Everyone is criticizing humanity, but the problem with Humanity is not just about the airdrop share.
In fact, the airdrop share may not even be the issue.
Some in the community have calculated that the airdrop shares have not reached the proportions stated in the documentation. Combined with the founder's statement that 'the revolution has not yet succeeded, comrades still need to work hard,' the remaining portion may be distributed in subsequent airdrops.
After all, promotion after TGE is more important.
💠Community
However, the community still needs to be respected and given reasonable explanations, which are currently lacking.
It is said that (Brother Bee has not written about this project or downloaded the APP), users even need to purchase $H tokens in CEX as GAS in order to claim the airdrop... Expensive and troublesome.
Even when claiming the airdrop, it could deduct GAS from the airdrop share, which would make it less costly but less troublesome for users! It’s hard to tell if this shows a lack of attention to the community or if the technology is lacking.
💠Technology
Some people who only have one account were also witch-hunted. Others casually registered and received airdrops worth several hundred dollars.
This indicates that the so-called real-person identification technology of Humanity is questionable.
The project’s official website claims to be open-source, so Brother Bee checked Github, where there are only 2 code repositories, and the latter is a Fork of the Ethereum EVM chain.
The previous one is the token contract, with only 19 code submissions.
No code audit report was found, only an API that can be used to verify whether a certain EVM address has been certified by Humanity's fingerprint authentication. As for non-EVM addresses, they should not be supported at the moment.
Brother Bee has not found any evidence of Humanity's technology or user fingerprints being encrypted with ZK.
💠Community vs Technology
Currently, the market is enchanted by various technologies and products that are not grounded, which is a good thing. However, without technology and products, isn't it just a scheme?
Both technology and community are very important!
For example:
@defidotapp places great importance on community and even conducted a code audit of their token airdrop smart contract. The product has room for improvement, so the user base is relatively small.
Scroll and zkSync have powerful ZK-Rollup technology. However, they do not place much importance on the community; the former even referred to airdrop participants as 'electronic beggars,' which once implicated other ZK projects and caused the $ZK coin price to tumble.
In contrast:
Based on @ParticleNtwrk's @UseUniversalX, the first DEX based on chain abstraction in the entire network, the product has an excellent reputation, and the product is continuously iterating more features, striving to bring users a better product experience. The $Parti airdrop also heavily emphasized the community.
Cross-chain infrastructure @debridge with 25 ecosystem cross-chain instant deposits, a total cross-chain capital of 9.169 billion USD in the past year. Two rounds of airdrops distributed approximately 11 million USD of $DBR to the community.
Technology and community are equally important!
Without technology, there is no sustainable narrative.
Without the community, you lose the people's hearts.
Losing these two, blindly pushing prices may not yield good results. Instead, having technology, product narratives, and community goodwill in pushing prices may yield better results.