#币安Alpha理财中心
#SGCTGE
#sgc
#fly
Currently, the alpha is not just a simple trade score brushing, it's a bit of a manipulation of human nature. In the early stages, there were studios acting as shields, no doubt about it, but where are they now? It's purely a manipulation of psychology. I hope those who are fated can pay attention to this post.
First, is alpha really related to studios?
This question is quite fundamental. Let's make an assumption: if there were no studios, would the threshold increase? From a human nature perspective, without studios, the threshold would indeed increase. The increasing process might be the current process; the bonus period is over, it's time to harvest. Now, regarding the second question about studios, without studios, would the profits increase? Fantasies are useless; current data proves everything: 100-80-70-60-50-40. Even without studios, the profits will still continue to decline.
Second, are the projects launched after going live really through various assessments?
The projects currently launched by alpha can no longer be described as trash; even the growth team's donkeys wouldn't dare to crash the market like this. However, the projects selected by alpha have repeatedly refreshed the bottom line, and when they drop, it's a non-standard joy, extremely capricious! The bottom line of the drop is not the bottom line of the project. Dropping two times in one day, four times in two days, it's comparable to playing contracts! Alpha's strict selection, whoever buys gets hurt.
Currently, the two problems facing alpha's strict selection are: studios are no longer the scapegoats, and the coin listing standards of strict selection are also filled with doubts. If airdrops turn into a game of fast running, what is the significance of coin listing? Theoretically, you can't have both fish and bear's paws, but let's not break the jar in despair. I don't have any good suggestions either; after all, as a retail investor, I can only make a bit of money. I just hope that one end is good enough.
