What traditional profit-seekers fear the most now are probably these two terms:
Kaito and Alpha.
To put it simply, Kaito requires you to hand over your chips in advance, while Alpha requires you to lock your assets and queue for subscription. Both are changing the previous logic of 'free airdrops for everyone.'
It used to be that everyone could share, but now it's — if you don’t have chips, you don’t even have a ticket.
But we can’t blame these mechanisms entirely. To be honest, without Alpha, many projects might still be in the drawing stage, with not even a shadow of the tokens in sight.
And do you really think that if you don’t join Alpha, project parties will give users more airdrops?
Not necessarily. The current landscape of projects is generally such that if they can save, they will save; if they can avoid giving, they will avoid giving.
As for Kaito, it is even more straightforward—it directly concentrates resources in the hands of a small group of people, leaving ordinary profit-seekers with no chance to participate.
But then the question arises—will you take the plunge and join Kaito, or will you continue with traditional profit-seeking, clinging to that possibly shrinking 'base amount'?
This is becoming an increasingly realistic question.
The rules of the profit-seeking game are changing, but how will you choose?
