gasfees

$LINEA #Linea #Ethereum #GasFees #Layer2 #DeFi @Linea.eth
Linea continues to refine how Ethereum scaling should feel — low cost, predictable, and user-friendly. While maintaining full EVM equivalence, Linea’s gas model introduces key optimizations that stabilize fees and make cost estimation transparent for both users and developers.
🟣 1️⃣ The Foundation — Ethereum’s EIP-1559, Perfected
Linea inherits Ethereum’s EIP-1559 gas structure:

total fee = gasUsed × (base fee + priority fee)
But unlike Ethereum, the base fee stabilizes around 7 wei, thanks to Linea’s throughput and block design. Each block uses only ~50% of the 2 billion-gas limit, ensuring no volatile spikes.

When the network’s base fee drops to 7 wei, it can’t decrease further (since 12.5% of 7 < 1 wei). That subtle floor creates predictable, ultra-low transaction costs that rarely fluctuate.
So while Ethereum users often chase gas volatility, Linea’s remain nearly flat — an architectural calm in a market full of storms.
🟢 2️⃣ Dual-Layer Cost Composition — L2 + L1 Harmony
Your total Linea transaction involves:
Layer 2 cost → the execution fee, same logic as Ethereum gas.Layer 1 cost → the expense of publishing compressed transaction data (blobs) on Ethereum for security.

Linea abstracts both through its rollup logic, giving you one unified gas figure. The sequencer dynamically accounts for data submission to Ethereum while keeping execution fees consistent.
The result? Transparent finality, Ethereum-secured — without you ever juggling L1 or L2 parameters.
🟡 3️⃣ Gas Estimation Simplified — linea_estimateGas
Instead of relying on the vanilla eth_estimateGas, Linea offers a purpose-built API:

linea_estimateGas → returns precise values for:
gasLimitbaseFeePerGaspriorityFeePerGas
It’s simulation-accurate, mirroring the sequencer’s block-building policy. This ensures your transaction’s priority fee is exactly enough for inclusion — no guesswork, no failed transactions.
Typical response:

→ Base fee: 7 wei | Gas limit: 53 000 | Priority fee: 0.07 Gwei

≈ $0.01 per transaction — a fraction of Ethereum’s cost.
🔵 4️⃣ Inside the Formula — Adaptive Variable Cost
Linea embeds fee metadata in each block’s extraData field, including:
FIXED_COST (0.03 Gwei) for infrastructureADJUSTED_VARIABLE_COST — the real-time per-byte data cost of sending blobs to EthereumETH_GAS_PRICE for compatibility
The variable cost evolves automatically using this formula:
ADJUSTED_VARIABLE_COST = max(base_variable_cost, previous_variable_cost × (1 + delta / 32))
where delta measures calldata congestion.

If calldata use surges, costs rise exponentially to deter spam — doubling roughly every 22 blocks under extreme load — ensuring DoS resilience without penalizing normal users.

When congestion drops, the cost gently decays back to baseline.
Linea effectively self-heals against spam, sustaining low-fee access for honest participants.
⚫ 5️⃣ Economics of Stability — Profit Margin & Sustainability
Every fee unit accounts for Ethereum blob data, node operation, and network sustainability through a profit-margin multiplier. This ensures validators and sequencers remain economically secure while maintaining user-friendly pricing.
The mechanism’s fine-tuning guarantees Linea won’t collapse into fee starvation — a problem that crippled many cheap-gas chains. Here, cost = stability.
💰 6️⃣ Practical View — Real-World Cost Benchmarks

Linea routinely delivers < $0.02 per action, even during peak hours — proof that scalability doesn’t require sacrificing decentralization.
🌍 7️⃣ Why It Matters — The Linea Philosophy
Ethereum built the foundation of decentralized trust; Linea’s mission is to make that trust affordable and frictionless.

By minimizing volatility and aligning incentives between sequencers and users, Linea doesn’t just replicate Ethereum — it amplifies it.
Developers get predictability.

Users get usability.

The ecosystem gets sustainability.
Linea’s gas model is more than an engineering fix — it’s an economic philosophy of fairness and efficiency.
🧠 Dr. Nohawn’s Reflection:
Gas is the silent tax of innovation. Most chains treat it as an annoyance; Linea treats it as an opportunity — to prove that efficiency is elegance.

By turning volatility into predictability, it doesn’t just cheapen transactions; it restores confidence in what decentralized infrastructure can feel like.

Where others chase hype, Linea optimizes the invisible — the quiet math that makes Web3 usable for the next billion people.

Ethereum solidified its position as the top blockchain in 2024 by generating $2.48 billion in fee revenues. However, this strong performance in fees contrasted with the underwhelming price action of ETH during the same period.
In total, Layer 1 and Layer 2 blockchains collectively earned nearly $6.9 billion in transaction fees in 2024.
Ethereum Maintains Leadership Despite Upgrades
According to a CoinGecko report, Ethereum’s fee revenues rose by 3% compared to $2.41 billion earned in 2023.
Despite the Dencun upgrade in March 2024, which lowered transaction costs on Layer 2 solutions, Ethereum continued to dominate fee revenues. The migration of users from the Layer 1 mainnet to Layer 2 solutions did not hinder its strong market position.
Monthly revenues for Ethereum ranged from $62.82 million to $606.77 million throughout the year. The blockchain's most profitable quarter in two years was the first quarter of 2024, generating $1.17 billion, nearly half of its annual fee revenue. This surge was driven by airdrop initiatives and heightened on-chain activity.
Other Blockchains: Tron and Solana on the Rise
Tron ranked second in fee revenues, earning $2.15 billion in 2024—a staggering 116.7% increase from $922 million in the previous year. This growth was largely driven by the expanded use of stablecoins, with Tron’s monthly earnings hitting $342.54 million in December 2024.
Solana experienced the highest percentage growth, with its fee revenues skyrocketing by 2,838% from $25.55 million in 2023 to $750.65 million in 2024. This surge was fueled by increased transaction activity, which even caused network congestion in April 2024. Solana’s monthly revenues peaked at $197.5 million in November 2024.
Bitcoin and BNB Chain: Modest Growth
Bitcoin saw its fee revenues grow by nearly 16%, while BNB Chain recorded an 8.7% increase. Although these gains were more modest, they were still significant. Bitcoin’s growth was supported by innovations such as Ordinal NFTs, BRC-20 tokens, and the development of Rune tokens.
Conclusion: Ethereum Remains Dominant
Despite competition and changes within the ecosystem, Ethereum has proven its ability to remain a dominant force among blockchains. Its fee revenues far outpaced those of other blockchains, reaffirming its central role in the crypto industry. However, the rise of Tron and Solana highlights the rapidly evolving market and the emergence of new players.

#blockchain , #Ethereum , #gasfees , #nft , #ETH

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“