#《Lagrange is a technical insistence, not a narrative tool》
Stop treating Coprocessor as a trivial topic for you to gain attention.
Lagrange is conducting real experiments in off-chain computation,
not providing you with materials to post about 'ZK is popular' and 'off-chain verification is cool'.
What is a Coprocessor?
It is a tool that builders actually use,
not something you can represent in depth with just three lines of posts.
It allows you to offload complex computations to off-chain,
and then bring the verified results back on-chain using ZK proof,
improving performance, ensuring security, and reducing costs.
But if you can't even copy this section,
how dare you post daily about 'What is Lagrange'?
You are not educating the community; you are polluting the language.
We write to clear the field.
To clear out those unqualified lecturers, those content machines that are habitual plagiarists,
and everything that uses buzzwords as slogans for hype.