😐 Recently, I rarely browse X, because the page is filled with monotonous "score-boosting content".

During the limited time I spend on Twitter, more and more people are attacking @KaitoAI, and it seems that everyone is starting to join the new lineup @Cookiedotfun.

———⚠️⚠️⚠️———

If Kaito's original intention was to improve info to enhance the quality of link content and economic efficiency, then its current direction is gradually going astray.

Content is becoming more and more "shallow" because, in order to gain points, everyone is starting to create the “template emotions” that are easiest for the algorithm to capture.

In this process, objectivity and authenticity are sacrificed, and the algorithm is guiding KOL discourse towards uniformity, increasingly resembling an attempt to please the platform rather than serve the readers. 🤖

———🆚🆚🆚———

We compared @Cookiedotfun, and it seems to have provided a different start.

First, the conclusion:

1. Kaito's business design is better; the team has essentially captured all profitable aspects.

From the project's perspective, it needs to spend hundreds of thousands at Kaito to find KOLs for events, to the long-term economic sustainability of KOL content cycles, and then to the product's subscription monetization, the entire path is already running very smoothly.

2. Cookie's product is more solid; it is a platform that anyone can use to check project sentiment indices objectively.

If Kaito is a product for projects and KOLs, then Cookie is an infoFi product for a broad audience. It integrates social heat, KOL trends, on-chain behavior, and interaction data, attempting to make a comprehensive assessment.

It doesn't seem to be about "forcing a sense of presence", but rather aims to make some quantifiable signals more valuable as references.

Its positioning is essentially an overall panel designed for retail investors and market participants, which naturally leans more towards objectivity and reliability than the mechanism of writing content "for the sake of the scoring system".

At least for now, its data structure appears to be cooler and more aggregated. 🎯

Of course, the Snap points system may also incentivize the issue of "content formulaicness" in the future. Under the driving force of interests, whether artificially generated info (like tweets) can maintain sufficient fairness and objectivity is an eternal challenge. ♾️

But ultimately, where Kaito and Cookie's products will end up still depends on what essential problems they are solving. 🔍 (This article does not consider the premise of the secondary market).

——🤔🧠 Whose algorithm is better? ——

I don't consider myself a KOL, and my sample size of followers is not large enough.

However, just from the panels of Kaito and Cookie, Cookie's data collection indeed seems to be more comprehensive.