Controversies and Consensus Formation in WCT Governance Proposals**
WCT governance is not always passed unanimously; proposals often spark controversy. For example, a certain proposal suggested raising the staking threshold for nodes, which small node holders opposed due to concerns about being eliminated, while large nodes supported it for enhancing network quality. Amid the controversy, the community found a balance through ongoing discussions—establishing tiered staking requirements that ensured node quality while leaving space for small nodes. Ultimately, the proposal passed with a 62% approval rate, reflecting the flexibility of the governance mechanism: allowing for differences to exist, building consensus through communication, and ensuring that decisions uphold overall interests while considering local demands.