No use, if the general public is excluded from the current POS mechanism's ETH transaction distribution, what difference does ETH have from SWIFT's interbank telegraph? It's just a voucher and a transaction platform. Moreover, after switching to POS, the open L2 interface trading tokens exploit L1's on-chain infrastructure with low fees, while the general public does not receive the rewards they deserve.

According to PANews, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin pointed out in the article that although ZK-wrapping solves many problems, zero-knowledge proof of identity still has risks, mainly due to maintaining the "one person, one identity" attribute.

He mentioned that using "proof of wealth" for anti-sybil attacks is insufficient in many use cases, requiring an "ID-like" solution. The ideal scenario is a multi-identity system somewhere in between. While difficult to achieve, it comes close and represents the best practical solution. Multi-identity can be explicit or implicit, and its market share cannot approach 100%.