When a text message from a local police station suddenly pops up on your phone, you find that the 200,000 U you deposited in Bitget has been marked as funds involved in the case - this absurd drama is happening to more and more people.

The game behind the incident is textbook-level:

1. Judicial fast lane in a remote county: Bitget's government relations department specifically targets a southwestern mountainous county, taking advantage of the local judicial resources scarcity and high pressure of assessment indicators to quickly promote the case

2. Chain freezing black technology: first use virtual currency real-name authentication information to penetrate your WeChat/Alipay, and start from small village banks when freezing (such banks usually do not notify customers in advance)

3. Double deterrence tactics: not only the jurisdiction of the assets is settled, but also the case is filed in your registered residence, and you may be invited to "drink tea" directly when you go home for the New Year

The most fatal thing is not the legal procedure itself, but the time cost trap: in the 6-12 months when the funds are frozen, the money you spend on lawyers may be higher than the principal refund, not to mention that some places may turn your transaction records upside down for tax inspections.

In the face of this systematic harvesting routine, truly smart players have long seen through two survival rules: either cut all accounts into bulk guerrillas when depositing funds (each transaction does not exceed 50,000), or prepare three years of transaction vouchers to fight a protracted war at any time. Remember, the exchange's "compliance declaration" may be for the regulators to see, but the sickle that harvests you has always been real.