#AltcoinETFsPostponed #AltcoinETFsPostponed

Postponed: Strategic Vision or Regulatory Fear?

With the increasing institutional interest in the world of digital currencies, the focus is no longer limited to "Bitcoin" and "Ethereum" only. Attention is now turning towards alternative currencies (Altcoins) like Solana, Polkadot, and Avalanche. Despite the growing demand from investors to launch ETF funds based on these currencies, U.S. regulatory authorities, particularly the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), have decided to postpone the approval of many of these funds. However, is the postponement merely a regulatory precaution? Or is it a hidden strategy with deeper economic and geopolitical dimensions?

Is there a "Political Order" for digital currencies?

It's rare to discuss the idea that there is a "political order" for digital currencies, where certain currencies are marketed and adopted gradually according to global economic priorities. For example, the Bitcoin ETF was passed after years of waiting, while the Ethereum ETF is still in the approval queue. As for alternative currencies, despite their technical development, they are always placed in the waiting category.

Could regulatory authorities be waiting for a mature regulatory environment that allows for the introduction of alternative currencies under a stricter system before allowing them to be traded widely in public markets?

Deferred Altcoin ETF funds

The postponement of investment funds freezes part of the institutional liquidity that was supporting emerging blockchain projects. $BTC

{spot}(BT