The BTC trend has already reached a point close to the end. Now, let's take a look back to see if the key defining points set by the main force starting two days ago really are the main force’s points.
"Please look at the candlestick chart!"
All we need to do is mark the points where the main force said it started building high points two days ago and the points where it ended building high points afterward. Do you see anything?
Why is it so coincidentally that the subsequent trend is marked by the main force's points?
In my article, I mentioned the defining points set by the main force before they even happened.
Is this just a coincidence?
The main force has set high points, also known as consolidation, yet the consolidation range just happens to use the points defined by the main force as the high and low points of the range. Is the timing really that coincidental?
Of course, this is not a coincidence. If the main force hadn't told me, how would I know?
So, does this count as speculation on the long side? Or should we wait for the short side?
If I hadn't informed in advance about the defining points set by the main force, then how could I know to use this point as the range when things haven't happened yet?
What about the future?