Could you clarify which cryptocurrency you're referring to as “e”? You wrote “e hitting $1 is absolutely insane but totally possible”—and I want to make sure we’re talking about the right token before digging into analysis or price scenarios.
Here’s some context across similarly named assets:
🔎 Analyst Forecasts on “E‑Coin” vs. “eCash (XEC)”
⚫ E‑Coin (ticker: ECN)
Price prediction models suggest it could hit between $70–90 by late 2025, making a $1 milestone comfortably possible under bullish cycles.
For 2030, some projections place it above $100—indicating hitting $1 would be entirely within price norms for this narrative.
⚫ eCash (XEC)
Algorithms and industry analytics suggest eCash would need a 5 million% gain to reach $1—assuming current circulating supply.
Forecasted top price by 2050 remains under $0.00008, meaning $1 feels mathematically infeasible without massive token burns or supply restructuring.
👉 If you meant another token symbol like “E”, “ε” (epsilon), or something else, let me know. With the correct asset, I can break down why $1 might seem crazy—or actually within range—depending on tokenomics, supply structure, and growth roadmap.
#ProjectCrypto #TrumpTariffs #MarketPullback #WhiteHouseDigitalAssetReport #FOMCMeeting