cryptohistory

🧬 Introduction: Ethereum’s Origin Story

In 2015, while Bitcoin was dominating the headlines, a 21-year-old named Vitalik Buterin launched a revolutionary idea: a decentralized blockchain platform not just for money — but for everything. Ethereum ($ETH ) introduced smart contracts, allowing developers to build decentralized apps (dApps) on a global, censorship-resistant network.

---

📅 Ethereum Timeline: Key Milestones

🏁 2015 – Genesis Block

Ethereum Mainnet launched on July 30, 2015

Starting price: ~$0.75 per ETH

Market cap: Under $100M

⚙️ 2016 – The DAO Hack & Ethereum Classic

A smart contract bug in “The DAO” led to a $60M hack

Community voted to hard fork and recover funds

Result: Two chains emerged — Ethereum (ETH) and Ethereum Classic (ETC)

🚀 2017 – ICO Boom

Ethereum became the engine for thousands of Initial Coin Offerings

Price exploded to $1,400+ in January 2018

Powered growth of projects like Chainlink, BAT, and OMG

📉 2018–2019 – The Crypto Winter

ETH dropped to ~$80 amid market crash

Developers kept building through the bear market

Ethereum became the backbone of DeFi experimentation

🔥 2020–2021 – DeFi and NFT Explosion

Uniswap, Aave, Compound, and others led the DeFi revolution

Ethereum processed billions in smart contract volume

NFTs minted via Ethereum (CryptoPunks, Bored Apes) went mainstream

⚙️ 2022 – The Merge

Ethereum transitioned from Proof of Work to Proof of Stake

Known as “The Merge,” this upgrade cut energy use by 99.95%

Paved the way for scalability and sustainability

💡 2023–2025 – L2 Scaling and Institutional Adoption

Layer 2s like Arbitrum, Optimism, and zkSync boosted speed and lowered gas

ETH integrated into ETFs, hedge funds, and global payments

Staked ETH crossed 30 million, securing the network and rewarding holders

💡 Why Ethereum Matters

Ethereum isn’t just a coin — it’s an ecosystem. It powers:

🌐 dApps across finance, gaming, art, and social media

💸 Stablecoins like $USDT and $USDC

🔐 DAOs and decentralized governance

🖼️ NFTs and digital ownership

🚀 L2 networks bringing mass adoption closer

📊 ETH by the Numbers (as of June 2025)

💰 Price: ~$3,600

🔒 Staked ETH: 31.2 million

🌎 Validators: Over 1 million

⚡ Avg daily transactions: 1.3M+

🔗 TVL in DeFi (on ETH L1 & L2): Over $100B

📈 What’s Next for Ethereum?

Proto-danksharding & full sharding (2025–2026)
→ Will boost transaction speed & reduce gas costs

More DeFi integration with TradFi

Sovereign nations experimenting with Ethereum-based infrastructure

🔚 Final Thoughts: Ethereum Is the Infrastructure of the Future

Ethereum started as a dream — now it’s the digital foundation of a new financial world. From DeFi and NFTs to DAOs and L2s, Ethereum continues to evolve faster than any tech in history.

This isn’t just a cryptocurrency — it’s a movement.
$ETH #Ethereum #ETH #CryptoHistory #defi #BlockchainRevolution

Found this fossil from The Guardian, dated October 18, 2011. BTC had crashed from $33 to under $2. Mining was uneconomical, botnets were doing the heavy lifting, and Paul Krugman was already writing obituaries.
“The value of Bitcoins… has plummeted across exchanges – to a level where it costs more to ‘mine’ them than they are worth.”
“It’s an endless cycle of stupidity that simply cannot be solved by human nature.”“The biggest weakness about Bitcoin was that… their apparent value was based on small numbers of transactions within a small group.”
MTGox was in full clown mode. Someone dumped 400,000 coins, nuked the price to one cent, and the exchange just… unplugged itself. Classic 2011 energy.
Krugman chimed in, saying:
“What we want from a monetary system isn’t to make people holding money rich… the Bitcoin economy has in effect experienced massive deflation.”
Meanwhile Surowiecki casually dropped this:
“The vast majority of bitcoins are held by people hoping to sell them to other people.”
So basically, not much has changed.
But here's the kicker: back then, there were only 7.48 million coins mined. Network hash rate was falling. Everyone thought the experiment was over. And yet, the whole thing kept crawling forward like a rat in a sewer, unglamorous, mostly forgotten, but alive.
t’s 2025. The tickers are green (not today, but sometimes), the candles are tall (when they feel like it), and most still have no real grasp of the technology behind it. But in 2011, when Bitcoin slipped under two dollars, nobody talked about inflation hedges or monetary revolutions. They were selling their GPUs on forums and calling it a failed experiment.
And still, the chain kept ticking. Nobody fixed it. Nothing was fixed. It just kept working anyway. Just blocks. One after another. Like nothing happened.
That’s the whole story. The rest is just commentary.
#CryptoHistory #2011

Before USDT, before “fully backed” became a tagline, there was BitUSD. It launched in 2014 on BitShares, a project shaped by Dan Larimer, who had a habit of building complex systems with clear internal logic and limited adoption. BitUSD was the first serious attempt to create a dollar-pegged cryptocurrency. No banks were involved, no fiat reserves were held anywhere. The peg came from crypto itself, using BTS tokens locked into smart contracts to simulate a one-dollar value.
It was algorithmic, not in the sense of automation, but in the way it attempted to hold parity without direct fiat support. The system relied on overcollateralization, voluntary interaction, and incentive balancing. The mechanism was sound enough, the code existed, but liquidity was minimal and the broader market was indifferent.
In 2014, crypto users were not looking for something stable. They were looking for leverage, movement, and stories. BitUSD offered a synthetic store of value, but no one wanted to store anything. It had no presence on major exchanges, no integration with centralised tools, no earning potential through staking or yield. It functioned, yet remained unused.
That same year, a project called Realcoin quietly rebranded as Tether. It took a different approach. For every USDT issued, there would be one US dollar held somewhere in a bank account. No complex game theory, no on-chain balancing, just a simple promise. Traders didn’t ask where the dollars were or who audited them. What mattered was that it worked. In 2015, Tether appeared on Bitfinex and began moving across accounts quickly. It settled trades. It felt familiar. It became useful.
BitUSD was a system. Tether was a tool. One required belief in decentralised logic, the other required belief in infrastructure. The market made its choice.
Algorithmic stablecoins, like BitUSD or later UST, attempt to replicate fiat stability through on-chain logic and locked collateral. They do not depend on a central issuer, and they are vulnerable when demand or confidence shifts. Custodial stablecoins, like USDT and USDC, are backed by real assets held by central entities. They are simpler to understand, easier to use, and more compatible with existing exchanges and wallets.
By 2025, Tether still dominated offshore volumes and exchange liquidity, but it was no longer available everywhere. Regulations, particularly in the European Union under MiCA, had already begun to restrict access. Some users could not even open a Red Packet containing USDT, let alone move it into a funding wallet. Tether was not gone, but it was fenced off. BitUSD, on the other hand, had disappeared completely. It was not delisted. It had never been listed.
It did not fail because of a technical flaw. It failed because it never reached the point where users cared. It was too early, too abstract, and too isolated. Being first is only meaningful if someone follows. And in this case, no one did.

#CryptoHistory #Stablecoins

BNB trades at around 670 today, a figure that can sound impressive or irrelevant, depending less on the number itself and more on how far back one's memory reaches, how clearly one recalls the structure it belongs to, and how closely one observed the choices made around it, not just when, but why.
It was never just another token. Even in its quieter periods, BNB remained a functional part of an ever-expanding system that did not rely on daily headlines to justify its presence. It reduced trading fees, opened doors to token launches, became the default fuel for one of the more active blockchains, and gradually embedded itself in mechanisms that rewarded both activity and stillness, depending on the season.
The dates below are not declarations of discovery. They are merely waypoints, pulled from charts that can be verified by anyone with a TradingView tab open and five minutes to spare. A few cents may be off, the cursor may have drifted, but the idea is not to be exact. It is to remember.
December 2018, price at $4.06

Post-collapse, post-enthusiasm, post-most-things. There was little to say and less to expect. A 200 dollar buy here brought 49 BNB. That position today would be worth over 33,000 dollars, without staking, without leverage, without anything particularly clever. Just holding something that already had a purpose, even if nobody felt like discussing it at the time.
March 2020, price at $6.66

Markets everywhere were in retreat, risk was broadly unwelcome, and the safest strategy seemed to be to wait things out. A 200 dollar buy meant 30 BNB. That, too, became over 20,000. Not because of a contrarian thesis or secret knowledge, but simply because one held a token that kept being used while the noise was elsewhere.
June 2022, price at $188.71

The LUNA collapse had left scorched ground in its wake. Liquidations were ongoing, and retail participation had shrunk to a kind of passive watchfulness. A 200 dollar purchase yielded just over one BNB. That single unit now stands at roughly 710. Modest, but intact. No hype, no drama, just position.
October 2023, price at $200

By then, BNB was not new, not misunderstood, and not particularly cheap. But it was stable, integrated, and still evolving. That same 200 dollars, held through today, would have grown to 670. A quieter return, but in line with the token’s nature: measured, incremental, and supported by infrastructure.
In the periods between these entries, the system kept working. Launchpads continued, Earn products ran their cycles, on-chain volume rose and fell. Some holders staked, others did not. Airdrops happened, sometimes based on snapshots, sometimes by counting balances day after day. Either way, the pattern was consistent: those who benefited were not necessarily loud, or early, or bold. They were simply there.
Everyone talks about conviction, but often only in hindsight. In reality, most outcomes come from a combination of structure and time, or in this case, from being part of something that continued to function, and having the patience to let it.
A personal note
When I first encountered BNB, it was already a token with history. I arrived in 2024, long after the early chapters had been written. The price was no longer symbolic, the entry no longer casual. With a modest buy, I acquired less than two BNB, just enough to participate, just enough to notice how different it feels to step into a house that is already built, furnished, and inhabited.
This piece was not written out of envy for those who came before, nor as a complaint about the price of entry. On the contrary, it is a gesture of respect toward those who recognised value before it was obvious, and who accumulated not because the world told them to, but because the system made sense to them.
Today, buying BNB is not easier. In fact, it is harder in every way: economically, psychologically, emotionally. You buy less, and it costs more. But you still buy into the same thing, a structure that continues to function. If there is solidarity in this, let it be with those arriving now, not to speculate, but simply to belong.
$BNB #CryptoHistory #BNBHODLerAirdrop

🚨 The Largest Cyber Heist in Bangladesh’s History

In February 2016, hackers pulled off one of the biggest financial cyber heists in history, stealing $81 million from the Bangladesh Bank’s account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The attack was so sophisticated that it took months to uncover the full extent of the breach.

✔️ Hackers infiltrated Bangladesh Bank’s systems, gaining access to its SWIFT network.

✔️ They sent fraudulent transfer requests, moving millions to accounts in the Philippines.

✔️ The stolen funds were laundered through casinos, making recovery nearly impossible.

This wasn’t just another bank hack—it was a geopolitical financial attack.

💰 The Heist – How Hackers Stole $81 Million

🚨 Hackers installed malware in Bangladesh Bank’s systems, monitoring transactions for weeks.

🚨 They sent 35 fraudulent SWIFT requests, attempting to steal nearly $1 billion.

🚨 Due to a typo in one request, $920 million was blocked, but $81 million still went through.

This attack wasn’t about quick profits—it was a calculated move to exploit global banking vulnerabilities.

🔥 The Exposure – The Aftermath of the Heist

✔️ Bangladesh Bank discovered the breach days later, but the money was already gone.

✔️ The stolen funds were traced to casinos in the Philippines, but only a fraction was recovered.

✔️ Investigators linked the attack to North Korean hackers, specifically the Lazarus Group.

This case wasn’t just another cybercrime—it was a direct challenge to global financial security.

⚖️ The Aftermath – A Warning for Financial Institutions

🚨 Banks must strengthen cybersecurity, as SWIFT attacks are becoming more common.

🚨 Regulators are pushing for stricter oversight, aiming to prevent future financial breaches.

🚨 North Korea’s cyber operations are evolving, proving that global banking remains a key target.

This heist wasn’t just about money—it was a geopolitical move with massive implications.

🔮 Lessons Learned – What This Means for the Future

🚨 Cybersecurity is now a top priority for financial institutions, as attacks grow more sophisticated.

🚨 Blockchain transparency can expose hidden financial operations, proving that no entity is truly anonymous.

🚨 The battle between cybersecurity and cybercrime is intensifying, and Bangladesh was caught in the crossfire.

The story of Bangladesh’s $81M bank heist isn’t just speculation—it’s a real case that exposed vulnerabilities in global finance.

#BangladeshBankHeist #CyberCrime #BANGLADESH #CryptoHistory #Write2Earn 🚀

🚨 The Rise of Crypto Kidnappings – A New Threat

In May 2025, a wealthy crypto investor, Michael Valentino Teofrasto Carturan, was kidnapped and tortured for 17 days in his $40,000-a-month Manhattan townhouse. His captors wanted access to his Bitcoin wallet, which allegedly contained $28 million.

✔️ The kidnappers used brutal methods, including electric shocks and threats with a chainsaw.

✔️ They forced Carturan to smoke crack cocaine, trying to break his will.

✔️ Despite the torture, he refused to give up his private keys, eventually escaping.

This wasn’t just another crypto crime—it was a terrifying real-world attack on digital wealth.

💰 The Kidnapping – How It Happened

🚨 Carturan was targeted because of his public crypto investments, making him an easy mark.

🚨 The attackers ambushed him in his home, turning it into a torture chamber.

🚨 After 17 days, he managed to escape, leading to the arrest of his captors.

For years, crypto crime was limited to online hacks, but now, it was spilling into the real world.

🔥 The Exposure – The Aftermath of the Attack

✔️ Authorities arrested the kidnappers, charging them with assault and attempted extortion.

✔️ Crypto security experts warned investors, advising them to keep their holdings private.

✔️ Insurance companies began offering policies for crypto kidnappings, recognizing the growing threat.

This case wasn’t just another Bitcoin theft—it was a wake-up call for crypto security.

⚖️ The Aftermath – A Warning for Crypto Investors

🚨 Crypto’s anonymity makes it attractive for criminals, but it also raises ethical concerns.

🚨 Regulators are tightening security, making laundering more difficult.

🚨 Blockchain transparency can expose hidden financial operations, proving that no entity is truly anonymous.

This scandal wasn’t just about money—it was a defining moment for crypto’s role in real-world crime.

🔮 Lessons Learned – What This Means for the Future

🚨 Crypto security must improve, as physical attacks are becoming more common.

🚨 Regulation is evolving, making it harder for criminals to escape justice.

🚨 Blockchain transparency is both a strength and a weakness, as it can expose criminals but also be exploited.

The story of Michael Carturan’s crypto kidnapping isn’t just speculation—it’s a real case that revealed the dark side of crypto crime.

$BTC

#CryptoKidnapping #BitcoinCrime #CyberSecurity
#CryptoHistory #Write2Earn 🚀🔥

🚨 The Heist: A $243M Bitcoin Scam Turns Into Chaos

In one of the most bizarre crossovers between digital crime and real-world violence, a group of cybercriminals stole nearly $243 million in Bitcoin. Within weeks, the fallout spilled into a quiet Connecticut suburb, ending in a harrowing kidnapping plot.

✔️ A Washington, D.C.-based crypto investor received a suspicious phone call, with scammers posing as security representatives from Google and Gemini.

✔️ Using social engineering tactics, they convinced the victim to download software, giving them remote access to his computer.

✔️ Moments later, 4,100 Bitcoin vanished from his wallets, worth $243 million at the time.

But that was just the beginning.

💰 The Kidnapping: Crypto Crime Turns Physical

🚨 One of the thieves, Veer Chetal, was identified through leaked Discord videos, where the group celebrated their heist.

🚨 Just a week later, Veer’s parents were kidnapped, ambushed while house-hunting in their Lamborghini Urus.

🚨 Authorities described Veer’s parents as victims, with no indication they were involved in the crypto theft.

The attackers dragged the couple into a van, bound them with duct tape, and fled the scene.

🔥 The Exposure: How Crypto Detectives Unmasked the Thieves

✔️ Blockchain investigator ZachXBT traced the stolen funds, linking them to a mysterious wallet.

✔️ Independent analysts tracked the money across dozens of exchanges, notifying platforms to freeze the assets.

✔️ A leaked video revealed the thieves celebrating, accidentally exposing their real identities.

The crypto world may seem like the Wild West, but it has its sheriffs.

⚖️ The Aftermath: A Warning for Crypto Investors

🚨 Crypto crime is evolving, with digital theft now leading to real-world violence.

🚨 Social engineering remains a major threat, proving that even experienced investors can be tricked.

🚨 Blockchain transactions are permanent, making it possible to trace stolen funds years later.

This case isn’t just another crypto scam—it’s a chilling reminder that digital crime can have real-world consequences.

🔮 Lessons Learned: Can Crypto Ever Be Truly Safe?

🚨 Never reveal your crypto holdings publicly—it makes you a target.

🚨 Use multi-layered security—hardware wallets, cold storage, and personal safety measures.

🚨 Stay aware of emerging threats—crypto crime is evolving fast.

The story of the $243M Bitcoin heist isn’t just a cautionary tale—it’s a reminder that crypto’s greatest strength can also be its greatest weakness.

#CryptoHeist #BitcoinScam #CryptoKidnapping #CryptoHistory #Write2Earn 🚀🔥