What is seigniorage?
'Seigniorage' is an economic concept referring to the net revenues or benefits obtained by the government (or the central bank representing the government) through the issuance of currency. Here, 'tax' does not refer to the conventional sense of taxation (such as income tax, value-added tax, etc., which require legislation and compulsory collection), but to the special financial benefits derived from issuing currency.
Key points for understanding seigniorage:
1. Nominal seigniorage:
The most intuitive understanding: The difference between the face value of currency and its production cost.
Example: A 100 yuan Renminbi note may have a printing cost of only a few dimes or even lower. The central bank manufactures this note at a cost of a few dimes, but when it is put into circulation (for example, through purchasing government bonds, foreign exchange, or lending to commercial banks), the government/central bank obtains purchasing power equivalent to 100 yuan. The difference (close to 100 yuan) is the nominal seigniorage income.
For coins: The difference between the face value of coins and their metal material costs and minting fees.
For base currency (cash + commercial bank deposits at the central bank): The cost for the central bank to create this base currency is extremely low (almost zero), but once it is created and injected into the economic system, the central bank acquires corresponding assets (such as government bonds, foreign exchange, gold, etc.) whose value far exceeds the cost of creating the currency.
2. Actual Seigniorage:
A more essential understanding: The government finances its expenditures by increasing the money supply (printing money), but this leads to currency devaluation (inflation), equivalent to levying a 'tax' on the public's monetary wealth.
Mechanism: When the government pays expenses through the central bank printing money (rather than through taxation or borrowing), the total amount of currency circulating in the market increases. If the growth of goods and services does not keep pace with the increase in money supply, it leads to a general rise in prices (inflation). This means that the actual purchasing power of the cash and bank deposits held by the public decreases.
Equivalent to taxation: The government obtains purchasing power through this method (using newly printed money to acquire actual goods and services), while the public loses part of their wealth due to currency devaluation. This public wealth loss due to inflation is seen as the 'actual seigniorage' levied by the government.
Key: The size of actual seigniorage is closely related to the inflation rate. The higher the inflation rate, the more actual purchasing power the government obtains through money printing (in the short term), but the greater the loss of public wealth.
The main sources and manifestations of seigniorage:
The profits of the central bank are remitted: The central bank generates profits through various operations (e.g., purchasing government bonds, issuing refinancing loans, managing foreign exchange reserves). Many countries' laws stipulate that the central bank must remit most of its profits to the central government after deducting necessary costs and reserves. This portion of remitted profits largely originates from seigniorage.
Financing for the government: When the government faces a fiscal deficit, if the central bank directly purchases government bonds (i.e., monetizing the fiscal deficit), it is equivalent to the government directly paying expenses with newly created money. This directly utilizes seigniorage.
The cost of foreign exchange reserve hedging operations: In countries that enforce mandatory foreign exchange settlement or experience large capital inflows, the central bank needs to purchase foreign exchange while releasing the domestic currency (foreign exchange reserve). To hedge against the inflationary pressure that this domestic currency issuance may bring, the central bank may need to issue central bank bills or increase the reserve requirement ratio to absorb liquidity. Issuing central bank bills and other operations requires interest payments, which can essentially be seen as the cost paid to obtain seigniorage (due to the issuance of domestic currency for purchasing foreign exchange). Net seigniorage income needs to deduct these costs.
The importance and risks of seigniorage:
Importance:
It is an important and relatively low-cost source of revenue for the government (especially the central government).
In special periods (such as wars or severe economic crises), it provides an emergency financing means when regular taxation and borrowing are difficult.
For countries with underdeveloped financial systems and weak tax capabilities, seigniorage may be an important pillar of government revenue.
Risk:
Inflation: Excessive reliance on seigniorage financing is one of the main reasons for hyperinflation (as seen in historical cases like Weimar Republic, Zimbabwe, Venezuela). Governments recklessly print money to meet expenditures, leading to sharp currency devaluation and economic collapse.
Resource misallocation: Funds obtained through money printing may have low efficiency, easily leading to resource waste and investment errors.
Unfairness: Inflation tax (actual seigniorage) is regressive, harming low-income groups and those holding more cash, exacerbating social injustice.
Damaging the independence of the central bank: Excessive financing of fiscal deficits undermines the independence and credibility of the central bank, damaging its ability to control inflation.
Seigniorage is essentially the monopolistic revenue brought by the power to issue currency. It manifests as:
1. Nominally: The difference between the currency's face value and production cost.
2. In practice: The government finances itself by increasing the money supply, leading to a loss of purchasing power for the public due to inflation (i.e., 'inflation tax').
While seigniorage is a source of revenue for the government, excessive reliance on seigniorage, especially as a primary means to make up for fiscal deficits, is extremely dangerous and can easily trigger hyperinflation and economic disasters. A modern, sound fiscal and monetary policy system emphasizes the moderate use of seigniorage and primarily relies on transparent and normative means such as taxation and issuing government bonds to finance the government, with the central bank independently responsible for maintaining the stability of currency value.
1. Minting rights are a means, seigniorage is the core revenue:
Holding minting rights (the power to issue currency) is itself a legal authorization and monopoly status. It grants the government/central bank the ability to create money.
However, seigniorage is the core economic value manifestation of this power. It is the actual economic benefit obtained by the government through exercising minting rights—whether nominally low cost for high purchasing power or actual inflation tax revenue. Without seigniorage revenue, minting rights lose most of their economic significance.
2. Seigniorage is a key source of government financing: For the government, seigniorage is an important, relatively low-cost source of revenue. Especially in cases of weak tax capabilities, underdeveloped financial markets, or emergencies (such as wars or severe crises), seigniorage is often the lifeline for the government to maintain operation or even survival.
The value of minting rights largely lies in their ability to continuously and relatively covertly provide the government with this revenue. From this perspective, the actual value of seigniorage as a revenue outcome indeed exceeds that of minting rights as a form of power.
3. The scale of seigniorage reflects the acceptance of currency and economic strength:
A country's ability to continuously and stably collect seigniorage depends on how widely and deeply its currency is accepted, as well as the overall scale and stability of the economy.
If a currency circulates only in a very small range or if the economic foundation is weak and inflation is out of control, its seigniorage income will be very limited or even negative (e.g., in high-inflation countries, nominal seigniorage income may be eroded by inflation).
The strong ability to collect seigniorage (e.g., the 'international seigniorage' brought by the international status of the US dollar) is a direct reflection of economic strength and monetary credibility, which is far more significant than merely having the legal right to issue currency in one's own country (minting rights). One of the core benefits of dollar hegemony is the huge seigniorage globally.
4. The risks of abusing seigniorage far outweigh the abuse of minting rights themselves:
Holding minting rights does not necessarily lead to disaster.
However, excessive reliance on seigniorage (financing fiscal deficits through excessive money creation) is the main culprit leading to hyperinflation, collapse of the monetary system, economic disasters, and social unrest. Countless painful historical lessons (Weimar Germany, Zimbabwe, Venezuela, etc.) have proven this point.
Therefore, how to manage and constrain the use of seigniorage is a thousand times more important than merely claiming to possess minting rights. The enormous potential destructiveness of seigniorage inversely proves its extreme importance (whether in terms of positive revenue or negative risks).
Why can't we completely sever or simply think 'seigniorage is more important'?
1. Minting rights are the premise and foundation of seigniorage:
Without statutory, exclusive minting rights, there can be no discussion of seigniorage. Minting rights are the institutional guarantee and source of power for the existence of seigniorage. Losing minting rights means seigniorage can no longer be discussed (unless it is international currency, but the status of international currency also stems from the strong comprehensive national power of its issuing country and trust in that country's minting rights).
2. The institutional design of minting rights determines the nature and constraints of seigniorage:
Who holds the minting rights (government or independent central bank)?
What laws and systems constrain the exercise of minting rights (e.g., prohibiting central banks from directly purchasing government bonds, inflation targeting, etc.)?
These institutional designs directly determine whether seigniorage is used prudently or abused. A well-designed, independent central bank system with clear goals is crucial to prevent the excessive appropriation of seigniorage by the government, which could lead to inflation.
3. The minting authority also encompasses broader monetary management functions
Minting rights are not just the power to print banknotes; they typically also include the formulation and execution of monetary policy, management of payment and clearing systems, and maintenance of financial stability. These functions are crucial for the healthy operation of the economy, and their value cannot merely be measured by seigniorage revenues.
Minting rights are the 'hilt of the sword,' and seigniorage is the 'blade' and its 'dual nature.'
Minting rights are the legal foundation and institutional framework granted by law.
Seigniorage is the core economic revenue generated from exercising that power (and also the core source of risk).
'Seigniorage is more important than minting rights,' its profound meaning lies in:
1. Economic substance outweighs legal form: Seigniorage reveals the true economic dynamics and distribution of interests behind the issuance of currency.
2. Risk awareness: The enormous temptation and destructiveness of seigniorage remind us that constraints on minting rights (especially on the use of seigniorage) are crucial. Having minting rights is just the starting point; how to manage it responsibly and sustainably (controlling the scale and use of seigniorage) is the real challenge and core issue.
3. Strength manifestation: The scale and stability of seigniorage revenue (especially for international currencies) are key indicators of the actual value of a country's monetary sovereignty and macroeconomic strength, which are more persuasive than mere legal documents.
Therefore, a more accurate statement might be:
Minting rights are a necessary foundation, but seigniorage (its revenues, risks, and management) is the core issue and key point. Ignoring the temptations and risks of seigniorage while merely emphasizing the possession of minting rights is a reversal of priorities. Historically, the core challenge of modern monetary policy is the separation of minting rights (the power to issue currency) from seigniorage (the actual revenues from issuing currency). Such separations are not uncommon and often arise from political division, technological limitations, institutional design, or external intervention. Below are several typical types and specific cases:
1. Power fragmentation under feudal division
Case 1: Medieval Europe (especially the Holy Roman Empire)
Background: The Holy Roman Empire's imperial power weakened, with many princes in power.
Separation mechanism:
Nominal attribution of minting rights: The emperor nominally holds the highest minting rights (Regalian Right).
Actual minting rights are decentralized: Local lords, churches, and autonomous cities obtain actual minting rights through charters (or by overstepping).
Attribution of seigniorage: Local entities (rather than the emperor) obtain seigniorage revenue (e.g., the difference between currency face value and metal cost).
Consequences:
Chaotic monetary system (varying purity and weight), hindering trade.
The emperor cannot concentrate financial power through seigniorage, weakening central authority.
Substantially: Minting rights are 'subcontracted,' and seigniorage flows to local areas, leaving only nominal power to the central authority.
2. The 'Free Minting Rights' System in the Era of Metallic Currency**
Case 2: Free Minting of Gold and Silver Coins (e.g., 19th Century Gold Standard Countries)
Background: Under the gold standard, the government allowed individuals to send gold and silver ingots to the mint for free (or at low cost) to be minted into coins.
Separation mechanism:
Attribution of minting rights: The state monopolizes the operation of mints (holding technical minting rights).
Attribution of seigniorage: Private holders (rather than the government) obtain seigniorage revenue!
Reason: The government only collects very low fees (or even free), and seigniorage (face value - cost) is embedded in the metal value of currency, obtained by private providers of gold and silver.
Substantially: The government actively relinquishes most of the seigniorage, transferring it to private entities to maintain currency credibility and the free circulation of gold and silver.
3. Forced separation under colonial/semi-colonial systems
Case 3: 'Foreign Currency Circulation' and 'Customs Duties' in Late Qing to Republican China
Background: Foreign powers invade China, sovereignty is lost.
Separation mechanism:
Foreign currencies dominate circulation: Mexican pesos, British trade dollars, and other foreign silver dollars circulate widely in China.
Attribution of seigniorage: Foreign governments (e.g., Mexico, Britain) obtain seigniorage revenue because their silver dollars are exchanged for physical resources in China at costs below face value.
Customs duties (accounting taels): Although not physical currency, as a customs taxation accounting unit, it is controlled by the British-managed customs. Its value is linked to silver, but the pricing and settlement rights are in the hands of foreign tax officials, effectively stripping China of control over key accounting units.
Consequence: China loses monetary sovereignty, seigniorage flows out, fiscal resources are eroded.
Case 4: French African Colonies (Franc Zone, 1945-present)
Background: The West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) and the Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) led by France.
Separation mechanism:
Nominal attribution of minting rights: Regional central banks (e.g., BCEAO, BEAC) have the power to issue the African Franc (CFA franc).
Actual control and distribution of seigniorage:
1. Foreign exchange reserve custody: Member countries must deposit 50% of their foreign exchange reserves into the French treasury 'operating account.'
2. French guarantees and intervention rights: The French Treasury provides 'unlimited guarantees' but holds veto power over the monetary policy of regional central banks.
3. Disputes over seigniorage attribution:
Nominally: Regional central banks obtain seigniorage (by issuing currency to purchase assets).
In essence: Huge foreign exchange reserves in France generate income (managed by France), and France indirectly influences policies through guarantees and intervention rights. A substantial portion of seigniorage revenues (especially from foreign exchange reserves) flows to the French system.
Substantially: Minting rights are 'shared' under the French institutional framework, but seigniorage revenues are substantially divided by the foreign exchange reserve mechanism.
4. 'Technical Separation' under Modern Central Bank System
Case 5: Currency Board System (e.g., Hong Kong)**
Background: Hong Kong implements a linked exchange rate system, with the monetary base requiring 100% backing by US dollar reserves.
Separation mechanism:
Attribution of minting rights: The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issues Hong Kong dollars.
Attribution of seigniorage: Limited and passive:
The HKMA must purchase equivalent dollar assets (e.g., US Treasury bonds) when issuing Hong Kong dollars.
Seigniorage is reflected in the interest income from HKMA's holding of US dollar assets, which, after deducting operational costs, is attributed to Hong Kong's treasury.
Key limitation: Unable to actively create money for government financing (i.e., cannot levy traditional 'inflation tax').
Substantially: Minting rights are subject to strict asset anchoring constraints, and seigniorage is only the investment income from foreign exchange reserves, with the ability to levy actively stripped away.
Case 6: Eurozone (European Central Bank System)
Background: The supranational currency Euro is jointly managed by the European Central Bank (ECB) and various national central banks.
Separation mechanism:
Attribution of minting rights: The ECB holds the decision-making power over monetary policy (core minting rights), while national central banks are responsible for execution (e.g., issuing banknotes).
Distribution of seigniorage:
1. Profit distribution in the Euro system: The ECB and various national central banks generate profits (i.e., seigniorage) through monetary policy operations (e.g., purchasing bonds).
2. Distribution rules: Profits are distributed according to the contribution ratios of each country's central banks in the ECB (approximately reflecting GDP and population weights).
3. Key point: Governments cannot directly request their central banks to finance their deficits (monetization of fiscal deficits is prohibited).
Substantially: Minting rights are exercised at the supranational level, and seigniorage is distributed to member state central banks according to fixed rules (ultimately flowing to each country's finance), but no single country can independently control the collection of seigniorage.
Summary: The essence and implications of the separation model
1. Power fragmentation (feudalism): The central authority loses control over local minting rights → seigniorage is appropriated by local entities.
2. Institutional transfer (free minting/currency board): The government voluntarily relinquishes the collection of seigniorage (or only receives limited benefits) to maintain currency credibility/stability.
3. Erosion of sovereignty (colonies): External forces forcibly deprive monetary sovereignty → seigniorage is appropriated by the suzerain or foreign capital.
4. Supranational mechanism (Eurozone): Countries cede monetary sovereignty to supranational institutions → seigniorage is shared according to agreements, but independent collection capacity is lost.
The separation of minting rights and seigniorage essentially reflects incomplete or intentionally constrained monetary sovereignty. History shows that this separation, if stemming from external oppression (e.g., colonization) or internal power loss (e.g., feudal fragmentation), often leads to economic chaos and a decline in national strength; while separation based on voluntary institutional design (e.g., currency boards, Eurozone) sacrifices policy autonomy for monetary stability.
The unified exercise of minting rights and seigniorage remains the core foundation for modern sovereign states to maintain economic autonomy. That is, while ensuring the independence of minting rights, effective systems must be established to constrain the use of seigniorage, ensuring the stability of currency value. Transparent and normative means such as taxation and issuing government bonds are used to finance the government, while the central bank independently maintains the stability of currency value.
ETH BTC
