X not happy with socialFi methinks. . . | lex_node on Binance Square

Trending Articles

Bookmarked and Liked

--

X not happy with socialFi methinks. . .

Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.

0

0

Explore the latest crypto news

⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto

💬 Interact with your favorite creators

👍 Enjoy content that interests you

Email / Phone number

Relevant Creator

@lex_node

Explore More From Creator

The thing is, @sreeramkannan as a computer scientist with a philosophy bent understands crypto much better than vast majority of people and founders. You can see he talks about it very differently--in terms "credible commitments" etc. Iykyk, this is the *real* value prop of crypto. Unfortunately this also means Eigenlayer and its value prop is somewhat esoteric for most people to understand, which is probably why they're moving in the direction of building out the apps themselves (e.g. EigenCloud) rather than just being a protocol/platform. What I'd love to see is them squarely address equity vs. token value accrual because if it were clear I'd probably load up on $EIGEN, but right now too hard to tell. . .

--

MetaLeX ⚡️cyberCorps funding 💸app updates, per your popular requests: 1. new issuer type (non-U.S. entity) and round compliance strategy (Regulation S) added for both SAFE and SAFE/Warrant rounds: 2. click "duplicate deal" to spawn a new deal with the same terms (ensuring round uniformity): 3. improved hub views for founders: 4. improved portfolio view for investors: Less obvious: --many backend changes to let us add new/custom deal types very quickly Coming very soon: -->SAFT -->SAFTE Coming pretty soon: -->accredited investor certification -->true 'round' functionality Coming soon-ish -->form your cyberCORP in-app rather than bringing your own Remember, your investors get NFTs representing their investments--you can toggle transferability on and off & let your stockholders participate in the emerging cybernetic economy. MetaLeXio 🖖😎

--

MetaLeX ⚡️cyberCorps funding 💸app updates, per your popular requests: 1. new issuer type (non-U.S. entity) and round compliance strategy (Regulation S) added for both SAFE and SAFE/Warrant rounds: 2. click "duplicate deal" to spawn a new deal with the same terms (ensuring round uniformity) 3. improved hub views for founders: 4. improved portfolio view for investors: Coming very soon: -->SAFT -->SAFTE -->any custom deal types you want (contact us!) Coming pretty soon: -->accredited investor certification -->true 'round' functionality Coming soon-ish -->form your cyberCORP in-app rather than bringing your own Remember, your investors get NFTs representing their investments--you can toggle transferability on and off & let your stockholders participate in the emerging cybernetic economy. MetaLeXio 🖖😎

--

for securities, there is actually no 'liquidity problem' that is solved or substantially helped solely by tokenization liquidity is primarily a legal/regulatory problem, secondarily a business problem (e.g. why let real markets decide your valuation when private markets can pump it?), and only thirdly a liquidity/market mechanisms problem (maybe could be helped by AMMs and other DeFi stuff, or 24/7 trading infra, etc.). . . crypto can however help a ton with programmability/composability, governance, deal making, etc. naturally L1s and L2s and DeFi apps will be most interested in trying to get stonks that *trade actively onchain* (this pumps MEV, REV, helps justify performance-based L1 / L2 marketing metrics, etc.) and will try to fund/subsidize that aspect (including even hand-holding companies to IPO), but imo it's a bit of a red herring, real value unlock for securities is programmability. . .

--

for securities, there is actually no 'liquidity problem' that is solved or substantially helped solely by tokenization liquidity is primarily a legal/regulatory problem, secondarily a business problem (e.g. why let real markets decide your valuation when private markets can pump it?), and only thirdly a liquidity/market mechanisms problem (maybe could be helped by AMMs and other DeFi stuff, or 24/7 trading infra, etc.). . . crypto can however help a ton with programmability/composability, governance, deal making, etc. naturally L1s and L2s and DeFi apps will be most interested in trying to get stonks that *trade actively onchain* (this pumps MEV, REV, helps justify permance-based marketing metrics, etc.) and will try to fund/subsidize that aspect (including even hand-holding companies to IPO), but imo it's a bit of a red herring, real value unlock for securities is programmability. . .

--

Latest News

Bitdeer Expands Convertible Senior Notes Offering to $330 Million

--

Nicholas Wealth Introduces Crypto Income ETF with Tidal Investments

--

3iQ Launches XRP ETF on Toronto Stock Exchange

--

BTC/USDT,ETH/USDT and SOL/USDT Lead Binance USD-M Perpetual Futures Market in Trading Volume Over the Past 24 Hours

--

Crypto News: Crypto Funding Rates Signal Neutral-to-Bearish Market Sentiment on June 18

--

Trending Articles

🚨Tomorrow is the most important day for crypto

Why Does Crypto Crash? A Simple Breakdown

China’s central bank throws weight behind new, emerging global currency system

#BinanceAlphaAlert 🚨 BREAKING 🚨 No more point farming on

SOL/USDT (Bearish Breakdown Acceleration) Technical Analysis, Price Prediction and Trade Plan

Cookie Preferences

Cookie Preferences