The Unlucky Cryptos of 2025: Coins That Are Drowning in Losses
The crypto wave that sparked massive gains in 2021–2024 has been replaced in 2025 by a harsh tide: bears are in control, risk-appetite is fading, and many once-promising coins are bleeding value. If you bought or are holding crypto this year, here are some of the big names that are now deeply in loss — and why they’re struggling.
🔻 The Big Casualties: Major Coins That Fell Hard Ethereum (ETH) — Once considered the stable altcoin choice, ETH has suffered heavy losses: in some reports, a drop of ~45% from its earlier highs. CoinGecko Assets The Crypto Times Solana ($SOL ) — A top-tier blockchain that enjoyed popularity, Solana is also down — in 2025 many sources show a 30–35% decline. WisdomTree World Coin Index Cardano ($ADA ) — Once hyped for its promise, Cardano hasn’t avoided the slump. It’s reportedly lost around 20–23% in value over the year. Arabian Business Even relatively large-cap altcoins — once considered “safer bets” compared to tiny speculative tokens — have not escaped. The broader picture: among the top cryptos, ETH and SOL took some of the hardest hits. Cryptonews WisdomTree ⚠️ The Danger Zone: High-Risk Coins and Meme / Speculative Tokens Beyond the “established” coins, many smaller or hype-driven tokens (often called “meme coins” or speculative alts) are in deep red. Recent data shows that a shocking ~70% of 2025’s once-promising cryptocurrencies recorded double-digit losses year-to-date. CryptoNexa - Crypto News Some of the worst-hit coins include: Aptos — reportedly down around 63% YTD, after a large token unlock triggered massive selling pressure. CryptoNexa - Crypto News Patriot — one of the hardest crashes in 2025, losing up to 96% of its value, due to weak adoption and poor market sentiment. CryptoNexa - Crypto News Others — including smaller-cap and niche tokens — have fallen 40–50% or more. Arabian Business Moreover, the broader speculative ecosystem — memecoins, hype tokens, many DeFi- or novelty-oriented coins — has taken a brutal blow. According to one report, the memecoin market cap fell dramatically, wiping out billions in value as investor enthusiasm evaporated and the crypto market turned risk-averse. Cointelegraph 🧭 Why So Many Coins Are Down: Unpacking the Crash What’s driving this wave of losses across diverse coins — from top-tier altcoins to speculative tokens? Several interlinked factors: Macro and market environment: Global financial uncertainty, shifting investor risk appetite, and broader downward pressure on risk assets. In 2025, major cryptocurrencies have come under the same stress as stock markets and other speculative assets. WisdomTree Cryptonews Liquidity drying up & weak inflows: Many smaller tokens — especially speculative ones — rely on continuous new investment to maintain value. When new money dries up, prices collapse. CryptoNexa - Crypto News Token unlocks and profit-taking: Projects that previously kept supply locked or controlled distribution sometimes release large volumes of tokens, triggering panic selling (as in the case of Aptos). CryptoNexa - Crypto News Speculation & hype correction: Many “high-potential” coins in early 2025 were hyped based on promises or social buzz rather than solid fundamentals. As reality sets in, hype fades — and so does price. Best Wallet
🎯 What This Means for Investors — And What You Should Watch Out For Diversify with caution: Holding only large-cap coins doesn’t guarantee safety — even coins like ETH and SOL are showing deep losses. Avoid high-risk speculative coins unless you’re ready for big swings: Tokens like Patriot or Aptos may have upside, but their history now shows how volatile and risky the ride can be. Watch tokenomics and supply cycles: Releases/unlocks can trigger sudden drops — always track supply schedules if you invest. Focus on fundamentals over hype: Coins with real use-cases, strong ecosystems, liquidity and community tend to be more resilient than “meme coins” or hype-driven tokens. 🔍 In Short 2025 has turned out to be a painfully corrective year for many in the crypto world. From big-name altcoins to speculative tokens, losses have covered the board. If you’re investing now or planning to, it’s essential to be especially careful: this isn’t 2021–2022 anymore. The tides have changed — and only those who adapt with caution and strategy might avoid getting washed out. @soL #Sol $SOL
Based on the numbers you shared, $BARD /USDT is sitting in a short term uptrend, but the move looks a bit stretched. Price is hovering near 0.9091, close to its 24h high of 0.9098, while the 7-EMA has already pulled up to 0.8913. That gap is not huge, but it is wide enough to hint that buyers may be running slightly ahead of the trend. The 25- and 99-EMAs at 0.8533 and 0.8013 show a clean bullish slope, which tells you the broader structure is still improving even if the latest leg might cool off.
The part that makes this chart a little tricky is the contrast between momentum and sustainability. Volume at 19,145.5 suggests participation, yet the sharp jump from the 24h low at 0.7402 to the high puts the move in a spot where fast money often takes profit. When a coin lifts this quickly above its medium EMAs, it tends to invite both late buyers and early sellers. That mix can produce choppy candles rather than a steady continuation.
If $BARD holds above the 0.8850 region, the short trend likely stays intact. If it slips below the 7-EMA, you might see a slide back toward the mid 0.85s where the 25-EMA sits. In plain terms, the chart looks bullish but fragile. A push beyond 0.9170 would show real strength. A rejection there would tell you this rally was more enthusiasm than conviction. This is analysis, not financial advice.
$AAVE is pushing into a spot where the chart looks confident but a bit too heated for comfort. Price is sitting around 194 with a sharp 15 percent daily jump, which usually means momentum traders are driving the move rather than steady accumulation. The short term EMAs are stacked in a healthy way. EMA7 is above EMA25 and both sit well above EMA99. That usually signals bullish pressure, but when everything starts climbing this quickly the market often overreacts. The fact that price barely slipped below 168 in the last 24 hours shows dip buyers are aggressive, maybe a little desperate.
Volume is the odd part. A 168k $AAVE turnover paired with more than 31 million USDT suggests the move is loud but not as deep as it looks. The candles are stretching upward while the volume rhythm feels uneven, which often leads to a snapback. MA5 and MA10 volume levels are unusually high relative to the raw trading volume shown, which hints that volatility is being absorbed by fewer participants than usual. That kind of imbalance can push price higher in the short term yet leave it exposed if hype cools or Bitcoin sneezes.
If $AAVE holds above 190 for another session, it could grind into the 200 zone without much resistance. Still, this rally looks like it is running hotter than the fundamentals of the move justify. A soft rejection near 199 or 200 would not be surprising at all. Anyone chasing this breakout should keep an eye on EMA25 around 192. If price slices back through it, the mood could flip quickly.
Based on the numbers you provided, $PENGU looks like it’s sitting in a slightly tense spot. Price is hovering near 0.01218, which is basically pinned between short term EMAs that are all clustered in the same region. When you see EMA(7), EMA(25) and EMA(99) flattening like this, it often means the market hasn’t made up its mind. The recent dip toward 0.00964 and the quick bounce back suggests buyers stepped in, but it doesn’t yet prove they can hold control for long. Volume is high enough to show interest, but not decisive enough to push a clean trend.
The thing that should raise an eyebrow is how tightly price is hugging those moving averages. When MA(5) and MA(10) balloon to such large volume contexts without a clearer breakout, it can signal the market is burning energy without real direction. This kind of setup sometimes precedes a sharp move because the chart can’t stay compressed forever, but it doesn’t guarantee the move will be up. If buyers want to take charge, they need to push the price above that 0.0126 region with conviction. If they fail, it could slip back toward the lower EMA band and test support again.
Overall, the chart feels like a coin that’s trying to look strong but hasn’t shaken off the recent volatility. Traders are watching the same levels you are, so the next candle cluster around 0.0122 to 0.0126 will likely decide whether this is a buildup or just noise. Keep an eye on volume spikes; in a setup this tight, they matter more than usual.
$SUI is sitting in a spot that looks stronger than it probably feels. Price is hovering around 1.76 with a recent push to 1.78, and the short term bias is clearly tilted upward. The 7-period EMA is above the 25-period, and both are rising. Even the 99-period EMA is climbing, which tells you this move isn’t just noise. Still, the 24-hour range shows buyers losing grip every time price gets near the upper band. It’s not weakness, but it’s not clean momentum either.
Volume is the more interesting part. SUI traded over 100 million tokens in 24 hours, but the candle volume you shared is thinning out. High volume pushed it up, low volume is keeping it afloat. That usually means the next surge decides the direction. If buyers show up again, 1.79 to 1.80 becomes the test. If they don’t, the price will probably slip back toward 1.72, and a break under that would open a path toward the 1.68 area. That’s where the market will decide whether this trend is real or just another overstretched bounce.
Overall it’s bullish on paper, but the way volume is fading makes the setup a little too convenient. Anyone chasing here should be aware that $SUI has been rewarding early buyers, not late ones. If you’re already in, you’re fine. If you’re thinking of entering, you’ll want a cleaner confirmation than a couple of EMAs behaving nicely.
$ADA is sitting in a spot that looks calm on the surface but carries real tension underneath. Price is hovering around 0.4385 with the short-term EMAs (7 and 25) slightly above the longer 99-period average. That tells you buyers have momentum, but it is still coming off a base that was weak not long ago. The recent bounce from the 0.3850 area was sharp enough to wake up sidelined traders, yet the move has not proven itself with a clean break above the 0.44 region. Every time ADA gets close to that level, sellers show up. It feels like the market believes in a recovery but does not fully trust it.
Volume adds another layer to this mess. The spike that pushed $ADA up was healthy, but follow-through volume has not been impressive. That usually means people are trading the move, not committing to it. If ADA cannot hold above the 7-period EMA for more than a couple of sessions, this entire upswing risks turning into another teasing rally that fades back into the mid 0.41 range. On the other hand, if it closes cleanly above 0.4390 with rising volume, shorts could get squeezed fast because this area has been a wall for weeks.
In short, ADA looks like it wants to climb but still behaves like a coin with something to prove. Bulls have a small edge right now, but it is fragile. A confident push above resistance would change the tone quickly, while a dip back toward 0.42 would remind everyone how easily sentiment flips on this chart.
Based strictly on the data you provided, $COMP looks like it’s trying to push higher but keeps running into hesitation. Price is hovering around 35.4, which is stuck between the recent high at 37.29 and the low at 32.23. The short and mid EMAs (7 and 25) are basically glued together at 35.64 and 35.67, which signals a tug-of-war rather than clear momentum. The longer EMA at 34.63 sitting underneath shows the broader trend is still slightly upward, but not with the kind of strength traders like to brag about. Volume is decent but not explosive, which fits the picture of a market that wants direction but hasn’t chosen one.
Here’s the part that may annoy both bulls and bears. Bulls can point to the price trading above the 99-period EMA, plus that recent 24-hour gain. But the repeated rejection near 37 suggests buyers aren’t confident enough to break out. Bears have their own headache because every dip toward the 34.6 level is getting absorbed. If either side wants to take control, something has to give around 35 to 36. Until that level gets broken cleanly, calling a trend here is more guesswork than analysis.
If you’re trading this, keep an eye on how price behaves around 37 and 34.5. A close above 37 with real volume would open the door to a stronger move. A breakdown under 34.5 would flip the tone completely. Right now the market is acting like it wants a catalyst, not a sermon about long term conviction.
$OG is sitting in an interesting spot right now. Price is hovering around 12.36 with short term EMAs stacked in a gentle uptrend. EMA 7 is slightly above EMA 25 and EMA 99, which usually signals steady bullish pressure, not a breakout. The 24 hour range between 11.66 and 12.50 shows buyers are active but not aggressive. Volume around 295k OG and 3.56M USDT suggests the move is real enough, but not the kind that sweeps the chart clean.
Still, the market feels a bit too comfortable. OG has a habit of pulling back right when traders start warming up. With MA 5 and MA 10 volume readings sitting unusually high, this rally could be running hotter than it looks. If price fails to push cleanly above 12.50, expect a dip toward the 12.00 and 11.80 regions where liquidity sits. Bulls can defend those levels, but if they slip, momentum traders will bail fast.
For now the trend leans upward but not with conviction. A close above yesterday’s high would flip sentiment quickly. Anything less leaves $OG vulnerable to sharp whipsaws that shake out late buyers. This is one of those setups where the chart is smiling at you while keeping a knife behind its back.
The chart for $HEI /USDT shows a market that is trying to look confident, but the momentum is thinner than it seems at first glance. Price is sitting around 0.2112, just above the short-term averages. EMA7 at 0.2094 is leading EMA25 and EMA99, which signals short bursts of buying pressure, but the gap between the averages is small. This usually means traders are pushing the price around without settling on a real direction. The recent move from the 0.1957 low toward the 0.2320 high looks more like an opportunistic bounce than a stable trend.
Volume adds to that suspicion. A 16.88M $HEI turnover sounds active, but the USDT side shows only 3.60M, which hints that liquidity is concentrated among a small group of traders. When the volume mix looks uneven like this, strong moves can flip quickly because not enough new money is entering to support the price. The MA values are also odd. MA5 at 94,328.3 and MA10 at 75,584.1 suggest unusual spikes in activity rather than steady participation, which can distort the chart and trick less experienced traders into thinking the trend is stronger than it is.
Overall, HEI is in a spot where any direction is possible, but the current setup leans more toward short-term speculation than long-term conviction. The EMAs show mild strength, yet the structure underneath is shaky. If the price fails to hold above the 0.209–0.206 zone, the market could easily slide back toward 0.200 and below. If it manages to push past 0.2129 with real volume, the narrative changes. Until then, it’s better treated as a fragile upmove rather than a reliable trend.
The chart action on $RESOLV /USDT looks like a market that wants to climb but keeps tripping over its own feet. Price is holding above the short EMAs, with EMA7 at 0.0782 and spot price around 0.0790, which shows buyers are still swinging. Still, the failed push toward 0.0858 exposes how weak conviction really is. The higher volume spikes are coming on pullbacks, not breakouts, which usually means traders are selling into strength instead of chasing it.
What makes this setup tricky is the narrowing gap between EMA25 and EMA99. When the mid and long trend lines start flattening together, it often signals indecision, not a healthy trend. The support around 0.0694 has been tested enough times to make anyone wonder how long it holds. If buyers let price slip back toward that zone again, it will look less like a dip and more like a sign that the market is tired of pretending it wants higher levels.
Overall, the structure is technically bullish on the surface, but it has that uncomfortable feeling of a rally that is running on fumes. If $RESOLV cannot break and hold above the 0.0830 to 0.0860 area soon, traders may start calling the bluff.
$IOST is trying to push higher, but the chart looks like a tug of war between impatient buyers and sellers who still think the rally is undeserved. Price is sitting around 0.002308 with a recent spike to 0.002350. The short EMAs are crawling above the longer ones, which shows buyers are trying to take control. Still, the move is narrow and not exactly convincing. When a coin hugs its EMAs this tightly, it usually means the market does not fully trust the breakout.
Volume tells a similar story. You have a huge 24h token volume but a much smaller USDT turnover, which often hints at quick rotations rather than confident accumulation. The 15m to 1D structure shows higher lows forming, but each push gets sold into. The 0.002021 level looks like the line the market refuses to break. If it snaps, the whole setup loses its charm fast. If it holds, the coin may grind its way up just to frustrate everyone who expects a clean trend.
Overall, $IOST looks like it wants to move higher but the market is not giving it an easy runway. Anyone calling this a strong bullish trend is stretching it. At best, it is a fragile upward drift that needs a clean close above the recent high to turn into something real. If it stalls again, expect the mood to flip quickly.
Based on the data you shared, $TNSR is showing a short burst of strength, but it is not a clean trend. The short-term EMAs sit tightly together and the price is only slightly above the 7 and 25 periods, which hints that buyers have momentum but not full control. The jump to 0.1528 followed by a pullback to 0.1408 tells you the move is being chased rather than built on steady demand. Volume is large enough to keep the move alive, yet the mix of high turnover and a 27 percent daily gain often signals traders flipping positions rather than long holders stepping in.
The tension shows up in the volume averages too. The latest bar’s 3 million unit volume is below the 5-period average but close to the 10-period one, which usually appears near the middle of a momentum cooldown. If buyers were serious about pushing through the 0.1500 region, you would expect volume spikes that beat both averages. The fact that the 99-period EMA still sits at 0.1323 means the broader trend is intact, but it also warns that the price is not far from giving back this rally if it slips under 0.1370.
If you want the blunt read, this setup looks like a market that wants to go higher but is being traded like a short term toy. A clean hold above 0.1460 would show that buyers are more than just late chasers. A drop under the mid range would tell you this pump was soft. This is one of those situations where the chart is promising on the surface but the behavior behind it is still questionable.
They say ALPHA does not provide profit, perhaps they are right. Waiting too long in Alpha and entering any token without research only leads to losses. I have earned 5X from 27 tokens in ALPHA despite losses for a year, and I am currently only $10 in profit in ARTX, and I have 400 ARTX coins and $30 profit in one account, so you should also try, definitely do your research, and it can still give you 2X in just a few days. KINDLY DYOR $ARTX #BinanceAlphaAlert #AltcoinMarketRecovery