故Yuan
Open Trade
BNB Holder
High-Frequency Trader
1.1 Months
八方来财
7 Following
18 Followers
25 Liked
1 Shared
All
Quotes
Translate
庆祝大哥回归
大智-X
--
🧧🧧Celebrating Big Cousin @cz_binance being pardoned by Trump,
🧧🧧 distributing 8888 red envelopes in the square, hoping to share in Cousin's fortune!
#加密市场回调 #美国政府停摆 #美联储支付创新大会
🧧🧧 distributing 8888 red envelopes in the square, hoping to share in Cousin's fortune!
#加密市场回调 #美国政府停摆 #美联储支付创新大会
See original
Well done
Alpha has taken action: Last night, Binance Alpha cleared accounts with no contributions, reshaping ecological fairness
Binance Alpha recently launched a new round of actions against "non-contributing accounts," with the core objective targeting various types of "bots" and "script studios." The essence of this containment strategy is to clean up those accounts that are only for short-term arbitrage and have no ecological participation, including individual manual bots and bulk script studios. These accounts often only appear during airdrops and trading competitions, creating false active data through automated scripts for volume, placing orders, and transferring assets, without providing any real liquidity or trading depth to the Alpha ecosystem, even if they are manually operated, the system determines they contribute nothing and are indistinguishable from bots.
Platform data shows that these "non-contributing accounts" can occupy three to five percent of active participants during peak times, severely squeezing ordinary users' fair opportunities and undermining the original intention of project incentives. Binance Alpha's risk control system accurately identifies and removes abnormal participants through multi-dimensional recognition, including on-chain interaction frequency, account fund behavior, API operation modes, etc.
In contrast, users who genuinely contribute to the ecosystem—such as those who trade contracts long-term, engage in real spot transactions, stake on-chain, and hold positions—are recognized by the system as "real value users" and are hardly subject to risk control restrictions. The Alpha team will distinguish between "speculative behavior" and "constructive behavior" through more refined algorithms in the future, allowing traders who genuinely participate in ecological development to receive higher weights and more incentives.
Last night, a portion of participants in the $ASP trading competition were subject to risk control. Don't think you are innocent; big data comprehensively judges you as a bot with no substantial contribution, and being banned is justified. Perhaps some may have been mistakenly banned, so just appeal if that's the case.
The following categories are easily subject to risk control:
Only participating in Alpha and trading competitions as well as other white-box behaviors
Newly registered accounts with no contribution
Typical accounts with no real trading behavior
Accounts controlled in bulk by scripts and studios
Accounts only participating in "short-term arbitrage" activities
Conversely, accounts that hold positions long-term, frequently trade contracts, stake on-chain, and interact with multiple token ecosystems are hardly misjudged.
The core logic of system identification is: Contribution value ≠ Active frequency, but rather the real trading depth and fund retention behavior.
#ALPHA
Binance Alpha recently launched a new round of actions against "non-contributing accounts," with the core objective targeting various types of "bots" and "script studios." The essence of this containment strategy is to clean up those accounts that are only for short-term arbitrage and have no ecological participation, including individual manual bots and bulk script studios. These accounts often only appear during airdrops and trading competitions, creating false active data through automated scripts for volume, placing orders, and transferring assets, without providing any real liquidity or trading depth to the Alpha ecosystem, even if they are manually operated, the system determines they contribute nothing and are indistinguishable from bots.
Platform data shows that these "non-contributing accounts" can occupy three to five percent of active participants during peak times, severely squeezing ordinary users' fair opportunities and undermining the original intention of project incentives. Binance Alpha's risk control system accurately identifies and removes abnormal participants through multi-dimensional recognition, including on-chain interaction frequency, account fund behavior, API operation modes, etc.
In contrast, users who genuinely contribute to the ecosystem—such as those who trade contracts long-term, engage in real spot transactions, stake on-chain, and hold positions—are recognized by the system as "real value users" and are hardly subject to risk control restrictions. The Alpha team will distinguish between "speculative behavior" and "constructive behavior" through more refined algorithms in the future, allowing traders who genuinely participate in ecological development to receive higher weights and more incentives.
Last night, a portion of participants in the $ASP trading competition were subject to risk control. Don't think you are innocent; big data comprehensively judges you as a bot with no substantial contribution, and being banned is justified. Perhaps some may have been mistakenly banned, so just appeal if that's the case.
The following categories are easily subject to risk control:
Only participating in Alpha and trading competitions as well as other white-box behaviors
Newly registered accounts with no contribution
Typical accounts with no real trading behavior
Accounts controlled in bulk by scripts and studios
Accounts only participating in "short-term arbitrage" activities
Conversely, accounts that hold positions long-term, frequently trade contracts, stake on-chain, and interact with multiple token ecosystems are hardly misjudged.
The core logic of system identification is: Contribution value ≠ Active frequency, but rather the real trading depth and fund retention behavior.
#ALPHA
See original
AMA
CZ
--
Heard there is an AMA.
See original
Sister, take a look at this, I think it's quite reliable #YiHe
I have some experience in design and product interaction. Based on my personal experience participating in the Alpha airdrop, I offer the following suggestions for reference:
1. The graphical captcha is easily broken; it is recommended to add a variation mechanism.
Currently, the captcha graphics are too fixed (commonly 2-3 sets of combinations), and have not been updated for a long time, making them easily recognizable by automated technology.
Suggestion: Replace with dynamic captcha or regularly change the captcha mechanism or material library, and increase behavioral trajectory recognition to assist verification (such as sliding trajectory, mouse movement).
2. The "pre-verification mechanism" actually harms real users.
The "pre-verification" 10-15 minutes before the airdrop has little impact on scripts but disrupts the rhythm of real users. Suggestions:
Shorten the pre-verification window to 1-2 minutes.
Or cancel the pre-verification, change to immediate verification upon starting the grab.
Increase the intensity of the first round of verification to replace pre-verification.
3. Strengthen user behavior profiling to distinguish between real and "farmed" users.
It is recommended to score and layer user historical behavior, for example:
Low activity/Low contribution users: No holdings, frequently brushing scores, dumping immediately after airdrop, no community behavior.
High-quality users: Have holdings, participation, and interaction.
Set those with excessively low scores as:
Limited to partial quota collection (e.g., 50%).
Cumulative penalty mechanism (multiple anomalies lead to direct invalidation).
4. Identify batch operations from device/IP/geographical behavior levels.
Most studios farm accounts using the same batch of devices for management convenience, their device information (such as browser fingerprints), IP segments, geographical locations, etc., are highly concentrated. Suggestions:
Identify same-origin groups through device fingerprints.
If the location is the same + the collection path is consistent + short-term explosive operations, direct risk control freezing or throttling can be implemented.
If relevant mechanisms have been deployed, clarifications are welcome, as well as further optimizations from a user experience perspective. Thank you for the team's efforts. After the liquidation, I hope to slowly recover through airdrops. I hope users like me can grab it 🙏@Yi He @币安中文社区 @CZ
I also hope the brothers can help spread the word; if the airdrop cannot be grabbed, optimization is very much needed.
1. The graphical captcha is easily broken; it is recommended to add a variation mechanism.
Currently, the captcha graphics are too fixed (commonly 2-3 sets of combinations), and have not been updated for a long time, making them easily recognizable by automated technology.
Suggestion: Replace with dynamic captcha or regularly change the captcha mechanism or material library, and increase behavioral trajectory recognition to assist verification (such as sliding trajectory, mouse movement).
2. The "pre-verification mechanism" actually harms real users.
The "pre-verification" 10-15 minutes before the airdrop has little impact on scripts but disrupts the rhythm of real users. Suggestions:
Shorten the pre-verification window to 1-2 minutes.
Or cancel the pre-verification, change to immediate verification upon starting the grab.
Increase the intensity of the first round of verification to replace pre-verification.
3. Strengthen user behavior profiling to distinguish between real and "farmed" users.
It is recommended to score and layer user historical behavior, for example:
Low activity/Low contribution users: No holdings, frequently brushing scores, dumping immediately after airdrop, no community behavior.
High-quality users: Have holdings, participation, and interaction.
Set those with excessively low scores as:
Limited to partial quota collection (e.g., 50%).
Cumulative penalty mechanism (multiple anomalies lead to direct invalidation).
4. Identify batch operations from device/IP/geographical behavior levels.
Most studios farm accounts using the same batch of devices for management convenience, their device information (such as browser fingerprints), IP segments, geographical locations, etc., are highly concentrated. Suggestions:
Identify same-origin groups through device fingerprints.
If the location is the same + the collection path is consistent + short-term explosive operations, direct risk control freezing or throttling can be implemented.
If relevant mechanisms have been deployed, clarifications are welcome, as well as further optimizations from a user experience perspective. Thank you for the team's efforts. After the liquidation, I hope to slowly recover through airdrops. I hope users like me can grab it 🙏@Yi He @币安中文社区 @CZ
I also hope the brothers can help spread the word; if the airdrop cannot be grabbed, optimization is very much needed.
See original
256 points, fully counted, brushing 16+2 for a full cycle only yields 255 points, where does this leave us retail investors? The studio itself can create a meme and brush three to four hundred points, while the airdrop is all taken by them.
See original
Must be strictly cracked down, retail investors really have no way out.
#alpha Recently, it has been too difficult to grab airdrops. It's time to take action. Here are two suggestions: first, comprehensively increase facial recognition and digital Q&A to raise verification difficulty; second, add a first phase to generally lower earnings. With no benefits, studios will naturally not participate. Third, recheck airdrop accounts that receive 8-15 in half a month, as this is abnormal. A normal user receiving 4-5 in half a month is already quite good. Some of these should be studio accounts.
See original
Agree
Yi He
--
Some friends are really not suitable for trading. Everyone should pay attention to what I have said many times in my articles about 'professional players' and 'institutional players'.
If you see others shouting to follow the trend and buy, or if you believe that MEME means that a certain word mentioned on Twitter is a signal for buying, or if you completely do not do research and buy blindly, expecting only increases and no decreases, please reflect on yourselves regarding the above.
I suggest you try stablecoin wealth management, participate in the square to produce content and earn points for airdrops, and try to work hard in the square live broadcasts to receive big rockets. 🙏
If you see others shouting to follow the trend and buy, or if you believe that MEME means that a certain word mentioned on Twitter is a signal for buying, or if you completely do not do research and buy blindly, expecting only increases and no decreases, please reflect on yourselves regarding the above.
I suggest you try stablecoin wealth management, participate in the square to produce content and earn points for airdrops, and try to work hard in the square live broadcasts to receive big rockets. 🙏
See original
No one is taking the high score, so let's wait for the second round to see.
Too many monks, not enough porridge.
Too many monks, not enough porridge.
Login to explore more contents