I’m personally a holder and investor in $ASTR

I believe in its potential growth only from a technical perspective.

All the updates, partnerships with Sony, the Sonium blockchain, and so on — they’ve brought zero actual impact on the chart.

Just like always in crypto: too many words, not enough results — at least for investors.

Yes, on a global scale they’re doing great — mass adoption, solid tech, presence in the Asian market — it all sounds good.

But let’s be honest — I’m here, like most of you, for profit from the ticker, not usage statistics or backend adoption by some tech teams.

Now, here’s the part that really concerns me:

They’re trying to change their tokenomics for the third time. And to me, that’s a major red flag.

Here’s why:

Why does every project that launches a token (which isn’t even always necessary — you can build blockchain tech without a token) spend years in development but still fail to come up with a clear and solid tokenomics plan from the start?

Why do they always end up changing it later?

It looks like this:

A massive token supply is distributed to early investors and funds.

As the unlocks kick in, they dump the price into the ground.

Then you end up with so many tokens on the market that to reach any reasonable valuation again, the market cap would need to be absurdly high.

But no one is injecting that kind of liquidity anymore.

Then the devs get “creative” — they pull out the classic dumb formula:

“Let’s just reduce the supply so the price per token increases. Then we’ll hype it up with some announcements.”

And boom — another round of tokenomics changes.

That’s exactly what this looks like. 😉