The Role of Opposition Votes in WCT Governance**
In WCT governance, opposition votes are not merely a form of denial, but an important force for optimizing proposals. A certain proposal once planned to increase the staking reward ratio by 50%, but opponents pointed out that this would lead to rapid token inflation, ultimately resulting in the proposal being adjusted to 'phased increases, along with an enhanced destruction mechanism.' Opposition votes prompt proposers to consider ecological balance more comprehensively, avoiding decision-making errors. Data shows that about 30% of initial proposals are modified due to opposition opinions, with the final approval rate increasing to 65%, reflecting the constructive role of opposition votes in consensus formation, making governance results more aligned with actual ecological needs.