#BitcoinWithTariffs

The relationship between Bitcoin and tariffs is a complex issue that reflects the tensions between traditional economics and the emerging world of cryptocurrencies. Tariffs, like the import taxes recently imposed by some governments, create uncertainty in global markets, affecting both traditional assets and cryptocurrencies. In the case of Bitcoin, we have seen initial drops in its price following tariff announcements, such as the 5-10% drop reported in April 2025 after trade measures from the United States. However, I believe that this short-term volatility does not overshadow Bitcoin's long-term potential.

On one hand, tariffs can undermine confidence in fiat currencies like the dollar, especially if they trigger inflation or economic instability. This is where Bitcoin could shine: its decentralized nature and limited supply (21 million coins) position it as an attractive alternative to inflationary monetary systems. Some experts, like those cited in financial media, suggest that Bitcoin could become a safe haven, similar to gold, if trade policies erode the dollar's dominance as a reserve currency.

On the other hand, we must not ignore the risks. Tariffs increase the cost of mining equipment, much of which comes from countries like China, which could hit the Bitcoin industry in regions dependent on these imports, such as the U.S. Furthermore, the increasing correlation between Bitcoin and stock markets implies that, in times of economic panic, Bitcoin does not always act as a completely independent asset but may fall alongside the stock exchanges.

In my opinion, although tariffs create short-term turbulence, they reinforce the narrative of Bitcoin as an asset that challenges centralized control. For investors, this suggests an opportunity: to buy during the drops caused by fear, but always with a long-term vision and awareness of the risks. Bitcoin is not immune to global economic policies, but its value proposition—freedom, scarcity, and resilience—strengthens in a world where government decisions generate increasing uncertainty.