Recently, a revelation has triggered strong reactions in the international public opinion arena: former US President Trump is rumored to have suggested to Ukrainian President Zelensky to launch military strikes on key cities within Russia, including critical areas such as Moscow and St. Petersburg. Although this dialogue has not been officially confirmed by Ukraine, related content has rapidly spread within major diplomatic and military observation circles. The deep logic behind it goes far beyond military significance. Resources are the focus of the game. According to multiple sources, Trump's suggestion was not merely about the outcome of the war, but rather aimed at the strategic resources within Ukraine that have not been fully developed. For instance, lithium, cobalt, and rare earth elements—these minerals are crucial for new energy, electric vehicles, chips, and military manufacturing. In the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, these resources have become the focal point of fierce competition among Western countries, especially under the grand strategic goal of reducing dependence on Asian supply chains, the value of Ukraine's resources is rising significantly. If crossed, the situation could escalate comprehensively. If Ukraine attacks cities within Russia, the situation could spiral completely out of control. Russia has repeatedly stated that it will 'spare no effort' to protect its territorial security.
If the Zelensky government genuinely adopts this suggestion, it could not only provoke a fierce counterattack from Russia but also drag other major powers like NATO into a deeper conflict. This would not be a localized battle but a significant upheaval that could affect the global security structure. Ukraine's dilemma: Zelensky is currently facing a tough choice. On one hand, Ukraine is under severe domestic pressure, and the war is consuming vast resources; on the other hand, it is highly reliant on Western military and economic aid. Should they continue to hold their defensive position, or take the risk to strike? This is not just a military strategy issue, but a profound choice that impacts the fate of the nation and the direction of international relations. Western intentions: Resources, security, and discourse power. Behind this war lies a more complex geopolitical game. Ukraine's abundant mineral resources are becoming a strategic element that the US and European countries aim to control. The related discussions reveal a reality: the war is not just about territory, but also about the competition for resources, discourse power, and industrial dominance. This also explains why Trump's 'suggestion', although seemingly radical, may represent a deep-seated appeal of certain political forces.
The situation is unclear, but the consequences are unpredictable.
Currently, the Ukrainian side has not responded clearly to the related revelations. However, as the war enters a prolonged phase, even the slightest change in the situation could trigger a significant turning point. Is it a risk worth taking, or should they seek balance? Zelensky's next move will become the focus of global public opinion and capital markets.
The world is waiting for answers, and for reason to prevail.$BTC $ETH
