I used to define myself as Palu, but now I'm starting to reflect.

In the previous post, there were a lot of people breaking down in the square. Retail investors are retail investors; let's see whether I count as one.

Summary of characteristics of retail investors given by AI inside and outside the circle

1. Small scale of funds

Twitter: Single transaction amount is small (from a few thousand to several hundred thousand RMB)

Baidu: Narrowly defined as individual investors with very small amounts of funds (such as tens of thousands), engaging in scattered trading.

Broadly: all individual investors, regardless of the amount of funds, can be considered retail investors, and individuals are in a weak position in the market.

2. Reliance on public information, emotions are easily influenced

3. Lack of a team, relying on personal judgment with limited influence

Based on the above, the standard for retail investors is derived. To brush up Alpha points, holding a position of 1000U (a few thousand RMB) is considered standard; scores keep rising, and players keep competing. Whether this retail investor is affected and also rolls up is a question.

After my post on the 29th set the threshold at 80, it led to a roll to 195 points. How many people truly absorbed this? Didn't we say emotions are easily influenced?

This is the points statistics from an internal group of a prominent figure last night (May 5th). 94 people participated in the statistics, and more than half were above the 137 qualifying line that day.

The lucky draw that hasn't been counted yet; if Binance can give that score, it means this score is within a reasonable range.

Do big players also have to take it? Not necessarily; without brushing points, they can still be eliminated. Phyrex is an example; today (May 6th), he stated he only has 112 points. If you say this super influencer counts as a retail investor, I have nothing to say.

If it really can roll up to 200 points later, it means there's still profit to be made. If there are no gains, then it's time to stop. If you lack this awareness, what are you even doing?

Isn't this market always pursuing opportunities and speed?

In this Alpha e-sports event, every method and efficiency affects the outcome.

In my article, I also provided a real option: cut losses. But if this is not acceptable and that is not acceptable, wanting to take without giving is simply unrealistic; the wolves are many and the meat is few. What do you want me to say?

A bitter pill to swallow; studying medicine doesn't save the world. I often reflect on whether my straightforward speech is too direct and whether a little more tact could recover some of the lost merit 😉