Bollinger Bands consist of 3 lines plotted on the price chart:
Middle Band = 20-period Simple Moving Average (SMA) ā Shows the average price over the last 20 candles. Upper Band = Middle Band + (2 Ć Standard Deviation) ā Measures how far price is above the average (volatility). Lower Band = Middle Band ā (2 Ć Standard Deviation) ā Measures how far price is below the average.
Standard settings: 20-period SMA + 2 standard deviations (works on any time frame).
Core Ideas Behind the Strategy
When volatility is low ā Bands squeeze (get narrow). When volatility is high ā Bands expand (get wide). Price tends to stay inside the bands 95% of the time. Price touching or closing outside the bands is unusual ā often leads to reversal or strong continuation.
My Personal Favorite Combo (Used in the WIN signal above)
Wait for price to touch or close near the Lower Band. Confirm itās at a known support level (previous low, Fibonacci, etc.). Enter long when candle closes back inside the bands or shows reversal (pin bar, engulfing). Target = Middle Band (20 SMA) first, then Upper Band. Stop loss = just below the Lower Band or support.
This is exactly what I used for the WIN trade:
Price touched Lower Band ($0.00003153) ā treated as dynamic support. Entered slightly above at $0.00003300 after bounce. Target Upper Band area ($0.00003886).
Key Rules to Avoid Fake Signals
Never trade the touch alone in a strong trend (youāll get destroyed). Always combine with: Volume (breakouts need rising volume) RSI (avoid buying overbought Upper Band touches) Trend direction (200 SMA or ADX) Candlestick confirmation
The strongest signals happen after a Squeeze ā Expansion.
Master these 4-5 setups and Bollinger Bands become one of the most reliable indicators, especially on crypto (which loves volatility squeezes).
Ethereum is the more established, larger, and more decentralized smartācontract platform, while Solana offers higher throughput and lower fees at the cost of more aggressive design tradeoffs. Ethereum is ~4.94Ć larger by market cap and has ~5.26Ć more 24h volume than Solana. Solana is faster and cheaper per transaction, but Ethereum anchors the broader DeFi, NFT, and L2 ecosystem. Recently ETH has held up better than SOL over 1 year, suggesting relatively lower cyclical risk but also less explosive upside. $SOL
Ethereum and Solana both target smartācontract and DeFi use cases, but their tradeoffs differ. Ethereum emphasizes decentralization and acts as a base settlement layer for a large L2 ecosystem, with deeper liquidity and a larger, more mature market. Solana offers higher throughput and a smoother retail UX in one chain, which can drive bigger upside and bigger drawdowns. Which is preferable depends on whether you want a more conservative core infra bet (ETH) or a higherābeta, performanceāoriented L1 bet (SOL).
High, based on current CMC live market data and widely accepted technical and ecosystem characteristics.
Recent performance shows different risk profiles and where each is in its cycle. Performance windowEthereum (ETH)Solana (SOL)Takeaway24h change+0.44%ā0.54%Very shortāterm noise7d change+2.02%ā1.90%ETH slightly firmer this week30d changeā8.86%ā15.63%SOL has underperformed over the past month1y changeā23.58%ā43.28%SOL drawdown is deeper over the past year Narrative and risk differences: Ethereum
Anchors the L2 ecosystem, with fee revenue increasingly shared between mainnet and rollups.Seen as āsafer coreā infra, with relatively slower but steadier scaling via rollups and upgrades.Regulatory and macro narrative often treat ETH as the primary smartācontract asset after BTC.
Solana
Known for high throughput and strong retail narratives such as memecoins and NFT cycles.Historically had outages and performance incidents, which are improving but remain a perceived risk.Offers faster UX and cheaper transactions, which can supercharge upside in periods of heavy onāchain activity, but also concentrates technical and ecosystem risk on one chain.
SOL tends to behave as a higher beta play on smartācontract adoption and speculation, while ETH behaves more like a core infrastructure asset with somewhat lower downside and lower upside per unit of capital in extreme moves. Comparison of ETH and SOL24h ETH $3052.61 8.69%
SOL $133.24 15.45% 17 Nov1 Dec-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%-8.69%-15.45%
By current numbers, Ethereum is still the larger and more liquid asset.
MetricEthereum (ETH)Solana (SOL)CommentCMC rank27Both are topā10 large capsMarket cap$368.68 B$74.64 BETH is ~4.94Ć SOL by value24h volume$10.51 B$2.00 BETH has ~5.26Ć SOL trading volume7d volume$116.93 B$14.12 BDeeper, more global liquidity for ETH30d volume$688.74 B$114.41 BETH more integrated across CEXs and DeFiATH drawdown (below ATH)~38.34%~54.77%SOL is further below its peak Using the market caps, Ethereum is about 4.94Ć larger than Solana.
ETH usually has tighter spreads, larger order books, and more derivatives markets.SOL is still very liquid, but large capital flows may move its price more in percentage terms.Institutional adoption and onāchain collateral usage are broader for ETH today.
If you care about market depth, derivatives access, and āblueāchipā status, ETH has the edge, while SOL offers a smaller, more volatile platform bet.
Ethereum (ETH) is the native asset of theĀ Ethereum (ETH)Ā network, the dominant generalāpurpose smartācontract platform and settlement layer for a large ecosystem of L2s such as Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, and many others. Solana (SOL) is the native token ofĀ Solana (SOL), a highāthroughput layerā1 that keeps execution and data on one chain and focuses on very fast block times and low fees using a proofāofāhistory plus proofāofāstake design.
Ethereum favors decentralization, security, and neutrality, pushing most scaling to L2 rollups.Solana favors performance and UX on a single chain, accepting higher hardware demands and a smaller validator set.ETH is used heavily as collateral and gas across many chains; SOL is mainly used inside the Solana ecosystem for gas, staking, and DeFi.
ETH is increasingly a ābase money plus settlementā asset for a multiāchain world, while SOL is a highāperformance monolithic chain bet. $ETH $SOL $BTC #Ethereum #solana #BTCčµ°åæåę
USTC is a tiny, highly speculative exāstablecoin, while SOL is a major smartācontract platform with much larger scale and usage. USTC is a deāpegged former algorithmic stablecoin on Terra Classic; SOL is the native token of the Solana L1 smartācontract network. SOL is roughly 1,100Ć larger by market cap (about $74.64 B vs $66.81 M) and has deeper liquidity. USTC shows extreme pumpāstyle volatility, while SOL behaves more like a largeācap āplatformā asset tied to ecosystem growth and market cycles.
USTC and SOL are not substitutes. USTC is a tiny, deāpegged legacy stablecoin token with extreme speculative risk, whereas SOL is a topātier smartācontract platform asset with vastly larger market cap, liquidity, and ecosystem importance. Any comparison or allocation decision between them really comes down to whether you want very highārisk punts or exposure to a major L1ās longāterm growth.
USTC has very high shortāterm volatility, with percent change24h at +61.95%, percent change7d at +100.71%, and percent change 30d at +76.81%, driven by speculative spikes rather than fundamentals. SOL has more moderate, largeācap style swings, with percent change24h at about ā0.5394%, percentchange7d at ā1.9%, and percentchange30d at ā15.63%, reflecting broader market rotation rather than oneāoff pumps. From an allātimeāhigh perspective, USTC remains almost entirely wiped out (athdrawdownpct around 98.86%), while SOL is roughly 54.77% below its ATH, which is more typical for a cyclical largeācap that has already seen big bull and bear phases.
USTC is a postācollapse token whose value is now purely marketādriven and subject to narrative spikes and community experiments on Terra Classic. SOLās value is linked to ongoing network usage, developer activity and broader sentiment toward highāthroughput L1s.
USTC moves like a lottery ticket with extreme upside and downside in short bursts, while SOL trades more like a core ecosystem asset whose path depends on adoption, fees, and macro crypto cycles.
On current data, SOL is orders of magnitude larger and more liquid than USTC . Using these figures, SOLās market cap is about 1,117Ć larger than USTCās.
Much deeper order books and tighter spreads for SOL across major CEXs and DEXs. Greater institutional and retail participation in SOL compared with USTCās mainly retailādriven speculative flows.
If you care about depth and āblueāchipā style exposure, SOL sits in a completely different tier from USTC, which trades more like a microācap punt.
Solana (SOL) is the native asset of theĀ Solana (SOL)Ā blockchain, a highāthroughput layerā1 designed for DeFi, NFTs and general dApps, using a hybrid proofāofāhistory plus proofāofāstake consensus to scale throughput and keep fees low.
TerraClassicUSD (USTC) is the legacyĀ TerraClassicUSD (USTC)Ā token, originally an algorithmic stablecoin designed to stay at $1 via mintāburn with LUNA/LUNC, but after the May 2022 Terra collapse its peg mechanism was disabled and it now trades freely as a speculative Terra Classic ecosystem asset, not as a stablecoin.
You are effectively comparing a small speculative token tied to a failed stablecoin system with a large baseālayer smartācontract coin that underpins an active ecosystem.