WLF valuation hits 2 billion USD, but Trump quietly cashes out? There are hidden secrets behind this 'stablecoin drama'.

Just as the circulation of WLF stablecoin USD1 skyrocketed and its valuation approached 2 billion USD, the Trump family quietly reduced their stake in the company—from 75% down to 40%. A total of 35% of shares were liquidated, potentially exchanging for as much as 135 million USD in real cash.

This matter was not publicly announced, but only updated on the WLF official website regarding shareholding information. An exclusive disclosure from Forbes brought this 'quiet cash-out' to light.

Meanwhile, since the launch of USD1 stablecoin in March this year, its market value has soared past 2.1 billion USD, making it one of the fastest-growing stablecoins in the crypto industry. It is reported that the Abu Dhabi MGX Fund even plans to use USD1 to complete a 2 billion investment in Beian—this is a solid political and crypto financial marriage.

Trump operates WLF shares through his controlled DT Marks DEFI LLC and disclosed that he earned 57.4 million USD from the WLF project during 2024, and this cash-out of only 20% shares could potentially add another 100 million to the books.

What’s more exciting is that this involves not just business competition, but also 'political warfare':

On one side, Trump promotes stablecoin policies, claiming he wants to make the beautiful country the 'world capital of cryptocurrency';

On the other side, Warren and others loudly accuse MGX trading of 'corruption', harshly criticizing this operation as a 'conflict of interest'.

Amid this regulatory quagmire, WLF's issuance speed has shown no signs of slowing: the token WLFI + stablecoin USD1 has raised 550 million USD, with its market value skyrocketing, almost replicating the path of Circle's rise back then.

The story of WLF is not just about the rise of a coin, but a version of 'Game of Thrones' in the crypto world.

In this situation filled with macro expectations and mingled political and business struggles—do you think Trump's 'high-position reduction' is a hedge or a move for the next game?