. When developers need to verify cross-chain data, handle private transactions, or enable AI reasoning on-chain, they publish tasks on the network. Nodes that have staked LA can participate in bidding, and those who can generate proofs faster and more accurately will obtain orders and earn fees. More importantly, the network has a strict 'reward and punishment mechanism': honest nodes that complete tasks on time receive double rewards; if they slack off or commit fraud, their staked $LA will be slashed, directly resulting in asset loss.
This mechanism makes the node ecosystem healthier: it is not a 'computing power monopoly', but rather 'whoever is reliable earns money'. A technically strong small team can still seize orders from larger nodes as long as they can optimize proof generation speed. Moreover, the types of tasks are diverse, ranging from simple cross-chain state verification to complex zkML reasoning, allowing nodes to choose based on their expertise without needing to 'cover all business'.
For holders of $LA , this means more stable income—nodes earn real money paid by developers rather than tokens issued by project parties. @Lagrange Official demonstrates this 'labor distribution' model: the decentralization of Web3 should not be determined by 'big nodes', but rather by 'who creates value gets to share the pie'. #lagrange may be redefining the 'node economy'.
@Lagrange Official #lagrange
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
7
0