Today, using Wallet A to connect to the NFT platform was smooth.
Tomorrow, switching to Wallet B to connect to DeFi will start to lag, sign errors, and failed redirects.
Switching to Wallet C might just not connect at all...
You think it's a wallet issue, but the essence is: the connection layer standards are chaotic.
👀 Web3 is undergoing a 'connection war'.
Every wallet wants to be the entry point, and every chain wants to define the protocol.
But ultimately, the user experience has become the victim.
I have recently paid special attention to a protocol; it is neither building wallets nor launching chains.
It is doing something more fundamental—unifying the 'protocol layer' for on-chain connection experience.
How does it work?
• A unified standard has been established: whether dApp, wallet, or chain, they all connect according to its protocol.
• Achieved multi-chain + multi-wallet + multi-function (signature, push, chat, session) interoperability.
• Users can go all the way, and developers can hit fewer snags.
• Transforming 'connection' from a chaotic wilderness into 'protocol standards'.
You may have used it long ago, just didn't notice.
Most mainstream wallets and app connection pop-ups are backed by this.
So what is WCT for?
This protocol network runs on relay nodes; in the future, it will need to open nodes, push connection billing, governance proposals, and other operations.
All revolve around a core token: WCT.
This is not a meme, nor is it a coin dumped by an exchange.
It is an 'economic fuel + trust tool' for protocol operation.
The struggle for connection standards seems far from us.
But every time you scan, it fails, the wallet disconnects, or you jump back to the page...
This is the cost of the 'missing connection layer'.
The foundation of future Web3 is not TPS, but 'who can connect'.
Which wallet do you think offers the best experience now?
Do you believe connection standards can solve this 'fragmentation' problem?
Feel free to leave a message to chat👇
