0xMay
--
A little suggestion for the Alpha product manager
Actually, it's pointless to criticize the Alpha Point rules at this stage. I believe no exchange would want to offend the majority of users and provoke public anger. Perhaps the product manager was misled by bad actors... 😂
First, it should be known that it's almost impossible to filter out studios because they have the funds to invest in scoring and nurturing accounts. In the past, during testing phases of projects like 毛圈, with unknown returns and years of cycles, they managed to persist in interaction. Not to mention Alpha, where scoring guarantees airdrop opportunities.
The original intention of setting rules was to prevent fake users from taking advantage, but later it ended up filtering out real users, leaving only big accounts and studios. Now Alpha has moved from positive incentives to the situation of 'unable to accept large amounts of wear and tear, thus disqualifying'.
First, it should be known that it's almost impossible to filter out studios because they have the funds to invest in scoring and nurturing accounts. In the past, during testing phases of projects like 毛圈, with unknown returns and years of cycles, they managed to persist in interaction. Not to mention Alpha, where scoring guarantees airdrop opportunities.
The original intention of setting rules was to prevent fake users from taking advantage, but later it ended up filtering out real users, leaving only big accounts and studios. Now Alpha has moved from positive incentives to the situation of 'unable to accept large amounts of wear and tear, thus disqualifying'.
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
0
0