Once, I thought the logic of exploiting airdrops was very simple: interact as soon as the project goes live, rush to the leaderboard before the snapshot, and cash out the airdrop at the right time. To earn more, I opened hundreds of small accounts, like an 'arbitrage worker' on-chain, interacting with one project repeatedly dozens of times, thinking this was 'effort'.
Until that day when I checked the project snapshot, entered the address and it popped up: '⚠️ Your wallet does not meet the behavioral quality standards and has been excluded from the airdrop list.' Upon checking, the culprit was Lagrange — now the 'on-chain credit judge' behind many projects.
It's not just about whether you have interactions, but rather using technology to penetrate the essence of behavior:
Traceability: Checking interaction records through SQL (time, contract, frequency, etc.), using ZK technology (Zero-Knowledge Proof) to ensure on-chain data is real, projects can issue rewards or exclude users based on this, the whole process is 'non-falsifiable and trustless'.
Behavior Assessment: Your interactions on-chain are all 'evidence'; short-term exploits (short wallet interaction cycles), falsely acting as LPs (providing liquidity for less than 7 days), no community participation (no governance/holding/proposals), pure speculation (only interacting without retention), mass account creation (multiple wallets from the same IP/path) are all deductions.
Simply put, on-chain data defines whether you are 'qualified', not your self-perception. This set of rules is driven by the Lagrange Coprocessor + Prover network, fundamentally reconstructing the 'real interaction' standards of Web3 with technology.
After calming down, I actually recognize this system:
For projects: Filtering true supporters, avoiding airdrops being exploited by 'exploiters' who snatch away value;
For users: Speaking with on-chain data, replacing 'whoever shouts the loudest is right', fairly rewarding long-term participants;
For the ecosystem: Directly striking against scripts and mass exploitation, purifying the environment.
It's not 'anti-exploitation', but rather turning exploitation into 'sustainable quality behavior' — truly contributing to the project (long-term interaction, participating in governance, retaining assets) deserves to receive airdrops.
Looking at LA (Lagrange ecosystem token) again, it is the 'fuel + governance core' of this system: projects must pay to call for verification, nodes generate proofs to earn rewards, and users may need to stake LA for identity verification and credit repair in the future, ecosystem governance also relies on LA for voting. Saying it is the 'ETH of the Web3 on-chain resume system' is not an exaggeration.
Looking back now, ordinary exploiters need to rethink their strategies: if they are just short-term account spammers or mass arbitrageurs, Lagrange will directly 'judge you out'; however, users who genuinely want to participate in the ecosystem and interact long-term will be rewarded.
Lastly, I want to ask: Can your wallets that are desperately interacting withstand Lagrange's 'on-chain judgment'? Feel free to share your exploitation stories in the comments ~#Web3
