This content contains potentially risky contract addresses
Cryptolady Bug
--
On March 11, 2025, a Twitter user named Ripple_queen made a bold claim in a community post: “$XRP
XRP WILL BE SUPPORTED BY THE $2953.62 PRICE OF GOLD.” This single line ignited a firestorm in the crypto world, particularly among XRP enthusiasts. People began buzzing on social media, trying to decipher what it could mean.
Was XRP, the digital currency from the XRP Ledger, about to be pegged to gold at that precise price? The number, $2,953.62, was so specific that it had people wondering if something big was on the horizon. Hashtags like #Ripple and $XRP XRPArmy spread the post quickly.
The tweet sparked immediate conversation. Some users got excited, imagining XRP being linked to gold, which could potentially lead to a significant value increase. Another user offered a different perspective, arguing that XRP didn’t even need gold because it’s already tied to tangible assets like tokenized real estate.
They gave an example: a $5 million house, when tokenized into XRP, would hold that property’s value during a transaction. It was a solid argument about how the XRP Ledger works with real-world assets, which only added fuel to the debate.
Questions started flooding in. One user asked #Ripple_queen, “Who’s saying this? I’d love to believe it, but where’s the proof?” Others speculated if Ripple, the company behind XRP, had some hidden plan. The exactness of that gold price left people intrigued, but no one could figure out where it came from. The discussion quickly gained momentum, with some users excited, while others remained skeptical.
However, cracks soon began to appear. A quick search on Google or through Ripple’s official pages revealed no mention of XRP being linked to gold at $2,953.62, or anywhere near it. Twitter users began calling it out as baseless, with no evidence to support the claim.
The mood started to shift. Crypto fans became frustrated, labeling Ripple_queen’s statement as nothing more than empty noise. The community began urging everyone to be cautious and verify information. #RippleUpdate
XRP WILL BE SUPPORTED BY THE $2953.62 PRICE OF GOLD.” This single line ignited a firestorm in the crypto world, particularly among XRP enthusiasts. People began buzzing on social media, trying to decipher what it could mean.
Was XRP, the digital currency from the XRP Ledger, about to be pegged to gold at that precise price? The number, $2,953.62, was so specific that it had people wondering if something big was on the horizon. Hashtags like #Ripple and $XRP XRPArmy spread the post quickly.
The tweet sparked immediate conversation. Some users got excited, imagining XRP being linked to gold, which could potentially lead to a significant value increase. Another user offered a different perspective, arguing that XRP didn’t even need gold because it’s already tied to tangible assets like tokenized real estate.
They gave an example: a $5 million house, when tokenized into XRP, would hold that property’s value during a transaction. It was a solid argument about how the XRP Ledger works with real-world assets, which only added fuel to the debate.
Questions started flooding in. One user asked #Ripple_queen, “Who’s saying this? I’d love to believe it, but where’s the proof?” Others speculated if Ripple, the company behind XRP, had some hidden plan. The exactness of that gold price left people intrigued, but no one could figure out where it came from. The discussion quickly gained momentum, with some users excited, while others remained skeptical.
However, cracks soon began to appear. A quick search on Google or through Ripple’s official pages revealed no mention of XRP being linked to gold at $2,953.62, or anywhere near it. Twitter users began calling it out as baseless, with no evidence to support the claim.
The mood started to shift. Crypto fans became frustrated, labeling Ripple_queen’s statement as nothing more than empty noise. The community began urging everyone to be cautious and verify information. #RippleUpdate
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
6.3k
0