ไธ้ฉฌๅฅ
--
๐งงYesterday (Monday) we traded a total of 2 contract strategies, taking profit on 1 and holding 1.
The first order was a short strategy with a cost of 122200, where we set up 5 hours in advance and successfully took profit on targets 1 and 2 in batches. Please remember that the break-even point of 122200 was never hit and instead dropped overnight. According to the strategy, using 100x leverage resulted in a profit of 100% to 170%!
The second order was a long position on ETH with a combined cost of 2996. Our original plan was to add to our position at 3011 and then escape (with prior setup), but ETH later spiked to 3012 and instantly surged to 3031 (this was the escape plan, but we missed it by 1U) and was recognized by the market maker. Later, we decided to simply sleep and set a buy order at 2928 for a long position, but the intraday low briefly hit 2930, missing it by 2U; otherwise, it would have automatically escaped at 2976. In the end, we decisively placed a market order at 2960 to add to our long ETH position, with the final cost being 2996, and we set it up in advance to automatically break even and escape.
Summary: The best liquidity and trading volume still belong to BTC; it won't play these near-miss games with you. Such situations do occur, but they are rare. As soon as there are too many people hanging orders at one point for Ethereum, smart whales and traders will set their orders slightly ahead to steal liquidity, ultimately completing the hunt for liquidity.
๐ๆๅ้ขๅคๆณขๆฎตๅ็ฉบ่ฎฐๅฝ ๐่ฟไฝฃๅไธคๅคฉๅไบๅ
The first order was a short strategy with a cost of 122200, where we set up 5 hours in advance and successfully took profit on targets 1 and 2 in batches. Please remember that the break-even point of 122200 was never hit and instead dropped overnight. According to the strategy, using 100x leverage resulted in a profit of 100% to 170%!
The second order was a long position on ETH with a combined cost of 2996. Our original plan was to add to our position at 3011 and then escape (with prior setup), but ETH later spiked to 3012 and instantly surged to 3031 (this was the escape plan, but we missed it by 1U) and was recognized by the market maker. Later, we decided to simply sleep and set a buy order at 2928 for a long position, but the intraday low briefly hit 2930, missing it by 2U; otherwise, it would have automatically escaped at 2976. In the end, we decisively placed a market order at 2960 to add to our long ETH position, with the final cost being 2996, and we set it up in advance to automatically break even and escape.
Summary: The best liquidity and trading volume still belong to BTC; it won't play these near-miss games with you. Such situations do occur, but they are rare. As soon as there are too many people hanging orders at one point for Ethereum, smart whales and traders will set their orders slightly ahead to steal liquidity, ultimately completing the hunt for liquidity.
๐ๆๅ้ขๅคๆณขๆฎตๅ็ฉบ่ฎฐๅฝ ๐่ฟไฝฃๅไธคๅคฉๅไบๅ
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content.ย See T&Cs.