#《It's Okay If You Don't Understand Lagrange, But Pretending to Understand Should Be Out》
What is Lagrange? It's not something you can understand just by posting ten articles and talking about "off-chain verification" a few times.
It's not just a narrative term; it's a complete set of technical systems.
You say Coprocessors are amazing, but do you know how verifiers are deployed?
Do you know how proofs are transmitted back on-chain via ZK?
You don't, right? So on what basis can you keep talking every day?
Lagrange addresses the fundamental issue of on-chain computational efficiency,
by handling heavy tasks through off-chain collaboration, generating zero-knowledge proofs,
and bringing the correctness proof back on-chain, ensuring that all results are reliable, verifiable, and reusable.
This is a system-level innovation, not the source of inspiration for your memes and graphics.
You say you are involved in content creation, so may I ask: what have you created?
Those sentences copied from the white paper? That diagram you didn't understand at all?
True creation is about clearly explaining the technology, thoroughly communicating the value, and making the world understandable.
You haven't said anything; you're just dragging down the rhythm of this movement.
Not learning technology is not shameful,
but pretending to understand and writing about it truly deserves accountability.