kaymyg
Open Trade
Frequent Trader
4.9 Years
Web2 & Web3
Web3 & Web2
15 Following
1.5K+ Followers
1.7K+ Liked
504 Shared
All
Quotes
Videos
PINNED
18 Cryptocurrency Commandments.
1. Never buy a coin/token during its all-time high.
Wait for a pullback or correction before entering.
2. Do your own research (#DYOR ).
Never invest based on hype or others' advice without understanding the project, team and use case.
3. Invest only what you can afford to lose.
Crypto is volatile—don't put your rent or savings at risk.
4. Keep your private keys private.
Not your keys, not your coins. Use secure wallets.
5. Diversify your portfolio.
Don't put all your money into one coin or project; spread the risk across multiple assets.
6. Take profits.
Don’t wait for “the moon.” Set realistic profit targets and stick to them.
7. Beware of #FOMO (Fear of Missing Out).
Jumping into a project without a plan usually leads to losses.
8. Avoid leverage unless you’re experienced.
Margin trading can amplify gains, but it can also wipe out your account.
9. Stay updated but avoid overtrading.
Watch market trends, but don’t constantly buy and sell out of impatience.
10. Beware of scams.
If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Avoid shady links, unsolicited messages, and dubious platforms.
11. Understand market cycles.
Crypto runs on boom-and-bust cycles; learn to identify bull and bear markets.
12. Control your emotions.
Fear and greed are your enemies—make decisions based on analysis, not feelings.
13. Use stop-loss orders.
Protect your investments by setting automatic sell points to limit losses.
14. Secure your accounts.
Use two-factor authentication (2FA) and strong passwords for your exchange and wallet accounts.
15. Pay attention to regulations.
Stay informed about your country’s laws on crypto to avoid legal issues.
16. Don’t chase pumps.
If a coin’s price has skyrocketed, it’s usually too late to profit safely.
17. Stay patient.
Wealth in crypto often comes from holding (HODLing) good projects, not day trading.
18. Learn from mistakes.
Every loss is a lesson—review and refine your strategies.
$XRP
$KSM
1. Never buy a coin/token during its all-time high.
Wait for a pullback or correction before entering.
2. Do your own research (#DYOR ).
Never invest based on hype or others' advice without understanding the project, team and use case.
3. Invest only what you can afford to lose.
Crypto is volatile—don't put your rent or savings at risk.
4. Keep your private keys private.
Not your keys, not your coins. Use secure wallets.
5. Diversify your portfolio.
Don't put all your money into one coin or project; spread the risk across multiple assets.
6. Take profits.
Don’t wait for “the moon.” Set realistic profit targets and stick to them.
7. Beware of #FOMO (Fear of Missing Out).
Jumping into a project without a plan usually leads to losses.
8. Avoid leverage unless you’re experienced.
Margin trading can amplify gains, but it can also wipe out your account.
9. Stay updated but avoid overtrading.
Watch market trends, but don’t constantly buy and sell out of impatience.
10. Beware of scams.
If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Avoid shady links, unsolicited messages, and dubious platforms.
11. Understand market cycles.
Crypto runs on boom-and-bust cycles; learn to identify bull and bear markets.
12. Control your emotions.
Fear and greed are your enemies—make decisions based on analysis, not feelings.
13. Use stop-loss orders.
Protect your investments by setting automatic sell points to limit losses.
14. Secure your accounts.
Use two-factor authentication (2FA) and strong passwords for your exchange and wallet accounts.
15. Pay attention to regulations.
Stay informed about your country’s laws on crypto to avoid legal issues.
16. Don’t chase pumps.
If a coin’s price has skyrocketed, it’s usually too late to profit safely.
17. Stay patient.
Wealth in crypto often comes from holding (HODLing) good projects, not day trading.
18. Learn from mistakes.
Every loss is a lesson—review and refine your strategies.
$XRP
$KSM
🔥 Proposal: Hybrid Stake-to-Burn & Earn BTCB Model 🔥
Concept: Transform quarterly $BNB burns into a community-engaged, value-generating event.
How it works:
1️⃣ Users stake $BNB (max $1,000/wallet) into a #BNBBurnPool .
2️⃣ @BNB Chain contributes 1% of the intended burn into the pool, this BNB is burned directly, keeping deflation intact.
3️⃣ All staked #BNB is used to generate organic yield via Binance’s internal staking mechanisms.
4️⃣ 100% of the yield is converted to #BTCB and airdropped proportionally to stakers.
5️⃣ Users get back their full BNB principal at the end of the quarter.
Key Benefits:
Users earn BTCB rewards while keeping their BNB safe.
@BNB Chain preserves quarterly burn integrity without requiring users to sacrifice capital.
Strengthens #BNBChain engagement and creates a transparent, gamified yield event.
Custody is managed within #Binance , minimizing DeFi risk, while voting and proofs remain on-chain.
Transparency & Safety:
On-chain voting for reward token selection.
Quarterly snapshots: BNB staked, yield generated, BTCB airdropped, burn proof.
Optional Merkle proof for verifying airdrop accuracy.
💡 The Result:
BNB burns continue as scheduled
Stakers earn BTCB yield
Participants retain principal
Binance fosters engagement and community-driven deflation
This is not just a burn, it’s a community-powered, yield-driven BNB celebration.
@Yi He
Concept: Transform quarterly $BNB burns into a community-engaged, value-generating event.
How it works:
1️⃣ Users stake $BNB (max $1,000/wallet) into a #BNBBurnPool .
2️⃣ @BNB Chain contributes 1% of the intended burn into the pool, this BNB is burned directly, keeping deflation intact.
3️⃣ All staked #BNB is used to generate organic yield via Binance’s internal staking mechanisms.
4️⃣ 100% of the yield is converted to #BTCB and airdropped proportionally to stakers.
5️⃣ Users get back their full BNB principal at the end of the quarter.
Key Benefits:
Users earn BTCB rewards while keeping their BNB safe.
@BNB Chain preserves quarterly burn integrity without requiring users to sacrifice capital.
Strengthens #BNBChain engagement and creates a transparent, gamified yield event.
Custody is managed within #Binance , minimizing DeFi risk, while voting and proofs remain on-chain.
Transparency & Safety:
On-chain voting for reward token selection.
Quarterly snapshots: BNB staked, yield generated, BTCB airdropped, burn proof.
Optional Merkle proof for verifying airdrop accuracy.
💡 The Result:
BNB burns continue as scheduled
Stakers earn BTCB yield
Participants retain principal
Binance fosters engagement and community-driven deflation
This is not just a burn, it’s a community-powered, yield-driven BNB celebration.
@Yi He
See original
There is currently a blockchain that is barely surviving on "borrowed time". Overhyped and over-leveraged, the situation is almost reminiscent of the LUNA collapse. When the cracks truly appear, its scale of collapse may be greater than ever before... Perhaps it will become the first domino to trigger this bear market.
Stay tuned.⏳
Stay tuned.⏳
Back in January 2018, $QRL reached an all-time high of $3.04, and today it’s trading around $2.40 ,already at 78.7% of its previous peak, just 27% away from a full breakout.
🚀 What makes this even more exciting is that #QuantumResistantLedger (QRL) isn’t just another blockchain chasing hype ,it’s the only proven, production-ready post-quantum secure blockchain, built to withstand the kind of quantum computing threats that could one day break traditional cryptography.
⚛️ As the world inches closer to the quantum era, QRL’s technology positions it as a true pioneer a project designed not just for today’s crypto landscape but for the next generation of security and decentralization.
With its price heating up and fundamentals stronger than ever, the question isn’t if QRL will reclaim its ATH, it’s when.
💎 #QRL #QuantumSecurity #BinanceSquare
🚀 What makes this even more exciting is that #QuantumResistantLedger (QRL) isn’t just another blockchain chasing hype ,it’s the only proven, production-ready post-quantum secure blockchain, built to withstand the kind of quantum computing threats that could one day break traditional cryptography.
⚛️ As the world inches closer to the quantum era, QRL’s technology positions it as a true pioneer a project designed not just for today’s crypto landscape but for the next generation of security and decentralization.
With its price heating up and fundamentals stronger than ever, the question isn’t if QRL will reclaim its ATH, it’s when.
💎 #QRL #QuantumSecurity #BinanceSquare
$QRL
#QRL
#QRL
The only FULLY Quantum Resistant Chain is coming back to life as investors seek a post quantum safe haven.
#QRL
#QRL
The only FULLY Quantum Resistant Chain is coming back to life as investors seek a post quantum safe haven.
#QRL
#QRL
INTEL: #Google has released an #AI -powered payments protocol with #stablecoin support, partnering with #coinbase and Salesforce
Via #santimentfeed
The highly anticipated FOMC meetings in the US kick off today, and will conclude tomorrow with an anticipated result of interest rates being cut by 25bps.
👀
We are seeing the impact of this in #bitcoin 's social metrics. Bullish comments are outnumbering bearish comments, making up 64% of comments across social media. This is the highest ratio of crowd greed since July 10th.
😱
Historically, markets move the opposite direction of retail's expectations. This doesn't necessarily mean $BTC & #altcoins are due for a correction simply because the crowd is leaning bullish. But it does mean that expectations should be tempered of a huge surge after rate cuts are confirmed tomorrow. And if the unexpected happens, and rates are not cut, there could be a quick correction that catches retailers off guard.
The highly anticipated FOMC meetings in the US kick off today, and will conclude tomorrow with an anticipated result of interest rates being cut by 25bps.
👀
We are seeing the impact of this in #bitcoin 's social metrics. Bullish comments are outnumbering bearish comments, making up 64% of comments across social media. This is the highest ratio of crowd greed since July 10th.
😱
Historically, markets move the opposite direction of retail's expectations. This doesn't necessarily mean $BTC & #altcoins are due for a correction simply because the crowd is leaning bullish. But it does mean that expectations should be tempered of a huge surge after rate cuts are confirmed tomorrow. And if the unexpected happens, and rates are not cut, there could be a quick correction that catches retailers off guard.
@CharlieEriksen
This supply chain attack that occurred yesterday evening is interesting. #Exfil through #Github actions? Exfil through webhook[.]site? We have no business being so lucky to have another attacker fumble HARD.
Using webhook[.]site (free tier = public logs + strict rate limits) for exfil?
🤦♂️
This supply chain attack that occurred yesterday evening is interesting. #Exfil through #Github actions? Exfil through webhook[.]site? We have no business being so lucky to have another attacker fumble HARD.
Using webhook[.]site (free tier = public logs + strict rate limits) for exfil?
🤦♂️
A massive hack hit 18 popular #JavaScript #npm packages (2B+ weekly downloads), injecting code that #hijacks Web3 wallet transactions like #MetaMask and #Phantom .
Massive #npm Breach Hijacks Crypto Wallets Through Common JavaScript Libraries
A widespread supply chain attack hit 18 popular npm packages—such as #chalk , #debug , and ansi-styles—with over 2 billion weekly downloads affected. Hackers hijacked a maintainer’s account and injected code that subtly alters crypto transaction details in browser wallets like #MetaMask and #Phantom , sending funds to attackers while presenting legitimate addresses to users. The breach was caught within minutes and disclosed within an hour. Developers should urgently roll back affected packages, audit recent updates, and remain alert to suspicious wallet behavior.
Why This Matters
Supply chain vulnerabilities: Malware in foundational libraries can ripple across countless projects.
Wallet-level manipulation: Users may unknowingly approve malicious transactions—despite interacting with vetted dApps or libraries.
Rapid detection: Quick response minimized damage—but the sheer scale highlights how precarious the JavaScript ecosystem can be.
A widespread supply chain attack hit 18 popular npm packages—such as #chalk , #debug , and ansi-styles—with over 2 billion weekly downloads affected. Hackers hijacked a maintainer’s account and injected code that subtly alters crypto transaction details in browser wallets like #MetaMask and #Phantom , sending funds to attackers while presenting legitimate addresses to users. The breach was caught within minutes and disclosed within an hour. Developers should urgently roll back affected packages, audit recent updates, and remain alert to suspicious wallet behavior.
Why This Matters
Supply chain vulnerabilities: Malware in foundational libraries can ripple across countless projects.
Wallet-level manipulation: Users may unknowingly approve malicious transactions—despite interacting with vetted dApps or libraries.
Rapid detection: Quick response minimized damage—but the sheer scale highlights how precarious the JavaScript ecosystem can be.
#Intel : Hackers hijacked NPM packages in what’s being called the largest supply chain attack ever, redirecting crypto transactions to attacker wallets.
Ledger CTO warns hardware wallet users to verify every transaction and advises others to avoid web-based onchain activity until its patched
Ledger CTO warns hardware wallet users to verify every transaction and advises others to avoid web-based onchain activity until its patched
It appears the #solana project '#Aqua ' has likely rug pulled 21.77K $SOL ($4.65M) after being promoted by teams such as #Meteora , #QuillAudits , #Helius , SYMMIO, Dialect, and many influencers.
A few hours ago the funds were split four ways and transferred between intermediary addresses before being sent to multiple instant exchanges.
The team has since turned off replies on X (Twitter) for all posts.
Presale address
####4Ea23VxEGAgfbtauQZz11aKNtzHJwb84ppsg3Cz14u6q#####
A few hours ago the funds were split four ways and transferred between intermediary addresses before being sent to multiple instant exchanges.
The team has since turned off replies on X (Twitter) for all posts.
Presale address
####4Ea23VxEGAgfbtauQZz11aKNtzHJwb84ppsg3Cz14u6q#####
Why does a $1B sell dump the market, but a $3B buy barely moves price?
A lot of people wonder how it’s possible that huge sells make #bitcoin charts bleed red instantly, while massive buys (like Saylor scooping billions) don’t send it pumping. Here’s why 👇
1️⃣ Execution Style Matters
Market Sell: If someone market-dumps $1B on exchanges, it eats through the buy-side order book → instant red candles.
OTC / Limit Buy: Institutions usually buy through OTC desks or place gradual limit orders. That BTC never hits the exchange books, so the price barely flinches.
2️⃣ Market Depth & Liquidity
Order books aren’t balanced. The buy side is thinner than the sell side most of the time.
A sudden sell slams the thin liquidity → price drops hard.
A big buy is absorbed more smoothly, especially if spread out over time.
3️⃣ Sentiment Effect
A whale dump = panic. Traders see red candles and sell even more → magnifying the drop.
A whale buy isn’t visible on charts unless it’s aggressive. No “green panic” effect.
4️⃣ Off-Exchange Buys
When guys like #Saylor buy billions, it’s usually direct from miners or OTC brokers. That means:
Supply leaves circulation.
No immediate pressure on spot charts.
✅ Bottom line:
It’s not manipulation it’s just how execution works. Sells are loud, buys are quiet. That’s why $1B dumped can nuke the market, but $3B accumulated OTC barely moves the needle.
$BTC
1️⃣ Execution Style Matters
Market Sell: If someone market-dumps $1B on exchanges, it eats through the buy-side order book → instant red candles.
OTC / Limit Buy: Institutions usually buy through OTC desks or place gradual limit orders. That BTC never hits the exchange books, so the price barely flinches.
2️⃣ Market Depth & Liquidity
Order books aren’t balanced. The buy side is thinner than the sell side most of the time.
A sudden sell slams the thin liquidity → price drops hard.
A big buy is absorbed more smoothly, especially if spread out over time.
3️⃣ Sentiment Effect
A whale dump = panic. Traders see red candles and sell even more → magnifying the drop.
A whale buy isn’t visible on charts unless it’s aggressive. No “green panic” effect.
4️⃣ Off-Exchange Buys
When guys like #Saylor buy billions, it’s usually direct from miners or OTC brokers. That means:
Supply leaves circulation.
No immediate pressure on spot charts.
✅ Bottom line:
It’s not manipulation it’s just how execution works. Sells are loud, buys are quiet. That’s why $1B dumped can nuke the market, but $3B accumulated OTC barely moves the needle.
$BTC
SEC reviews a proposal to make #bitcoin and #crypto #QuantumResistant .
#QuantumResistantLedger is safe. $QRL
#QuantumResistantLedger is safe. $QRL
A Search for a Post-Quantum Era Blockchain
The cryptocurrency world has been shaken in recent weeks. A Bitcoin OG whale from the Satoshi era began moving and liquidating long-dormant BTC for Ethereum. Meanwhile, El Salvador, once proud to hold all of its state Bitcoin in a single wallet, has quietly distributed 500 BTC across multiple wallets.
Why? Both actions stem from the same concern: the quantum computing threat is no longer theoretical, it’s becoming imminent.
Whales and governments alike are realizing that once large-scale quantum machines arrive, Bitcoin’s ECDSA-based security can be shattered and funds could be drained instantly. And because Bitcoin’s decentralized governance makes network-wide upgrades slow, consensus might not arrive until it’s too late. Ethereum, while also vulnerable, has a faster-moving community that some believe will adapt quicker.
But let’s step back. If Bitcoin and Ethereum remain quantum-exposed, are there any blockchains that already solve the problem?
The answer: yes. There is one blockchain today that is 100% quantum-resistant—#QuantumResistantLedger ( $QRL ).
⚔️ The Quantum Threat Is Real
Shor’s Algorithm → threatens all elliptic curve and RSA-based cryptography (used in Bitcoin, Ethereum, Algorand wallets).
Grover’s Algorithm → reduces the strength of hash functions, meaning 128-bit security is no longer enough; 256-bit is the new minimum.
“Harvest now, decrypt later” → attackers can collect encrypted or signed data today and decrypt it once quantum power arrives.
These realities explain why large holders are moving funds and why nations like El Salvador are changing wallet practices. It’s risk management against an unpredictable timeline.
🛡 Why QRL Is 100% Quantum-Resistant
#QRL was the first blockchain (launched 2018) built entirely for the post-quantum era. Here’s why it stands apart:
XMSS Signatures; QRL uses XMSS (eXtended Merkle Signature Scheme), a hash-based, NIST-approved digital signature scheme. Unlike ECDSA, XMSS cannot be broken by Shor’s algorithm. Security relies on hashes, immune to anything more than Grover’s quadratic speedup.SPHINCS+ Transition; In 2024, NIST finalized SPHINCS+ (FIPS 205) as the first stateless hash-based PQC signature standard. QRL is migrating to SPHINCS+ for better usability while staying fully quantum-secure.No Legacy Baggage; Unlike #Algorand or #Nervos , QRL has never relied on ECDSA. Every wallet, transaction, and protocol component is quantum-hardened from genesis.Audited and Proven; Independent audits (e.g., X41 D-Sec) confirm the robustness of its XMSS implementation. Running live since 2018—longer than any other PQC blockchain experiment.Beyond Currency(a) EVM compatibility (Project Zond): Ethereum dApps can migrate securely.(b) Quantum-secure messaging and contracts natively supported.(c) Addresses are inherently resistant even if public keys are revealed.
⚖️ Why Competitors Aren’t There Yet
🔸 Bitcoin (BTC)
Uses ECDSA, completely broken by Shor’s algorithm.
Wallet public keys become quantum-vulnerable once revealed.
Governance is too slow—upgrading Bitcoin to PQC could take years, risking “too little, too late.”
🔸 Ethereum (ETH)
Same ECDSA issue as Bitcoin.
Faster-moving dev culture means consensus might be reached sooner, but millions of existing wallets remain vulnerable.
Current security: not PQC-proof.
🔸 Algorand (~$1.2B MC) $ALGO
Uses FALCON signatures for block history (good).
But wallets rely on ECDSA, creating a massive weak point.
Not fully PQC.
🔸 Nervos Network (~$586M MC) $CKB
Flexible architecture allows PQC integration.
But current wallets/tokens default to ECDSA.
Still hybrid, not pure quantum-safe.
🔸 QANplatform (~$100M–$200M MC)
Lattice-based PQC promises.
However, nascent mainnet and limited audits.
Not proven in production.
🔸 Cellframe (~$50M–$100M MC)
Uses lattice-based signatures.
But hybrid network integrations dilute quantum security.
Lacks a pure PQC end-to-end design.
🔸 Abelian (<$50M MC)
Privacy-focused, lattice-based PQC.
But low adoption and partial reliance on classical systems.
Too small and unproven to rely on.
Conclusion: All these chains are either hybrid, immature or still dependent on ECDSA. QRL is the only fully implemented, audited and live PQC blockchain.
⚠️ Why Big Holders Are Acting Now
Bitcoin OGs → Liquidating BTC for ETH because they fear being quantum-exposed.
El Salvador → Splitting state-owned Bitcoin into smaller wallets to limit catastrophic loss if one address is broken.
Institutions → Watching closely, knowing that “harvest now, decrypt later” means their security window may already be closing.
This is more than paranoia, it’s a sign that quantum risk is shaping real market behavior.
🏁 The Solution, Today
While Bitcoin and Ethereum await network consensus for upgrades, and while Algorand and Nervos patchwork their PQC layers, QRL already exists:
Fully quantum-resistant today.
Running since 2018 with no PQ vulnerabilities.
Backed by NIST-approved cryptography (XMSS, SPHINCS+).
Ready for dApp and enterprise adoption via Project Zond.
The search for a post-quantum era blockchain ends here.
QRL stands alone as the only chain that is 100% quantum-resistant now, not “someday.”
No funds we exchanged in the quantum resistant wallet to endorse any network. This is purely for user education.
NFA
Why? Both actions stem from the same concern: the quantum computing threat is no longer theoretical, it’s becoming imminent.
Whales and governments alike are realizing that once large-scale quantum machines arrive, Bitcoin’s ECDSA-based security can be shattered and funds could be drained instantly. And because Bitcoin’s decentralized governance makes network-wide upgrades slow, consensus might not arrive until it’s too late. Ethereum, while also vulnerable, has a faster-moving community that some believe will adapt quicker.
But let’s step back. If Bitcoin and Ethereum remain quantum-exposed, are there any blockchains that already solve the problem?
The answer: yes. There is one blockchain today that is 100% quantum-resistant—#QuantumResistantLedger ( $QRL ).
⚔️ The Quantum Threat Is Real
Shor’s Algorithm → threatens all elliptic curve and RSA-based cryptography (used in Bitcoin, Ethereum, Algorand wallets).
Grover’s Algorithm → reduces the strength of hash functions, meaning 128-bit security is no longer enough; 256-bit is the new minimum.
“Harvest now, decrypt later” → attackers can collect encrypted or signed data today and decrypt it once quantum power arrives.
These realities explain why large holders are moving funds and why nations like El Salvador are changing wallet practices. It’s risk management against an unpredictable timeline.
🛡 Why QRL Is 100% Quantum-Resistant
#QRL was the first blockchain (launched 2018) built entirely for the post-quantum era. Here’s why it stands apart:
XMSS Signatures; QRL uses XMSS (eXtended Merkle Signature Scheme), a hash-based, NIST-approved digital signature scheme. Unlike ECDSA, XMSS cannot be broken by Shor’s algorithm. Security relies on hashes, immune to anything more than Grover’s quadratic speedup.SPHINCS+ Transition; In 2024, NIST finalized SPHINCS+ (FIPS 205) as the first stateless hash-based PQC signature standard. QRL is migrating to SPHINCS+ for better usability while staying fully quantum-secure.No Legacy Baggage; Unlike #Algorand or #Nervos , QRL has never relied on ECDSA. Every wallet, transaction, and protocol component is quantum-hardened from genesis.Audited and Proven; Independent audits (e.g., X41 D-Sec) confirm the robustness of its XMSS implementation. Running live since 2018—longer than any other PQC blockchain experiment.Beyond Currency(a) EVM compatibility (Project Zond): Ethereum dApps can migrate securely.(b) Quantum-secure messaging and contracts natively supported.(c) Addresses are inherently resistant even if public keys are revealed.
⚖️ Why Competitors Aren’t There Yet
🔸 Bitcoin (BTC)
Uses ECDSA, completely broken by Shor’s algorithm.
Wallet public keys become quantum-vulnerable once revealed.
Governance is too slow—upgrading Bitcoin to PQC could take years, risking “too little, too late.”
🔸 Ethereum (ETH)
Same ECDSA issue as Bitcoin.
Faster-moving dev culture means consensus might be reached sooner, but millions of existing wallets remain vulnerable.
Current security: not PQC-proof.
🔸 Algorand (~$1.2B MC) $ALGO
Uses FALCON signatures for block history (good).
But wallets rely on ECDSA, creating a massive weak point.
Not fully PQC.
🔸 Nervos Network (~$586M MC) $CKB
Flexible architecture allows PQC integration.
But current wallets/tokens default to ECDSA.
Still hybrid, not pure quantum-safe.
🔸 QANplatform (~$100M–$200M MC)
Lattice-based PQC promises.
However, nascent mainnet and limited audits.
Not proven in production.
🔸 Cellframe (~$50M–$100M MC)
Uses lattice-based signatures.
But hybrid network integrations dilute quantum security.
Lacks a pure PQC end-to-end design.
🔸 Abelian (<$50M MC)
Privacy-focused, lattice-based PQC.
But low adoption and partial reliance on classical systems.
Too small and unproven to rely on.
Conclusion: All these chains are either hybrid, immature or still dependent on ECDSA. QRL is the only fully implemented, audited and live PQC blockchain.
⚠️ Why Big Holders Are Acting Now
Bitcoin OGs → Liquidating BTC for ETH because they fear being quantum-exposed.
El Salvador → Splitting state-owned Bitcoin into smaller wallets to limit catastrophic loss if one address is broken.
Institutions → Watching closely, knowing that “harvest now, decrypt later” means their security window may already be closing.
This is more than paranoia, it’s a sign that quantum risk is shaping real market behavior.
🏁 The Solution, Today
While Bitcoin and Ethereum await network consensus for upgrades, and while Algorand and Nervos patchwork their PQC layers, QRL already exists:
Fully quantum-resistant today.
Running since 2018 with no PQ vulnerabilities.
Backed by NIST-approved cryptography (XMSS, SPHINCS+).
Ready for dApp and enterprise adoption via Project Zond.
The search for a post-quantum era blockchain ends here.
QRL stands alone as the only chain that is 100% quantum-resistant now, not “someday.”
No funds we exchanged in the quantum resistant wallet to endorse any network. This is purely for user education.
NFA
This is why $BTC whales have been moving their #bitcoin around to new post quantum wallets or liquidating them.
A Search for a Post-Quantum Era Blockchain
The cryptocurrency world has been shaken in recent weeks. A Bitcoin OG whale from the Satoshi era began moving and liquidating long-dormant BTC for Ethereum. Meanwhile, El Salvador, once proud to hold all of its state Bitcoin in a single wallet, has quietly distributed 500 BTC across multiple wallets.
Why? Both actions stem from the same concern: the quantum computing threat is no longer theoretical, it’s becoming imminent.
Whales and governments alike are realizing that once large-scale quantum machines arrive, Bitcoin’s ECDSA-based security can be shattered and funds could be drained instantly. And because Bitcoin’s decentralized governance makes network-wide upgrades slow, consensus might not arrive until it’s too late. Ethereum, while also vulnerable, has a faster-moving community that some believe will adapt quicker.
But let’s step back. If Bitcoin and Ethereum remain quantum-exposed, are there any blockchains that already solve the problem?
The answer: yes. There is one blockchain today that is 100% quantum-resistant—#QuantumResistantLedger ( $QRL ).
⚔️ The Quantum Threat Is Real
Shor’s Algorithm → threatens all elliptic curve and RSA-based cryptography (used in Bitcoin, Ethereum, Algorand wallets).
Grover’s Algorithm → reduces the strength of hash functions, meaning 128-bit security is no longer enough; 256-bit is the new minimum.
“Harvest now, decrypt later” → attackers can collect encrypted or signed data today and decrypt it once quantum power arrives.
These realities explain why large holders are moving funds and why nations like El Salvador are changing wallet practices. It’s risk management against an unpredictable timeline.
🛡 Why QRL Is 100% Quantum-Resistant
#QRL was the first blockchain (launched 2018) built entirely for the post-quantum era. Here’s why it stands apart:
XMSS Signatures; QRL uses XMSS (eXtended Merkle Signature Scheme), a hash-based, NIST-approved digital signature scheme. Unlike ECDSA, XMSS cannot be broken by Shor’s algorithm. Security relies on hashes, immune to anything more than Grover’s quadratic speedup.SPHINCS+ Transition; In 2024, NIST finalized SPHINCS+ (FIPS 205) as the first stateless hash-based PQC signature standard. QRL is migrating to SPHINCS+ for better usability while staying fully quantum-secure.No Legacy Baggage; Unlike #Algorand or #Nervos , QRL has never relied on ECDSA. Every wallet, transaction, and protocol component is quantum-hardened from genesis.Audited and Proven; Independent audits (e.g., X41 D-Sec) confirm the robustness of its XMSS implementation. Running live since 2018—longer than any other PQC blockchain experiment.Beyond Currency(a) EVM compatibility (Project Zond): Ethereum dApps can migrate securely.(b) Quantum-secure messaging and contracts natively supported.(c) Addresses are inherently resistant even if public keys are revealed.
⚖️ Why Competitors Aren’t There Yet
🔸 Bitcoin (BTC)
Uses ECDSA, completely broken by Shor’s algorithm.
Wallet public keys become quantum-vulnerable once revealed.
Governance is too slow—upgrading Bitcoin to PQC could take years, risking “too little, too late.”
🔸 Ethereum (ETH)
Same ECDSA issue as Bitcoin.
Faster-moving dev culture means consensus might be reached sooner, but millions of existing wallets remain vulnerable.
Current security: not PQC-proof.
🔸 Algorand (~$1.2B MC) $ALGO
Uses FALCON signatures for block history (good).
But wallets rely on ECDSA, creating a massive weak point.
Not fully PQC.
🔸 Nervos Network (~$586M MC) $CKB
Flexible architecture allows PQC integration.
But current wallets/tokens default to ECDSA.
Still hybrid, not pure quantum-safe.
🔸 QANplatform (~$100M–$200M MC)
Lattice-based PQC promises.
However, nascent mainnet and limited audits.
Not proven in production.
🔸 Cellframe (~$50M–$100M MC)
Uses lattice-based signatures.
But hybrid network integrations dilute quantum security.
Lacks a pure PQC end-to-end design.
🔸 Abelian (<$50M MC)
Privacy-focused, lattice-based PQC.
But low adoption and partial reliance on classical systems.
Too small and unproven to rely on.
Conclusion: All these chains are either hybrid, immature or still dependent on ECDSA. QRL is the only fully implemented, audited and live PQC blockchain.
⚠️ Why Big Holders Are Acting Now
Bitcoin OGs → Liquidating BTC for ETH because they fear being quantum-exposed.
El Salvador → Splitting state-owned Bitcoin into smaller wallets to limit catastrophic loss if one address is broken.
Institutions → Watching closely, knowing that “harvest now, decrypt later” means their security window may already be closing.
This is more than paranoia, it’s a sign that quantum risk is shaping real market behavior.
🏁 The Solution, Today
While Bitcoin and Ethereum await network consensus for upgrades, and while Algorand and Nervos patchwork their PQC layers, QRL already exists:
Fully quantum-resistant today.
Running since 2018 with no PQ vulnerabilities.
Backed by NIST-approved cryptography (XMSS, SPHINCS+).
Ready for dApp and enterprise adoption via Project Zond.
The search for a post-quantum era blockchain ends here.
QRL stands alone as the only chain that is 100% quantum-resistant now, not “someday.”
No funds we exchanged in the quantum resistant wallet to endorse any network. This is purely for user education.
NFA
Why? Both actions stem from the same concern: the quantum computing threat is no longer theoretical, it’s becoming imminent.
Whales and governments alike are realizing that once large-scale quantum machines arrive, Bitcoin’s ECDSA-based security can be shattered and funds could be drained instantly. And because Bitcoin’s decentralized governance makes network-wide upgrades slow, consensus might not arrive until it’s too late. Ethereum, while also vulnerable, has a faster-moving community that some believe will adapt quicker.
But let’s step back. If Bitcoin and Ethereum remain quantum-exposed, are there any blockchains that already solve the problem?
The answer: yes. There is one blockchain today that is 100% quantum-resistant—#QuantumResistantLedger ( $QRL ).
⚔️ The Quantum Threat Is Real
Shor’s Algorithm → threatens all elliptic curve and RSA-based cryptography (used in Bitcoin, Ethereum, Algorand wallets).
Grover’s Algorithm → reduces the strength of hash functions, meaning 128-bit security is no longer enough; 256-bit is the new minimum.
“Harvest now, decrypt later” → attackers can collect encrypted or signed data today and decrypt it once quantum power arrives.
These realities explain why large holders are moving funds and why nations like El Salvador are changing wallet practices. It’s risk management against an unpredictable timeline.
🛡 Why QRL Is 100% Quantum-Resistant
#QRL was the first blockchain (launched 2018) built entirely for the post-quantum era. Here’s why it stands apart:
XMSS Signatures; QRL uses XMSS (eXtended Merkle Signature Scheme), a hash-based, NIST-approved digital signature scheme. Unlike ECDSA, XMSS cannot be broken by Shor’s algorithm. Security relies on hashes, immune to anything more than Grover’s quadratic speedup.SPHINCS+ Transition; In 2024, NIST finalized SPHINCS+ (FIPS 205) as the first stateless hash-based PQC signature standard. QRL is migrating to SPHINCS+ for better usability while staying fully quantum-secure.No Legacy Baggage; Unlike #Algorand or #Nervos , QRL has never relied on ECDSA. Every wallet, transaction, and protocol component is quantum-hardened from genesis.Audited and Proven; Independent audits (e.g., X41 D-Sec) confirm the robustness of its XMSS implementation. Running live since 2018—longer than any other PQC blockchain experiment.Beyond Currency(a) EVM compatibility (Project Zond): Ethereum dApps can migrate securely.(b) Quantum-secure messaging and contracts natively supported.(c) Addresses are inherently resistant even if public keys are revealed.
⚖️ Why Competitors Aren’t There Yet
🔸 Bitcoin (BTC)
Uses ECDSA, completely broken by Shor’s algorithm.
Wallet public keys become quantum-vulnerable once revealed.
Governance is too slow—upgrading Bitcoin to PQC could take years, risking “too little, too late.”
🔸 Ethereum (ETH)
Same ECDSA issue as Bitcoin.
Faster-moving dev culture means consensus might be reached sooner, but millions of existing wallets remain vulnerable.
Current security: not PQC-proof.
🔸 Algorand (~$1.2B MC) $ALGO
Uses FALCON signatures for block history (good).
But wallets rely on ECDSA, creating a massive weak point.
Not fully PQC.
🔸 Nervos Network (~$586M MC) $CKB
Flexible architecture allows PQC integration.
But current wallets/tokens default to ECDSA.
Still hybrid, not pure quantum-safe.
🔸 QANplatform (~$100M–$200M MC)
Lattice-based PQC promises.
However, nascent mainnet and limited audits.
Not proven in production.
🔸 Cellframe (~$50M–$100M MC)
Uses lattice-based signatures.
But hybrid network integrations dilute quantum security.
Lacks a pure PQC end-to-end design.
🔸 Abelian (<$50M MC)
Privacy-focused, lattice-based PQC.
But low adoption and partial reliance on classical systems.
Too small and unproven to rely on.
Conclusion: All these chains are either hybrid, immature or still dependent on ECDSA. QRL is the only fully implemented, audited and live PQC blockchain.
⚠️ Why Big Holders Are Acting Now
Bitcoin OGs → Liquidating BTC for ETH because they fear being quantum-exposed.
El Salvador → Splitting state-owned Bitcoin into smaller wallets to limit catastrophic loss if one address is broken.
Institutions → Watching closely, knowing that “harvest now, decrypt later” means their security window may already be closing.
This is more than paranoia, it’s a sign that quantum risk is shaping real market behavior.
🏁 The Solution, Today
While Bitcoin and Ethereum await network consensus for upgrades, and while Algorand and Nervos patchwork their PQC layers, QRL already exists:
Fully quantum-resistant today.
Running since 2018 with no PQ vulnerabilities.
Backed by NIST-approved cryptography (XMSS, SPHINCS+).
Ready for dApp and enterprise adoption via Project Zond.
The search for a post-quantum era blockchain ends here.
QRL stands alone as the only chain that is 100% quantum-resistant now, not “someday.”
No funds we exchanged in the quantum resistant wallet to endorse any network. This is purely for user education.
NFA
An article was published using OP_RETURN.
" .......................
Inputs & Outputs
bc1pde3lm4hccx9nafqdnhzkrrnsxrz4d2sdxlf0e5xwhg4cluxe5zqq80ts76
0.00972412 BTC
bc1pfc3ed24v2pv9wdl27ddl4pmfrxmmk038qvtz5jhavqv5zrmq4qaq6ns46f
0.00928922 BTCOP_RETURN Cypherpunks used to dream of true disruption. Many still do, but many have also tempered their aspirations and imagination. Most things being built in this space these days are basic consumer applicShow less0.00000000 BTCCypherpunks used to dream of true disruption. Many still do, but many have also tempered their aspirations and imagination. Most things being built in this space these days are basic consumer applications. New payments tools, new marketplaces for digital assets and collectibles, ways to scale more payments tools, etc. Nothing has been done in a while to truly rock the boat in a new way. The last thing produced in this space that truly did that is probably the last thing anyone would think I would say: Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). Say what you want about them, but it truly shook up the world order. 99.99% of ICOs were impractical scams, pump-and-dump schemes, or outright fraud. But they shattered barriers, they broke down moats. They let anyone, anywhere, invest in anything, with no legal frameworks being applied (or even enforceable, depending on the jurisdictions issuers operated from). A lot of the last few years has just produced more ways to integrate with the old order, to placate them, to adapt to them rather than vice versa. There isn’t much driving at disrupting the old order. The spark seems mostly gone. Let’s try and find it looking at infamous cypherpunk Jim Bell’s idea for disrupting the system: assassination markets. Jim Bell proposed the concept in his 1995-96 essay “Assassination Politics” published on USENET. Its core premise was aligning incentives through the use of a prediction market where participants would wager on the date that certain individuals would die. The idea was that market actors who placed large bets on certain dates would therefore have an economic incentive to bring about that individual’s death somehow, directly or indirectly. As the pot of money grew for a specific individual, eventually it would grow large enough (at least that was the idea) that someone would act and actually arrange for the individual’s death, if not take care of it themselves. This is technically possible to do now with Bitcoin privacy tools and trustworthy oracles. All you need is tools to keep your bets (or winnings) in bitcoin anonymous, and oracles people will trust to disperse funds honestly after a “victim’s” death. This is obviously a highly unethical, immoral, and wildly dangerous idea. But it’s also a powerful one, and revolutionary. A successful assassination market working at scale would radically alter the calculus of the governing interacting with the governed. How different would the world be if leaders had to weigh the risk of inciting an evergrowing pot of money incentivizing their untimely demise if they did something unpopular or detrimental to those they governed? Obviously in the real world, building an assassination market is insane, if you can find oracles that wouldn’t just steal the money and run. But it’s conceptually possible. What happened to thinking about ways to actually disrupt? To resist and overturn the existing order? Jim Bell also had a second, less extreme, idea: Federal “Justice” Shutdown. While everyone has a right to a trial by jury, almost no one criminally prosecuted actually goes to trial. Most people plead guilty or take a plea deal to escape the risk of harsher sentences at trial. Mr. Bell proposed crowdfunding money to pay attorney’s fees for anyone being charged with a victimless crime to go to trial. The idea was to subject the federal court system to a Denial of Service attack. Without the vast majority of people taking deals or pleading guilty, the federal court system would not have the resources to hear all of these trials in a timely fashion. It would clog up the court system. This could be used as leverage to force the government to repeal illogical laws surrounding victimless crimes. This is possible right now with nothing more than basic Bitcoin wallet software and internet communications channels. It’s not as cool or “wow” in a gritty cyberpunk fashion, but just like his original assassination market idea, it could have a profound impact on resisting and upending the old order. Cypherpunks need to dream of true disruption again. People can do all kinds of things if they want to, they just need to imagine them first......" $BTC
Inputs & Outputs
bc1pde3lm4hccx9nafqdnhzkrrnsxrz4d2sdxlf0e5xwhg4cluxe5zqq80ts76
0.00972412 BTC
bc1pfc3ed24v2pv9wdl27ddl4pmfrxmmk038qvtz5jhavqv5zrmq4qaq6ns46f
0.00928922 BTCOP_RETURN Cypherpunks used to dream of true disruption. Many still do, but many have also tempered their aspirations and imagination. Most things being built in this space these days are basic consumer applicShow less0.00000000 BTCCypherpunks used to dream of true disruption. Many still do, but many have also tempered their aspirations and imagination. Most things being built in this space these days are basic consumer applications. New payments tools, new marketplaces for digital assets and collectibles, ways to scale more payments tools, etc. Nothing has been done in a while to truly rock the boat in a new way. The last thing produced in this space that truly did that is probably the last thing anyone would think I would say: Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). Say what you want about them, but it truly shook up the world order. 99.99% of ICOs were impractical scams, pump-and-dump schemes, or outright fraud. But they shattered barriers, they broke down moats. They let anyone, anywhere, invest in anything, with no legal frameworks being applied (or even enforceable, depending on the jurisdictions issuers operated from). A lot of the last few years has just produced more ways to integrate with the old order, to placate them, to adapt to them rather than vice versa. There isn’t much driving at disrupting the old order. The spark seems mostly gone. Let’s try and find it looking at infamous cypherpunk Jim Bell’s idea for disrupting the system: assassination markets. Jim Bell proposed the concept in his 1995-96 essay “Assassination Politics” published on USENET. Its core premise was aligning incentives through the use of a prediction market where participants would wager on the date that certain individuals would die. The idea was that market actors who placed large bets on certain dates would therefore have an economic incentive to bring about that individual’s death somehow, directly or indirectly. As the pot of money grew for a specific individual, eventually it would grow large enough (at least that was the idea) that someone would act and actually arrange for the individual’s death, if not take care of it themselves. This is technically possible to do now with Bitcoin privacy tools and trustworthy oracles. All you need is tools to keep your bets (or winnings) in bitcoin anonymous, and oracles people will trust to disperse funds honestly after a “victim’s” death. This is obviously a highly unethical, immoral, and wildly dangerous idea. But it’s also a powerful one, and revolutionary. A successful assassination market working at scale would radically alter the calculus of the governing interacting with the governed. How different would the world be if leaders had to weigh the risk of inciting an evergrowing pot of money incentivizing their untimely demise if they did something unpopular or detrimental to those they governed? Obviously in the real world, building an assassination market is insane, if you can find oracles that wouldn’t just steal the money and run. But it’s conceptually possible. What happened to thinking about ways to actually disrupt? To resist and overturn the existing order? Jim Bell also had a second, less extreme, idea: Federal “Justice” Shutdown. While everyone has a right to a trial by jury, almost no one criminally prosecuted actually goes to trial. Most people plead guilty or take a plea deal to escape the risk of harsher sentences at trial. Mr. Bell proposed crowdfunding money to pay attorney’s fees for anyone being charged with a victimless crime to go to trial. The idea was to subject the federal court system to a Denial of Service attack. Without the vast majority of people taking deals or pleading guilty, the federal court system would not have the resources to hear all of these trials in a timely fashion. It would clog up the court system. This could be used as leverage to force the government to repeal illogical laws surrounding victimless crimes. This is possible right now with nothing more than basic Bitcoin wallet software and internet communications channels. It’s not as cool or “wow” in a gritty cyberpunk fashion, but just like his original assassination market idea, it could have a profound impact on resisting and upending the old order. Cypherpunks need to dream of true disruption again. People can do all kinds of things if they want to, they just need to imagine them first......" $BTC
#Huawei entered the GPU market with cheaper options for the Huawei Atlas 300I Duo, these are 96GB VRAM GPUs for under $2000. Not as fast as #NVIDIA ’s top GPUs, but:
>Can run 70B models locally without offloading
>Compact & power-efficient (150W TDP)
>Software support already exists (llama.cpp + torch-npu)
The trade-off? Lower memory bandwidth and slower throughput. But for anyone bottlenecked by VRAM, this is a breakthrough.
Bottom line: It’s not replacing a 4090 for speed, but it might just be the budget king for massive local LLMs.
#AI
>Can run 70B models locally without offloading
>Compact & power-efficient (150W TDP)
>Software support already exists (llama.cpp + torch-npu)
The trade-off? Lower memory bandwidth and slower throughput. But for anyone bottlenecked by VRAM, this is a breakthrough.
Bottom line: It’s not replacing a 4090 for speed, but it might just be the budget king for massive local LLMs.
#AI
A Search for a Post-Quantum Era Blockchain
The cryptocurrency world has been shaken in recent weeks. A Bitcoin OG whale from the Satoshi era began moving and liquidating long-dormant BTC for Ethereum. Meanwhile, El Salvador, once proud to hold all of its state Bitcoin in a single wallet, has quietly distributed 500 BTC across multiple wallets.
Why? Both actions stem from the same concern: the quantum computing threat is no longer theoretical, it’s becoming imminent.
Whales and governments alike are realizing that once large-scale quantum machines arrive, Bitcoin’s ECDSA-based security can be shattered and funds could be drained instantly. And because Bitcoin’s decentralized governance makes network-wide upgrades slow, consensus might not arrive until it’s too late. Ethereum, while also vulnerable, has a faster-moving community that some believe will adapt quicker.
But let’s step back. If Bitcoin and Ethereum remain quantum-exposed, are there any blockchains that already solve the problem?
The answer: yes. There is one blockchain today that is 100% quantum-resistant—#QuantumResistantLedger ( $QRL ).
⚔️ The Quantum Threat Is Real
Shor’s Algorithm → threatens all elliptic curve and RSA-based cryptography (used in Bitcoin, Ethereum, Algorand wallets).
Grover’s Algorithm → reduces the strength of hash functions, meaning 128-bit security is no longer enough; 256-bit is the new minimum.
“Harvest now, decrypt later” → attackers can collect encrypted or signed data today and decrypt it once quantum power arrives.
These realities explain why large holders are moving funds and why nations like El Salvador are changing wallet practices. It’s risk management against an unpredictable timeline.
🛡 Why QRL Is 100% Quantum-Resistant
#QRL was the first blockchain (launched 2018) built entirely for the post-quantum era. Here’s why it stands apart:
XMSS Signatures; QRL uses XMSS (eXtended Merkle Signature Scheme), a hash-based, NIST-approved digital signature scheme. Unlike ECDSA, XMSS cannot be broken by Shor’s algorithm. Security relies on hashes, immune to anything more than Grover’s quadratic speedup.SPHINCS+ Transition; In 2024, NIST finalized SPHINCS+ (FIPS 205) as the first stateless hash-based PQC signature standard. QRL is migrating to SPHINCS+ for better usability while staying fully quantum-secure.No Legacy Baggage; Unlike #Algorand or #Nervos , QRL has never relied on ECDSA. Every wallet, transaction, and protocol component is quantum-hardened from genesis.Audited and Proven; Independent audits (e.g., X41 D-Sec) confirm the robustness of its XMSS implementation. Running live since 2018—longer than any other PQC blockchain experiment.Beyond Currency(a) EVM compatibility (Project Zond): Ethereum dApps can migrate securely.(b) Quantum-secure messaging and contracts natively supported.(c) Addresses are inherently resistant even if public keys are revealed.
⚖️ Why Competitors Aren’t There Yet
🔸 Bitcoin (BTC)
Uses ECDSA, completely broken by Shor’s algorithm.
Wallet public keys become quantum-vulnerable once revealed.
Governance is too slow—upgrading Bitcoin to PQC could take years, risking “too little, too late.”
🔸 Ethereum (ETH)
Same ECDSA issue as Bitcoin.
Faster-moving dev culture means consensus might be reached sooner, but millions of existing wallets remain vulnerable.
Current security: not PQC-proof.
🔸 Algorand (~$1.2B MC) $ALGO
Uses FALCON signatures for block history (good).
But wallets rely on ECDSA, creating a massive weak point.
Not fully PQC.
🔸 Nervos Network (~$586M MC) $CKB
Flexible architecture allows PQC integration.
But current wallets/tokens default to ECDSA.
Still hybrid, not pure quantum-safe.
🔸 QANplatform (~$100M–$200M MC)
Lattice-based PQC promises.
However, nascent mainnet and limited audits.
Not proven in production.
🔸 Cellframe (~$50M–$100M MC)
Uses lattice-based signatures.
But hybrid network integrations dilute quantum security.
Lacks a pure PQC end-to-end design.
🔸 Abelian (<$50M MC)
Privacy-focused, lattice-based PQC.
But low adoption and partial reliance on classical systems.
Too small and unproven to rely on.
Conclusion: All these chains are either hybrid, immature or still dependent on ECDSA. QRL is the only fully implemented, audited and live PQC blockchain.
⚠️ Why Big Holders Are Acting Now
Bitcoin OGs → Liquidating BTC for ETH because they fear being quantum-exposed.
El Salvador → Splitting state-owned Bitcoin into smaller wallets to limit catastrophic loss if one address is broken.
Institutions → Watching closely, knowing that “harvest now, decrypt later” means their security window may already be closing.
This is more than paranoia, it’s a sign that quantum risk is shaping real market behavior.
🏁 The Solution, Today
While Bitcoin and Ethereum await network consensus for upgrades, and while Algorand and Nervos patchwork their PQC layers, QRL already exists:
Fully quantum-resistant today.
Running since 2018 with no PQ vulnerabilities.
Backed by NIST-approved cryptography (XMSS, SPHINCS+).
Ready for dApp and enterprise adoption via Project Zond.
The search for a post-quantum era blockchain ends here.
QRL stands alone as the only chain that is 100% quantum-resistant now, not “someday.”
No funds we exchanged in the quantum resistant wallet to endorse any network. This is purely for user education.
NFA
Why? Both actions stem from the same concern: the quantum computing threat is no longer theoretical, it’s becoming imminent.
Whales and governments alike are realizing that once large-scale quantum machines arrive, Bitcoin’s ECDSA-based security can be shattered and funds could be drained instantly. And because Bitcoin’s decentralized governance makes network-wide upgrades slow, consensus might not arrive until it’s too late. Ethereum, while also vulnerable, has a faster-moving community that some believe will adapt quicker.
But let’s step back. If Bitcoin and Ethereum remain quantum-exposed, are there any blockchains that already solve the problem?
The answer: yes. There is one blockchain today that is 100% quantum-resistant—#QuantumResistantLedger ( $QRL ).
⚔️ The Quantum Threat Is Real
Shor’s Algorithm → threatens all elliptic curve and RSA-based cryptography (used in Bitcoin, Ethereum, Algorand wallets).
Grover’s Algorithm → reduces the strength of hash functions, meaning 128-bit security is no longer enough; 256-bit is the new minimum.
“Harvest now, decrypt later” → attackers can collect encrypted or signed data today and decrypt it once quantum power arrives.
These realities explain why large holders are moving funds and why nations like El Salvador are changing wallet practices. It’s risk management against an unpredictable timeline.
🛡 Why QRL Is 100% Quantum-Resistant
#QRL was the first blockchain (launched 2018) built entirely for the post-quantum era. Here’s why it stands apart:
XMSS Signatures; QRL uses XMSS (eXtended Merkle Signature Scheme), a hash-based, NIST-approved digital signature scheme. Unlike ECDSA, XMSS cannot be broken by Shor’s algorithm. Security relies on hashes, immune to anything more than Grover’s quadratic speedup.SPHINCS+ Transition; In 2024, NIST finalized SPHINCS+ (FIPS 205) as the first stateless hash-based PQC signature standard. QRL is migrating to SPHINCS+ for better usability while staying fully quantum-secure.No Legacy Baggage; Unlike #Algorand or #Nervos , QRL has never relied on ECDSA. Every wallet, transaction, and protocol component is quantum-hardened from genesis.Audited and Proven; Independent audits (e.g., X41 D-Sec) confirm the robustness of its XMSS implementation. Running live since 2018—longer than any other PQC blockchain experiment.Beyond Currency(a) EVM compatibility (Project Zond): Ethereum dApps can migrate securely.(b) Quantum-secure messaging and contracts natively supported.(c) Addresses are inherently resistant even if public keys are revealed.
⚖️ Why Competitors Aren’t There Yet
🔸 Bitcoin (BTC)
Uses ECDSA, completely broken by Shor’s algorithm.
Wallet public keys become quantum-vulnerable once revealed.
Governance is too slow—upgrading Bitcoin to PQC could take years, risking “too little, too late.”
🔸 Ethereum (ETH)
Same ECDSA issue as Bitcoin.
Faster-moving dev culture means consensus might be reached sooner, but millions of existing wallets remain vulnerable.
Current security: not PQC-proof.
🔸 Algorand (~$1.2B MC) $ALGO
Uses FALCON signatures for block history (good).
But wallets rely on ECDSA, creating a massive weak point.
Not fully PQC.
🔸 Nervos Network (~$586M MC) $CKB
Flexible architecture allows PQC integration.
But current wallets/tokens default to ECDSA.
Still hybrid, not pure quantum-safe.
🔸 QANplatform (~$100M–$200M MC)
Lattice-based PQC promises.
However, nascent mainnet and limited audits.
Not proven in production.
🔸 Cellframe (~$50M–$100M MC)
Uses lattice-based signatures.
But hybrid network integrations dilute quantum security.
Lacks a pure PQC end-to-end design.
🔸 Abelian (<$50M MC)
Privacy-focused, lattice-based PQC.
But low adoption and partial reliance on classical systems.
Too small and unproven to rely on.
Conclusion: All these chains are either hybrid, immature or still dependent on ECDSA. QRL is the only fully implemented, audited and live PQC blockchain.
⚠️ Why Big Holders Are Acting Now
Bitcoin OGs → Liquidating BTC for ETH because they fear being quantum-exposed.
El Salvador → Splitting state-owned Bitcoin into smaller wallets to limit catastrophic loss if one address is broken.
Institutions → Watching closely, knowing that “harvest now, decrypt later” means their security window may already be closing.
This is more than paranoia, it’s a sign that quantum risk is shaping real market behavior.
🏁 The Solution, Today
While Bitcoin and Ethereum await network consensus for upgrades, and while Algorand and Nervos patchwork their PQC layers, QRL already exists:
Fully quantum-resistant today.
Running since 2018 with no PQ vulnerabilities.
Backed by NIST-approved cryptography (XMSS, SPHINCS+).
Ready for dApp and enterprise adoption via Project Zond.
The search for a post-quantum era blockchain ends here.
QRL stands alone as the only chain that is 100% quantum-resistant now, not “someday.”
No funds we exchanged in the quantum resistant wallet to endorse any network. This is purely for user education.
NFA
Login to explore more contents