First, the studio cannot rotate funds, as the associated risk control risk is too high.

I saw this suggestion on Twitter today, and at first glance, I thought it made some sense. However, considering the bright sunshine today, I feel it's not quite right. If everyone is restricted like this, the result will only be that everyone can only receive a meager fee of around 10 U each time.
So I would like to offer a personal suggestion for reference:
1. Directly enforce point deduction for airdrops to prevent someone from deliberately not leading to higher scores (of course, the consequence is that those who receive worthless tokens may complain).
2. Refer to the previous Binance plan, where high scores directly benefit while low scores take turns.
3. Directly implement phased airdrops, for example, divide into three tiers of 230, 220, and 210 points, distributing different amounts of tokens based on scores, and then deduct points in increments of 15, 10, and 5.
4. Airdrop at scheduled intervals, for instance, starting at 230 points, and then decreasing by 5 points every two hours until all tokens are distributed or a certain time limit is reached (this can effectively prevent low-scoring individuals from wanting to receive but being unable to, while high-scoring individuals can receive but look down on it, leading to an awkward situation where scores keep rising).