Week
2,389 views
11 Discussing
Hot
Latest
$BEL
Trading is getting bore. I know and you probably that we "long lovers" are trap in the Bear đť market. but one thing I love about #binance is word of the week.
and I sold today word.
would you like to "know " #word of the #week please Comments and follow and I will share it as soon as possible after a great response.
Trading is getting bore. I know and you probably that we "long lovers" are trap in the Bear đť market. but one thing I love about #binance is word of the week.
and I sold today word.
would you like to "know " #word of the #week please Comments and follow and I will share it as soon as possible after a great response.
See original
When trading, be sure to protect your personal privacy information. No matter what trading platform you use, you should ensure that comprehensive security measures are taken and double verification is completed. Never easily provide personal or financial information to unidentified individuals or websites. Be sure to maintain a high level of security awareness and immediately be vigilant when encountering requests for transfers or remittances. At the same time, when using social platforms such as Line, WeChat or Telegram in daily life, be cautious when joining unfamiliar netizens and groups. #wex #WEEK
See original
#week #ĐžŃŃайОŃка
â In general, the short-term wait for the weekly TF worked perfectly, I think :)
âI remind you that the main option is indicated in red/green (Either immediately or with a rollback), blue is the level of logical cancellation of waiting, and alternatives at key points are in gray.â
â ď¸ Don't forget about the risks.
Best regards @lucky_trades_finder
â In general, the short-term wait for the weekly TF worked perfectly, I think :)
âI remind you that the main option is indicated in red/green (Either immediately or with a rollback), blue is the level of logical cancellation of waiting, and alternatives at key points are in gray.â
â ď¸ Don't forget about the risks.
Best regards @lucky_trades_finder
#week #ОМиданио
#binance #Bitcoin #BTC
â Hello everyone, you need to accept your mistakes, but sometimes itâs not pleasant to do so, especially when youâve been right at key points for a long time :)))
â Although the medium-term alternative monthly wait is not bad. (where I wrote: In the medium term I expect the buyer to resume after the BTC test (BackToCreek)), but still, to begin with, I expected a test that did not happen and the buyer went without it. There's nothing you can do about it, that's the risk.
â Although short-term intraday waiting on Friday (I donât trade or run a channel on weekends) worked well, itâs still a countertrend.
â But in general, Iâm not happy with myself, and hereâs why: Contextually, the price for older TFs (day, week) was in the area of ââpotential interest of the seller. And everyone observed the impact of this fact; the price could not break through this area for a long time.
â Indirectly, it was clear that there was pressure on the sales area during the day, and the sellerâs protection was getting worse and worse. Next, a trivial impulse breakdown of the sellerâs area occurs. For me, these are ordinary situations that I have seen hundreds of times, but this is my mistake.
â I did not take into account the strong nature of the movement, it was impulsive, and the corrections were flat, + the exhaustion of the sellerâs protection caused the pressure.
In general, in this vein, expecting a test of the BackToCreek level (Breakout Area) before the breakdown of the key sales area was a mistake.
â This is the mercilessness of recoilless movements, you expect normal development (with corrections, etc.), but this does not happen, and you simply stand out of position and miss the movement. On such a movement, you need to enter either very skillfully on junior TFs using early tests of local actions, or on a breakout of bad manipulation (the logic of continuation of the impulse, I will not focus on this, this is not what Iâm talking about now)
âłď¸ In general, according to the weekly TF, I will think like this (see screenshot), but I will reduce the probability to 55-60%.
Best regards @lucky_trades_finder
#binance #Bitcoin #BTC
â Hello everyone, you need to accept your mistakes, but sometimes itâs not pleasant to do so, especially when youâve been right at key points for a long time :)))
â Although the medium-term alternative monthly wait is not bad. (where I wrote: In the medium term I expect the buyer to resume after the BTC test (BackToCreek)), but still, to begin with, I expected a test that did not happen and the buyer went without it. There's nothing you can do about it, that's the risk.
â Although short-term intraday waiting on Friday (I donât trade or run a channel on weekends) worked well, itâs still a countertrend.
â But in general, Iâm not happy with myself, and hereâs why: Contextually, the price for older TFs (day, week) was in the area of ââpotential interest of the seller. And everyone observed the impact of this fact; the price could not break through this area for a long time.
â Indirectly, it was clear that there was pressure on the sales area during the day, and the sellerâs protection was getting worse and worse. Next, a trivial impulse breakdown of the sellerâs area occurs. For me, these are ordinary situations that I have seen hundreds of times, but this is my mistake.
â I did not take into account the strong nature of the movement, it was impulsive, and the corrections were flat, + the exhaustion of the sellerâs protection caused the pressure.
In general, in this vein, expecting a test of the BackToCreek level (Breakout Area) before the breakdown of the key sales area was a mistake.
â This is the mercilessness of recoilless movements, you expect normal development (with corrections, etc.), but this does not happen, and you simply stand out of position and miss the movement. On such a movement, you need to enter either very skillfully on junior TFs using early tests of local actions, or on a breakout of bad manipulation (the logic of continuation of the impulse, I will not focus on this, this is not what Iâm talking about now)
âłď¸ In general, according to the weekly TF, I will think like this (see screenshot), but I will reduce the probability to 55-60%.
Best regards @lucky_trades_finder
See original
#week #ОМиданио
#binance #Bitcoin #BTC
â Hello everyone, you need to accept your mistakes, but sometimes itâs not pleasant to do so, especially when youâve been right at key points for a long time :)))
â Although the medium-term alternative monthly wait is not bad. (where I wrote: In the medium term I expect the buyer to resume after the BTC test (BackToCreek)), but still, to begin with, I expected a test that did not happen and the buyer went without it. There's nothing you can do about it, that's the risk.
â Although short-term intraday waiting on Friday (I donât trade or run a channel on weekends) worked well, itâs still a countertrend.
â But in general, Iâm not happy with myself, and hereâs why: Contextually, the price for older TFs (day, week) was in the area of ââpotential interest of the seller. And everyone observed the impact of this fact; the price could not break through this area for a long time.
â Indirectly, it was clear that there was pressure on the sales area during the day, and the sellerâs protection was getting worse and worse. Next, a trivial impulse breakdown of the sellerâs area occurs. For me, these are ordinary situations that I have seen hundreds of times, but this is my mistake.
â I did not take into account the strong nature of the movement, it was impulsive, and the corrections were flat, + the exhaustion of the sellerâs protection caused the pressure.
In general, in this vein, expecting a test of the BackToCreek level (Breakout Area) before the breakdown of the key sales area was a mistake.
â This is the mercilessness of recoilless movements, you expect normal development (with corrections, etc.), but this does not happen, and you simply stand out of position and miss the movement. On such a movement, you need to enter either very skillfully on junior TFs using early tests of local actions, or on a breakout of bad manipulation (the logic of continuation of the impulse, I will not focus on this, this is not what Iâm talking about now)
âłď¸ In general, according to the weekly TF, I will think like this (see screenshot), but I will reduce the probability to 55-60%.
Best regards @lucky_trades_finder
#binance #Bitcoin #BTC
â Hello everyone, you need to accept your mistakes, but sometimes itâs not pleasant to do so, especially when youâve been right at key points for a long time :)))
â Although the medium-term alternative monthly wait is not bad. (where I wrote: In the medium term I expect the buyer to resume after the BTC test (BackToCreek)), but still, to begin with, I expected a test that did not happen and the buyer went without it. There's nothing you can do about it, that's the risk.
â Although short-term intraday waiting on Friday (I donât trade or run a channel on weekends) worked well, itâs still a countertrend.
â But in general, Iâm not happy with myself, and hereâs why: Contextually, the price for older TFs (day, week) was in the area of ââpotential interest of the seller. And everyone observed the impact of this fact; the price could not break through this area for a long time.
â Indirectly, it was clear that there was pressure on the sales area during the day, and the sellerâs protection was getting worse and worse. Next, a trivial impulse breakdown of the sellerâs area occurs. For me, these are ordinary situations that I have seen hundreds of times, but this is my mistake.
â I did not take into account the strong nature of the movement, it was impulsive, and the corrections were flat, + the exhaustion of the sellerâs protection caused the pressure.
In general, in this vein, expecting a test of the BackToCreek level (Breakout Area) before the breakdown of the key sales area was a mistake.
â This is the mercilessness of recoilless movements, you expect normal development (with corrections, etc.), but this does not happen, and you simply stand out of position and miss the movement. On such a movement, you need to enter either very skillfully on junior TFs using early tests of local actions, or on a breakout of bad manipulation (the logic of continuation of the impulse, I will not focus on this, this is not what Iâm talking about now)
âłď¸ In general, according to the weekly TF, I will think like this (see screenshot), but I will reduce the probability to 55-60%.
Best regards @lucky_trades_finder
See original
#week #ОМиданио #btc
â Hello everyone, during the weekly TF I will think like this for now.
âI remind you that the main option is indicated in red/green (Either immediately or with a rollback), blue is the level of logical cancellation of waiting, and alternatives at key points are in gray.â
â ď¸ Don't forget about the risks.
Best regards @lucky_trades_finder
â Hello everyone, during the weekly TF I will think like this for now.
âI remind you that the main option is indicated in red/green (Either immediately or with a rollback), blue is the level of logical cancellation of waiting, and alternatives at key points are in gray.â
â ď¸ Don't forget about the risks.
Best regards @lucky_trades_finder
See original
In the process of participating in transactions, if you encounter problems, it is best to seek professional advice. If you have doubts, consulting a trusted financial advisor, lawyer, or relevant professional institution is a good approach. However, do not easily trust those suddenly appearing unfamiliar 'well-wishers' online; do not ask them for help, as it can easily lead to falling into the trap of secondary fraud. Scams are constantly emerging, and those unfamiliar netizens will not genuinely help you achieve wealth growth, so do not easily believe in their goodwill. #WEEK #WXT
# $BTC WEEKLY Alertđ¨đ¨đ¨ :
In my opinion last week $BTC failed to close below the critical support level but showed significant downward movement in the following week.
The price is now approaching this key support level again. If this week's candle closes below this support, we could see a substantial decline in price, potentially followed by a retest of the broken support level.
Poll: What do you think will happen next
1. Bitcoin will close below the support level and continue to drop.
2. Bitcoin will bounce back from the support level.
3. Bitcoin will remain around the current price level without significant movement.
Write your Option in Comments
#WeekendWisdom
#WeeklyMarketHighlights #week
In my opinion last week $BTC failed to close below the critical support level but showed significant downward movement in the following week.
The price is now approaching this key support level again. If this week's candle closes below this support, we could see a substantial decline in price, potentially followed by a retest of the broken support level.
Poll: What do you think will happen next
1. Bitcoin will close below the support level and continue to drop.
2. Bitcoin will bounce back from the support level.
3. Bitcoin will remain around the current price level without significant movement.
Write your Option in Comments
#WeekendWisdom
#WeeklyMarketHighlights #week
See original
How to Identify Phishing Scams: WEEX Exchange Security Guidelines
In the field of cryptocurrency investment, phishing scams have become a significant threat faced by investors. To help investors effectively identify and prevent such scams, WEEX has specifically formulated the following security guidelines:
1. Stay alert and carefully check links and attachments. Investors should remain highly vigilant when receiving any links or attachments claiming to be from legitimate trading platforms. Hover over links to check if their domain name matches that of the legitimate platform; for attachments, only download them after confirming their reliable source.
1. Stay alert and carefully check links and attachments. Investors should remain highly vigilant when receiving any links or attachments claiming to be from legitimate trading platforms. Hover over links to check if their domain name matches that of the legitimate platform; for attachments, only download them after confirming their reliable source.
See original
#sol $SOL #week
The forecast for Solana (SOL) next week shows volatility with a slight upward trend. According to technical analysis, SOL price may fluctuate around $142 - $144 by the end of August, then trend up in September, reaching $150 - $160. Indicators such as RSI show that SOL is in a long-term uptrend, although MACD shows that short-term weakness is possible
The forecast for Solana (SOL) next week shows volatility with a slight upward trend. According to technical analysis, SOL price may fluctuate around $142 - $144 by the end of August, then trend up in September, reaching $150 - $160. Indicators such as RSI show that SOL is in a long-term uptrend, although MACD shows that short-term weakness is possible
Login to explore more contents