#USCryptoWeekCryptocurrencies do not make you free if you do not have control.
$BTC 🔑🔓💥✨✨
#MemecoinSentiment We go to sleep trusting that our cryptocurrencies will remain intact. But what would happen if upon waking up, access was blocked, the application failed, or worse, our funds simply disappeared? In an environment that promotes financial sovereignty, reliance on third parties remains one of the most significant contradictions.
🔸The false sense of security.
In the world of cryptocurrencies, convenience has seduced many. Centralized platforms, such as exchanges, custody applications, or wallets managed by third parties, are offered as 'simple' solutions for the average user. They promise intuitive interfaces, 24/7 support, and impeccable security. However, that apparent tranquility could be the prelude to disaster.
When we delegate our private keys, we are actually ceding total control of our funds. We are no longer owners; we are users with conditional permissions. Recent cases such as the hacking of BingX, the collapse of Atomic Wallet, or the suspension of withdrawals on platforms in crisis remind us that 'secure' funds can disappear in seconds... with no possibility of reclaiming them.
🔸Self-custody: the forgotten principle.
The slogan 'Not your keys, not your coins' is not a maximalist exaggeration. It is a direct and brutal warning. Only those who possess the private keys have real sovereignty. Everything else is delegation and, therefore, risk. Self-custody should be the standard, not the exception.
However, few take on that responsibility. Why? The fear of losing access by mistake, the lack of technical knowledge, or simply laziness work against it. But a dangerous narrative also plays a role: that 'everything is easier if someone else does it.' That comfort comes at a cost, and sooner or later someone pays it. #StrategyBTCPurchase #ETHBreaks3k $ETH
