#CryptoRegulation Crypto regulation in 2025 is a hot mess of progress, pushback, and political drama. In the U.S., the SEC, under Paul Atkins, is working on new rules for crypto tokens classified as securities, aiming to clarify guidelines for issuance, custody, and trading while allowing broker-dealers to handle non-securities like Bitcoin and Ether. However, a major bipartisan bill, the GENIUS Act, meant to regulate stablecoins, crashed in the Senate (48-49 vote) due to Democrats’ concerns over Trump’s family crypto ventures, like World Liberty Financial and American Bitcoin, which are seen as potential conflicts of interest. Critics, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren, worry these ties could enable corruption or foreign influence, with calls for investigations and a new bill, the End Crypto Corruption Act, to ban officials and their families from issuing crypto assets. Meanwhile, pro-crypto sentiment is strong, with industry players like Binance’s CEO predicting “enlightened” U.S. regulations by August, fueled by Trump’s push to make America the “crypto capital.”Globally, the UK is tightening its grip, with the FCA planning to ban retail investors from buying crypto with borrowed funds (e.g., credit cards) and aligning crypto firms with traditional financial regulations under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Cryptoassets) Order 2025. This aims for transparency and consumer protection but has sparked concerns about stifling innovation. The EU’s MiCA regulation is already enforcing strict stablecoin oversight, potentially pushing users toward censorship-resistant “dark stablecoins.” South Korea’s also cracking down, with new rules effective June 1 to curb shady crypto sales and tighten AML controls.The crypto community’s split—some see regulation as a path to legitimacy, others as a threat to decentralization. X posts reflect this, with optimism about a U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and DeFi roadblocks clearing, but also fears of overreach killing innovation. Data’s murky, but Bitcoin’s price surge past $100,000 suggests
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content.See T&Cs.