KADG - World

📅 December 1 | Washington, D.C., United States
The political debate in the United States reignited when a group of Republican lawmakers revived formal accusations against President Joe Biden’s administration, alleging a deliberate policy to stifle the crypto industry through regulatory and banking pressure.

📖According to The Block, House Republicans have intensified their political offensive against the Biden administration by sending official letters to several federal agencies, including the FDIC, the Federal Reserve, and the OCC, accusing them of engaging in a pattern of actions that they claim has resulted in an increase in debanking cases targeting crypto companies.
They argue that these entities are informally pressuring commercial banks to limit or terminate relationships with companies in the sector, even in the absence of concrete regulatory violations.
They maintain that this behavior is reminiscent of the controversial “Operation Choke Point” of previous years, in which the government was accused of pressuring banks to avoid working with politically sensitive sectors.
In their new offensive, the Republicans cite recent cases of companies whose banking access was frozen or whose applications were rejected without detailed explanations, asserting that this demonstrates that the alleged risk used by the agencies as justification is disproportionate and lacks technical basis.
Lawmakers are demanding transparency regarding internal communications between regulators and financial institutions, seeking evidence of verbal instructions or informal guidance that could induce banks to steer clear of crypto businesses.
They argue that such practices could stifle innovation and push companies toward less stringent jurisdictions, affecting U.S. competitiveness in a rapidly evolving global market.
Several Republicans also maintain that the Biden administration is using the narrative of financial risk to justify covert restrictions, thereby limiting the sector's ability to operate normally and creating an environment of regulatory uncertainty that discourages investment.
While there has been no direct response from the White House, the agencies involved have repeatedly denied the existence of coordinated instructions and assert that any decisions made by banks are based on independent internal assessments.
However, political pressure is mounting, and the revived dispute has once again placed the issue at the center of the national debate, where crypto regulation has become a battleground defining opposing visions for the country's economic and technological future.

Topic Opinion:
The accusation of debanking is serious, because banking access is the lifeblood of any industry. If the rules aren't clear, the sector is left at the mercy of subjective interpretations. I believe that the lack of transparent guidelines fuels distrust and hinders responsible market growth.
💬 Do you think the Biden administration is really holding back the crypto industry?

Leave your comment...
#crypto #debanking #biden #BTC #CryptoNews $BTC

📅 December 1 | Dubai, United Arab Emirates
The most influential figure in the history of crypto exchanges, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), is once again at the center of controversy. According to The Block, the Binance founder was allegedly the target of a board coup attempt within YZi Labs, the firm he controls that manages some of the key infrastructure of the Binance ecosystem.

📖YZi Labs, a company closely linked to Changpeng Zhao, experienced a deep internal rift when a group of executives allegedly attempted to oust individuals from CZ's inner circle involved in the firm's strategic management, particularly in the area that handles operations related to the BNB ecosystem's treasury—a fundamental component for the operation and stability of the Binance Chain and BNB Smart Chain networks.
The investigation indicates that the conflict escalated to such a point that BNC, a specialized analysis firm, was called in to audit movements and assess possible irregularities, and its preliminary report would have detected internal decisions made without explicit authorization and changes in corporate access that raised alarms within the CZ environment, generating the perception that an attempt was being made to reorganize internal power covertly.
As these findings came to light, tensions escalated because several internal sources mentioned that some executives were seeking to control key segments of the operation under the premise that the structure needed to be "modernized," while others interpreted it as a direct attempt to reduce CZ's influence in sensitive areas, including the management of funds that have historically been handled with the founder's utmost closeness.
The disputes affected the company's governance, creating an atmosphere of distrust that prompted emergency meetings to prevent a major organizational breakdown. The situation was so delicate that the possibility of reorganizing the operational structure to protect strategic assets and prevent future attempts at internal restructuring was discussed.
Although CZ has not commented publicly on the incident, sources indicate that his team reacted immediately, reinforcing controls and re-establishing hierarchies. This demonstrates that the founder's influence remains decisive and that any move to alter the chain of command unleashes high-impact tensions in an organization that manages resources critical to the BNB ecosystem.
This episode represents one of the most turbulent moments in the corporate history of entities related to Binance, and although control has been restored, the conflict reveals an unexpected internal fragility that could influence the perception of the ecosystem's governance.

Topic Opinion:
CZ's role has been crucial to the growth of the BNB ecosystem, but he has also created structures that are heavily dependent on his leadership.
💬 Do you think this was really an attempted internal coup against CZ?

Leave your comment...
#CZ #Binance #bnb #YZILabs #CryptoNews $BNB

📅 December 1 | Washington, D.C., United States
At a time when the crypto market seems to be teetering between euphoria and uncertainty, Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, is once again challenging traditional Wall Street logic with statements that are already causing a stir among institutional investors.

📖According to The Block, Michael Saylor reaffirms a strategy based on the absolute conviction that Bitcoin is the best asset ever created and that any form of corporate capital should be geared toward its continuous accumulation.
This vision has not only guided MicroStrategy's decisions but has also driven a model he describes as a treasury policy superior to any traditional instrument. He argues that fiat money inevitably depreciates, while Bitcoin, with its limited supply, captures ever-increasing value, and therefore insists that his mission is to accumulate as much as possible regardless of the market cycle.
Michael Saylor emphasizes that volatility does not represent a material risk but rather an opportunity to strengthen positions. In his view, price pullbacks only serve to accelerate the transfer of wealth to those who understand the technological and monetary value of the asset. He asserts that even with sharp declines, he would never consider selling because doing so would betray his long-term thesis, which he considers unalterable.
Furthermore, it emphasizes that MicroStrategy will continue to use debt and equity issuances as tools to obtain more capital with which to continue buying BTC and stresses that the more the network grows and more institutions adopt the asset, the more justified it is to increase the level of exposure.
His stance is controversial because, while his strategy has multiplied the company's value, it has also made it highly correlated with BTC movements, creating what many analysts call a "leveraged company on a volatile asset."
Even so, Michael Saylor responds that the real risk is not betting on Bitcoin, but rather not betting on it and falling behind in the biggest monetary transition in history.

Topic Opinion:
His conviction has changed the way the corporate world views Bitcoin, but it has also led MicroStrategy to operate in territory where the risk is considerable. I believe his strategy only works for those who deeply understand the technology and have the ability to tolerate extreme volatility.
💬 Do you think his strategy is genius or excessive risk?

Leave your comment...
#bitcoin #MicroStrategy #CryptoNews #BTC #WallStreet $BTC

📅 November 1 | New York, USA
Financial giant JPMorgan has once again sounded the alarm, warning that Bitcoin may be entering a critical point in its bull cycle. The firm didn't talk about simple corrections: it directly mentioned a “late cycle fragility”, an expression that in the crypto ecosystem is equivalent to suggesting that the bottom could be much closer than many believe.

📖JPMorgan argues that Bitcoin is showing increasingly evident symptoms of a market in the late cycle phase, with a structural fragility that isn't reflected in the current price but becomes visible when examining the ecosystem's internal situation.
The demand for stablecoins, a critical leading indicator of liquidity flow, has stopped growing, and this stagnation is concerning because historically, the supply of stablecoins precedes healthy market rallies.
When that supply stops, it indicates that fresh capital isn't flowing in with the same force, thus reducing the real base supporting price gains at a time when euphoria seems more intense than ever.
Added to this is the growing presence of momentum traders, operators who buy solely following the trend and without solid fundamentals, who amplify short-term rises but also cause violent falls when they detect reversal signals or when support levels are broken, thus creating a vulnerable environment where any red candle can trigger chain selling.
Leverage in derivatives continues to increase, and this excessive exposure means that even a moderate shock can trigger automatic liquidations, a phenomenon that in previous cycles wiped out billions in a matter of minutes, especially in environments where liquidity was already limited.
Even the inflows into Bitcoin ETFs, which seem like an encouraging sign, do not compensate for the widespread weakness of the liquidity structure, and the bank raises the possibility that some of these flows correspond to temporary capital rotations rather than genuine and sustained demand.
The combination of all these factors creates a typical late-cycle fragility scenario, where superficial optimism coexists with a weakened base and where any unexpected event could trigger a drastic turn that surprises even the most experienced traders.

Topic Opinion:
We have seen too many times how markets appear strong just before revealing their most fragile side. Cycles are not sustained by euphoria, but by real liquidity, prudence, and structural analysis. I remain convinced of Bitcoin's potential, but also that no asset is above macroeconomic realities and human behavior.
💬 Do you think this late-cycle fragility is real?

Leave your comment...
#bitcoin #JPMorgan #CryptoNews #BTC #CryptoAnalysis $BTC

📅 November 30 | New York, USA
For weeks, a dangerous narrative circulated, setting off alarm bells throughout the market. With the recent drop in the price of Bitcoin, the decline in corporate balance sheets, and the volatility that hit companies holding BTC in their reserves, several analysts began claiming that the digital treasury model was dying.

📖Architect Partners points out that this interpretation is superficial and misguided, as historical data shows that Bitcoin's behavior in the face of macroeconomic shocks is “highly predictable” over long-term horizons.
The firm emphasizes that the real problem is not the asset itself, but rather the unrealistic expectations of those seeking linear returns in a naturally cyclical asset.
According to CoinDesk, the company stresses that Bitcoin remains the only digital asset with proven institutional adoption, an expanding regulatory infrastructure, and liquidity capable of sustaining corporate positions. They also emphasize that the current pullback is part of a normal process in markets with liquidity absorption cycles, especially in years when high interest rates reduce risk appetite.
For Architect Partners, the question has never been whether Bitcoin can weather crises, but rather whether corporations are willing to maintain countercyclical positions, something that is an essential part of any non-traditional treasury model.
The report also highlights that companies adopting Bitcoin did so not for quarterly gains but for ten- or twenty-year preservation strategies linked to their vision for the future of digital currency. Bitcoin was designed to withstand monetary frictions and serve as a hedge against prolonged depreciation of fiat currencies, not to perform under immediate macroeconomic stress.
Architect Partners notes that Tesla, MicroStrategy, and numerous Latin American companies understood this from the outset. Setbacks, in this context, are part of the process and do not indicate a systemic failure of the model.
Another critical point of the analysis is that companies integrating Bitcoin into their treasury experience greater access to global markets, alternative liquidity, and strategic advantages for engaging with digital customers, which is not the case with traditional assets.
Architect Partners concludes that the model strengthens in the long term, especially as more countries adopt regulatory frameworks that legitimize and structure the use of digital assets in corporations. Even during periods of sharp correction, they point out that the model holds up because it's built on deeper economic and technological fundamentals than a single negative quarter.
It's not that the model is broken, it's that it's being viewed through the wrong lenses. When analyzed over short timeframes, Bitcoin appears unsustainable. When analyzed over longer timeframes, the companies that have adopted it demonstrate resilience and strategic vision. What's truly being tested isn't the asset itself, but rather the corporate patience to navigate these cycles.

Topic Opinion:
The Bitcoin treasury model was never designed for those seeking immediate stability, but rather for those who understand how monetary cycles work and how global liquidity behaves. Companies that adopt Bitcoin are playing a long-term game, and in my experience, those who make decisions based on fear-mongering headlines always lose sight of the strategic vision.
💬 What do you think about BTC?

Leave your comment...
#bitcoin #TreasuryCrypto #CryptoNews #BTC #CryptoNewss $BTC

📅 November 30 | Singapore
What promised to be one of the most ambitious launches in the DeFi ecosystem ended up becoming a sudden withdrawal that left developers, investors, and analysts perplexed. Terminal Finance, the DEX incubated by the influential Ethena Labs, decided to officially abandon its launch after Converge Chain, the network on which it was to operate, failed to materialize.

📖Months ago, Ethena spearheaded the idea of ​​creating its own ecosystem, with Terminal Finance as its flagship product. Converge Chain, designed to offer a high-performance environment, integration with derivatives, and a robust security model, was intended to be the core of this architecture.
For weeks, enthusiasm grew, fueled by expectations of massive volumes, integration with synthetic stablecoins, and a roadmap that aimed to make this network a direct competitor to the major liquidity chains. However, behind the narrative, there were warning signs that few detected in time.
According to The Block, the network's construction faced severe technical delays, a lack of external funding, and strategic disagreements among the teams involved.
The critical point came when it became clear that Converge Chain had neither the minimum infrastructure nor the technical consensus to go into production, a devastating fact considering that Terminal Finance depended entirely on the success of this network.
The DEX team announced that the only responsible option was to abandon the launch, as operating on an improvised infrastructure would entail unacceptable risks to user funds. The cancellation dealt a severe blow to the project's reputation and put pressure on Ethena, which in recent months had been celebrated for its growth and its role within the synthetic stablecoin market like USDe.
The DeFi ecosystem is not immune to execution failures, and many of its projects rely on experimental architectures that depend on extremely fragile factors.
Converge Chain promised performance and sovereignty, but ended up being a reminder that building a blockchain from scratch is a titanic challenge, even for experienced teams. Terminal Finance suffered the same fate, taking with it months of development, expectations, and publicly announced partnerships that are now on hold.
Many investors had bet that the Ethena + Converge + Terminal combination would be one of the most significant structural moves of 2026, but today the landscape has changed. Ethena will have to rethink its strategy, developers will look for alternatives, and the industry will have to learn from this setback, which exposed flaws in planning, communication, and a critical dependence on untested infrastructure.

Topic Opinion:
When a project depends entirely on the existence of a blockchain that doesn't yet exist, the margins for failure become enormous. This case demonstrates that execution is more important than sounding and that without a solid infrastructure, no product will survive, no matter how brilliant the idea. Even so, I believe these setbacks allow the industry to mature and force teams to prioritize fundamentals over hype.
💬 What do you think of this collapse?

Leave your comment...
#defi #ethena #ENA #CryptoNews #blockchain $ENA

📅 November 29 | New York, USA
While Bitcoin has fluctuated between declines, regulatory pressures, and episodes of fragile liquidity, gold has unexpectedly regained prominence and become the preferred asset for preserving capital in 2025.

📖Global liquidity has contracted more than expected due to the aggressive stance of central banks and a still-strong dollar, which has pushed institutional managers to prioritize low-risk, high-capital-absorption assets.
In this environment, gold offers a structural advantage that Bitcoin has failed to replicate: a deep, stable market with a physical supply that inspires immediate confidence during periods of volatility. As interest rate pressure persisted and emerging markets experienced capital outflows, the flow naturally migrated to traditional assets like gold, which historically act as a buffer during times of shock.
The dynamic intensified when the market began to interpret Bitcoin not as a safe haven but as a high beta asset, meaning more sensitive to macro conditions and more prone to forced selling when liquidity contracts.
According to CoinDesk, large funds have reduced their exposure to crypto not due to a lack of interest, but rather the need to increase cash reserves and protect themselves against a potential economic slowdown in 2026. In contrast, gold has been boosted by institutional buyers who value its stability, its low correlation with the technology cycle, and its ability to act as an international reserve when markets lose their way.
Another key factor has been the growing distrust in crypto infrastructures following massive hacks, operational failures of platforms, and the regulatory uncertainty that continues to plague the United States and Europe.
Bitcoin has seen its perception as a safe-haven asset deteriorate in the short term due to these tensions, while gold has maintained its reputation intact. By 2025, it has become clear that for large fund managers, gold represents "proven security," while Bitcoin is seen as "volatile innovation"—a difference that has significantly influenced portfolio rotation.
Finally, the inflationary narrative that previously favored Bitcoin has faded in a context where inflation is under control but systemic risk remains high.
This creates a hybrid scenario where investors are not seeking to multiply returns but rather to protect their balance sheets. In the words of several analysts, Bitcoin will regain prominence when global liquidity expands again, but in 2025 the market favors assets with proven stability and less sensitivity to regulatory shocks.
At this moment, the divergence between gold and Bitcoin not only reflects prices but also global nervousness.
Gold is winning because it represents the known, the physical, and the historically reliable, while Bitcoin is suffering because the market has become extremely conservative after a turbulent year. The crucial question is how long this relationship can last before reversing.

Topic Opinion:
I believe this temporary race between gold and Bitcoin is more a reflection of fear than conviction. The metal wins because the market is paralyzed by volatility, not because Bitcoin has lost its fundamental proposition. When global liquidity returns, the discussion will reverse, but until then, gold will remain the favorite psychological safe haven.
💬What do you think?

Leave your comment...
#bitcoin #GOLD #BTC #crypto2025 #CryptoNews $BTC

📅 November 29 | New York, USA
After weeks of bearish pressure, massive sell-offs, and fear on all fronts, the Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs have just achieved what seemed impossible: their first week with positive net inflows since October.

📖Just over a month ago, spot ETFs—both Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH)—suffered consecutive weeks of record-breaking net outflows. October was particularly brutal, with constant withdrawals driven by macroeconomic fears, regulatory tensions, and a temporary collapse in global liquidity.
The pressure intensified as several major institutions reduced their risk exposure, accelerating a bearish cycle that threatened to extend through the end of the year.
However, according to The Block, something changed this week. For the first time since October, spot ETFs recorded positive net inflows, a sign that took even the most optimistic analysts by surprise. The figures show a moderate but steady return of institutional capital, especially into Bitcoin products.
Among the issuers that stood out were BlackRock, Fidelity and Bitwise, whose vehicles registered inflows that offset the recent abrupt outflows of the month. In the case of Ethereum, the movements were more subtle, but it still managed to close the week in positive territory.
Experts attribute this turnaround to several key factors. First, the market appears to have reached a point of saturation in the selling, creating favorable conditions for a technical rebound.
Furthermore, certain macroeconomic indicators, such as a temporary reduction in dollar volatility and renewed expectations of interest rate cuts by 2026, have restored some confidence to institutional investors. Another relevant element is that spot ETFs remain, for many traditional players, the safest and most regulated way to gain exposure to digital assets during times of uncertainty.
From a technical perspective, the rebound also coincides with signs of absorption by large buyers, suggesting that institutions with long-term strategies took advantage of the dip to accumulate.
Bitcoin, in particular, showed more resilient behavior, with its ETF volume increasing while the spot market remained relatively stable. Ethereum, meanwhile, is beginning to recover the interest lost since the last pullback, although it continues to face resistance due to a lack of regulatory clarity and its relationship with derivatives.
This return of positive inflows doesn't guarantee a change in the cycle yet, but it does alter the prevailing narrative. After several weeks where bearish pressure seemed to crush any attempt at a rebound, this new data has restored some hope to the market.
The next two weeks will be crucial: if the flows continue, we could see an unexpectedly strong end to the year for BTC and ETH. If they slow down, it could simply be a momentary pause before further declines.

Topic Opinion:
I believe this week marks a crucial psychological turning point: it demonstrates that, even in periods of extreme fear, smart capital seizes opportunities. However, I am also aware that a single data point does not change an entire trend; The sustainability of these entries will be key.
💬 Do you think these entries will mark the return of an upward trend?

Leave your comment...
#BitcoinETF #EthereumETF #BTC #ETH #CryptoNews $BTC

📅 November 28 | Seoul, South Korea
The crypto ecosystem is shaking strongly again. Upbit, one of the largest and highest volume exchanges in all of Asia, confirmed after an emergency audit that the recent $30 million hack revealed a much more dangerous flaw than previously thought: a technical error within its infrastructure that may have inadvertently exposed private keys.

📖Upbit confirmed that a malicious actor had managed to drain approximately $30 million in assets after breaching a specific set of hot wallets. The company publicly assured that losses would be fully covered and that its operating infrastructure remained stable, but internal investigators insisted that something was not right.
The attack pattern did not match common phishing techniques or direct system compromises, which led to the activation of an emergency technical audit executed by multiple firms specialized in cybersecurity and on-chain analysis.
According to The Block, it was that audit that uncovered the most alarming point: an internal flaw in the key rotation system that, under certain extremely specific circumstances, could have leaked sensitive elements of the private key generation and storage process.
Although there is no evidence that the attackers have fully exploited this flaw, the mere possibility completely redefines the severity of the incident. The audit describes the flaw as “potentially critical” and “highly dangerous” if combined with unauthorized access or internal compromises.
The researchers also concluded that the bug was present for a limited period, but long enough for a sophisticated attacker to detect anomalies within the signature stream. The $30 million exploit could have just been a side effect of a much deeper vulnerability.
Furthermore, it warns that this flaw, if not discovered in time, could have allowed access to multiple institutional and user wallets, which would have caused multimillion-dollar losses that were impossible to cover. This discovery set off all the alarms within the exchange and it is now in the process of total repair.
Upbit reported that it has already isolated all affected systems, activated a complete key regeneration protocol, redesigned internal custody processes and is working with Korean authorities to document every detail of the attack.
It was also announced that a full technical report will be published in the coming days so that the community, third-party auditors, and other exchanges can assess the vulnerability and harden their own systems. The priority now is to avoid any residual risk and restore market confidence at an especially sensitive time, considering the increase in hacks in Asia in recent months.
Users, analysts and cybersecurity experts agree that this incident sets a disturbing precedent: if an exchange as large as Upbit had a flaw capable of compromising private keys, how many systems could still be exposed without knowing it?

Topic Opinion:
I think the fact that an exchange the size of Upbit faced a vulnerability of this caliber shows how critical it is to strengthen custody systems even on high-end platforms. While Upbit acted quickly and responsibly, the industry as a whole must take this case as a precedent that calls for greater transparency, constant audits, and much stricter standards.
💬 Do you think this incident will forever change the perception of security in exchanges?

Leave your comment...
#Upbit #cryptohacks #CryptoSecurity #CyberSecurity #CryptoNews $ETH

📅 November 28 | Hong Kong, China
The crypto world has just received news that could redefine the future of the digital economy. Animoca Brands, the giant behind hundreds of web3 projects, confirmed that it is preparing the launch of its own stablecoin and that it will fully enter the real world asset (RWA) market starting in 2026.

📖Animoca Brands not only invested in more than 400 startups in the web3 ecosystem, but also developed its own platforms, identity systems and interoperable metaverses. With the initial hype of the metaverse falling, the company changed its strategy: instead of relying solely on games and NFTs, it began to integrate deeply into blockchain financial infrastructure.
Entering the RWA sector, according to The Block, is a natural step to leverage its user base, global licenses and strategic position in Asia. Animoca Brands is building a fully backed stablecoin, designed to integrate with its growing ecosystem of gaming, digital payments, and tokenized asset markets.
The interesting thing is that this stablecoin will not just be a token for transactions, but a fundamental piece of its new financial framework, which will include tokenized properties, real income from the physical world, commercial rights and investment assets linked to global infrastructures. In other words, a direct and enormous bridge between the digital economy and the traditional economy.
The company is working on regulatory compliance with several countries simultaneously, anticipating demand and international expansion. Animoca Brands also confirmed that its stablecoin will be compatible with various chains, especially those optimized for payments and RWA, while its new tokenized products will be available to corporate users, institutional investors and gaming communities.
Company executives announced that 2026 will be “the year of total convergence between gaming, digital property and real-world assets,” which is generating explosive expectations.
Analysts consider that this move could alter the relationship between traditional stablecoins - such as USDT or USDC - and new hybrid models backed by real assets, especially if Animoca Brands manages to integrate millions of users from its video game ecosystem. Other observers warn that handling regulated assets on this scale entails operational, legal and reputational risks, and that the company will need a seamless infrastructure to comply with global audits, transparency and custody standards.
Still, the prevailing sentiment is that Animoca Brands is entering a whole new phase, where it could compete not only with crypto companies, but with traditional financial institutions.

Topic Opinion:
I believe that the combination of stablecoins, gaming and RWA is an extremely powerful strategy, because it unites billions of dollars in real economic activity with hyperactive digital communities. However, I also recognize that Animoca Brands will have to demonstrate an unprecedented level of transparency and governance to make this project work.
💬 Do you think it will be able to compete with giants like Circle or Tether?

Leave your comment...
#AnimocaBrands #RWA #Stablecoins #CryptoNews #Web3 $USDC

📅 November 28 | London, United Kingdom
Balancer, one of the oldest and most emblematic protocols in decentralized finance, finally announced how it will distribute the recovered funds after the exploit that hit the platform months ago and left thousands of users with million-dollar losses.

📖An exploit that drained funds from several vulnerable pools due to a combination of contract failures and sophisticated price manipulation attacks. The hit left an immediate financial void and affected users of varying sizes, from small liquidity providers to whales with millions locked up.
Balancer assured that it would work to recover as much as possible and coordinate with security firms and response teams to track the movements of the stolen funds. Weeks later, a significant portion was finally recovered thanks to multilateral efforts that involved on-chain analysts and direct negotiations with entities linked to the attack.
On that basis, the most recent announcement was the most anticipated: Balancer confirmed that it will distribute the recovered funds according to a proportional scheme based on verified losses. According to The Block, the process will take into account each user's exact exposure to the committed pools and the distribution will be made in ETH, USDC and other tokens depending on the affected asset.
A crucial detail is that only verifiable and recovered funds will be distributed, not compensation for the full value lost, meaning some users will receive less than they expected. The protocol clarified that this is the only realistic way to end the case.
The plan also includes additional public audits to validate the calculation of amounts, as well as the publication of a detailed report that allows users to manually verify their data. The team emphasized that this transparency is key to restoring trust after the attack. The distribution will begin in phases: first to the most affected liquidity providers, then to the rest, with a claim window for any discrepancies.
Despite the controversy, the reality is that this announcement puts an end to one of the most tense chapters of the protocol and defines a precedent for how mature projects should handle security crises.

Topic Opinion:
I think partial recovery is already a huge achievement considering the complexity of modern exploits. However, I also think that larger protocols should start implementing permanent emergency funds that protect users in extreme events.
💬 What do you think of Balancer's plan

Leave your comment...
#balancer #defi #exploit #BlockchainSecurity #CryptoNews $BAL

📅 November 28 | Zug, Switzerland
Bitmine, known for being the largest corporate treasury of Ethereum in the world, executed an unexpected purchase of $44 million in ETH, right in the middle of one of the market's most volatile weeks.

📖Ethereum began to show clear signs of weakness, pushing its price below key levels. While analysts feared a prolongation of the bearish cycle, Bitmine began unusual activities in its treasury.
During the last few months, the company had already invested more than $200 million additional in ETH, consolidating itself as the largest institutional buyer in the ecosystem. However, the recent purchase of $44 million marks a turning point, as it coincides with a period where selling pressure from exchanges, funds and large holders has pushed global sentiment towards extreme pessimism.
The sequence that led to this acquisition has several key components. First, Bitmine has been strengthening its position in Ethereum since late 2024, when the DeFi ecosystem began to regain traction after the US regulatory shock.
According to verified figures, the company currently controls one of the largest treasuries in the sector, managing positions exceeding $1.5 billion in digital assets. The market assumed that after the latest declines, Bitmine would pause its aggressive strategy, but the company did exactly the opposite.
The purchase was executed through several institutional addresses connected to Bitmine Labs, suggesting a detailed and premeditated plan. The trade is estimated to have occurred while Ethereum was struggling to maintain key psychological levels, reinforcing the narrative that Bitmine is betting on a structural ecosystem rebound.
Additionally, internal sources indicate that the company views the current reduction in liquidity as a historic opportunity, especially considering recent advances in scalability, institutional adoption and the continued reduction of liquid supply on exchanges.
The market remains divided. Some analysts claim that this purchase could send a bullish signal and help stabilize the price. Others believe that, on the contrary, it could be a dangerous play if the market does not find a bottom soon.

Topic Opinion:
I think companies with a long-term vision are identifying opportunities that most retail investors can't see in the midst of fear. However, I am also aware that these moves may intensify pressure on an already fragile market.
💬 What do you think of Bitmine's aggressive strategy?

Leave your comment...
#Ethereum #Bitmine #CryptoNews #ETH #CryptoNewss $ETH

📅 November 27 | New York, USA
The prediction market landscape has just shifted dramatically. Kalshi, one of the industry's leading platforms, has doubled its valuation in a matter of weeks, sparking a wave of fierce speculation about the future of the prediction space in the United States.

📖According to The Block, institutional investors who previously viewed prediction markets with caution now see immense potential in regulated platforms capable of rapid scalability. And Kalshi, thanks to its status approved by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), has become the preferred choice for those betting on a future where predictive markets are as common as traditional financial derivatives.
But the real turning point emerges when analyzing the company's current strategy. In a context where interest in betting on political, macroeconomic, and social events is reaching historic levels, Kalshi and Polymarket are emerging as the two titans capable of dominating the space.
The creation of a prediction duopoly, with Kalshi representing the highly regulated side and Polymarket the crypto-native alternative with greater operational freedom. Two completely different visions, but destined to clash head-on.
Kalshi's growth is also fueled by an explosion in trading volumes, as new retail and professional traders migrate to the platform seeking direct exposure to real-world events, from elections to economic indicators. The company is moving at an aggressive pace, launching new markets and expanding its infrastructure to absorb the growing demand.
However, the race is not without risks. Some experts point out that rapid growth could put Kalshi in the crosshairs of stricter regulators if volumes exceed certain thresholds.
Furthermore, attempting to consolidate a duopoly in such a young market could generate aggressive competition, lawsuits, or regulatory friction. Even so, Kalshi is experiencing its strongest moment and shows no signs of slowing down.

Topic Opinion:
I think Kalshi's bet to consolidate itself as one of the two giants of the prediction market is risky, but also incredibly strategic. The sector is growing at a speed few imagined, and the tensions between regulation and crypto freedom are creating an explosive narrative.
💬 Do you think Kalshi will be able to consolidate this duopoly with Polymarket?

Leave your comment...
#Kalshi #Polymarket #PredictionMarkets #CryptoNews #BTC $BTC

📅 November 27 | Sydney, Australia
The crypto ecosystem is once again shaking thanks to Kain Warwick, the renowned founder of Synthetix, who is leading one of the most ambitious expansions of the year with his Infinex platform. After closing an impressive $67.7 million funding round through the sale of Patron NFTs, the company is preparing for the next major milestone: the Sonar Sale, a key event that will serve as a prelude to the highly anticipated INXS TGE scheduled for 2026.

📖The progress of Infinex is attracting global attention. According to The Block, the company strengthened its position after completing a $67.7 million funding round with its Patron NFTs, an unconventional strategy for raising capital at scale. These NFTs, more than just collectible assets, represent a symbolic form of “sponsorship” within the ecosystem, associating holders with the project's expansion and granting them benefits aligned with its evolution.

📅 November 27 | Canberra, Australia
The Australian government has just taken one of the most aggressive and decisive regulatory steps of the year: the official proposal for a mandatory licensing regime for all crypto platforms operating in the country.

📖The regulatory proposal presented by the Australian Treasury establishes a profound change in how crypto platforms will operate in the country. According to The Block, the government wants to implement a compulsory licensing system, which would require all companies in the sector to register under a framework similar to that of traditional financial service providers.
This includes requirements regarding minimum capital, audits, risk management, custody security, periodic reporting, and strict protocols against money laundering and illicit activities. The official document suggests that exchanges will have to demonstrate not only technical solvency, but also administrative robustness and the capacity to protect consumers.
For the authorities, this new system is the response to a series of global incidents that exposed serious vulnerabilities: bankruptcies, multimillion-dollar hacks, losses due to mismanagement, and irresponsible practices. Australia doesn't want to repeat episodes like FTX or be embroiled in scandals that affect thousands of citizens.
Some local companies see the framework as an opportunity to legitimize the industry and attract institutional investment. However, others warn that the requirements are so demanding that they could exclude mid-sized platforms and startups that lack the necessary capital or structure to comply. The fear is that this regulation will further concentrate the market in the hands of a few global giants.
The Treasury also proposed a transition period so that companies can adapt before the regime comes into full effect, but there is no guarantee that everyone will survive that process.
Experts say that this regulation could turn Australia into a “global model” if applied in a balanced way, but also into a “minefield” if it ends up stifling innovation. For now, the debate is open, and the industry is preparing for an intense period of changes, challenges, and negotiations.

Topic Opinion:
Regulation is inevitable, and if designed well, it can strengthen the ecosystem and protect users. But I must also say that these rules, when too rigid, can stifle innovation before it even has a chance to flourish.
💬 Do you think compulsory licensing will help professionalize the crypto market?

Leave your comment...
#AustraliaCrypto #CryptoNewss #BTC #CryptoNews #BlockchainRegulation $BTC

📅 November 27 | Seoul, South Korea
An unexpected storm hits the heart of the Asian crypto market. Upbit, South Korea's largest exchange and a global pillar of digital commerce, suffered a massive hack that drained $37 million in a matter of minutes and unleashed chaos among users and institutions.

📖Upbit, operated by Dunamu, detected anomalous activity in one of its hot wallets when several million Ether (ETH) began to be transferred in rapid, consecutive transactions to a newly created wallet. All of this occurred within a tiny timeframe, leaving the technical team unable to react immediately.
According to The Block, the hackers executed the operation with surgical precision: they drained the funds, redistributed them to various addresses, and began fragmenting them almost in real time to hinder their traceability on the blockchain.
In response, Upbit activated its emergency protocol, froze deposits and withdrawals, and moved most of its assets to cold wallets while alerting its international partners. At the same time, South Korean authorities requested preliminary information, aware that an incident of this scale could have regulatory and security repercussions throughout the country.
The collective memory of the ecosystem resurrected the specter of the 2019 hack, when Upbit lost $49 million in ETH. Despite the improvements announced at the time, this new attack reopens serious doubts about the true robustness of its infrastructure and the exchange's preparedness to face sophisticated threats.
Analysts maintain that, although the stolen amount represents only a fraction of the funds in custody, the reputational damage could be much more severe and lasting. For now, the funds are still being traced, but the likelihood of full recovery is uncertain.

Topic Opinion:
Absolute security in centralized exchanges does not exist. Upbit is a giant, with immense resources and constant audits, and yet it was compromised again. This case underscores the urgent need to strengthen infrastructure, increase transparency, and rethink the level of exposure of hot wallets.
💬 What do you think of this new hack?

Leave your comment...
#Upbit #Hack #CryptoSecurity #blockchain #CryptoNews $ETH

📅 November 26 | Singapore
Crypto giant DWF Labs is once again shaking up the ecosystem, this time by announcing something that could redefine the future of decentralized finance: a DeFi institutional fund designed to attract banks, traditional funds, and asset managers to the heart of the on-chain world.

📖According to The Block, DWF Labs will launch a DeFi investment fund specifically targeting institutional investors. The goal: to channel high-level capital into infrastructure protocols, liquidity, derivatives, and key tools of the on-chain economy.
The move comes at a delicate time. Despite recent volatility cycles, the DeFi sector has reached a level of technological maturity that is attracting the attention of traditional players who—until recently—considered it too risky or “experimental.”
According to Andrei Grachev, co-founder of DWF Labs, we are entering the third phase of crypto evolution, characterized by the participation of institutions seeking serious exposure, sustainable returns, and clearer risk structures. The firm states that the new fund is designed to facilitate this massive influx: from custody services and external audits to underwriting models and regulatory processes compatible with major players.
However, the announcement is not without controversy. DWF Labs has been repeatedly criticized for its hyperactive role in markets, its participation in rapid investment rounds, and its ability to influence the liquidity of emerging tokens. Although the firm denies all accusations, several analysts point out that institutional entry could be a double-edged sword:
More capital, but also more concentration.More political pressure, and potentially less real decentralization.
The DWF Labs fund will focus on protocols it considers “next-generation pillars”: on-chain derivatives, interoperability infrastructures, new architecture L2 solutions, and algorithmic credit markets that seek to replace traditional loans.

Topic Opinion:
A real financial infrastructure, capable of competing with traditional systems. But institutional investment, while necessary for scaling, also demands vigilance, transparency, and a staunch defense of decentralization, which is the lifeblood of the ecosystem.
💬 Do you think institutional investment will boost DeFi…?

Leave your comment…
#DWF #defi #InstitutionalCrypto #CryptoNews #Web3 $BTC

📅 November 26 | New York, USA
A corporate earthquake has hit World Liberty, one of the fastest-growing groups in the crypto-finance ecosystem in recent years. What seemed like a solid, modern, and expanding conglomerate now faces internal investigations, abrupt layoffs, and the reputational impact of a money laundering conviction in Rwanda involving one of its former executives.

📖According to The Block, World Liberty—a firm that manages investments and treasuries linked to the crypto sector—is facing an internal collapse of trust. The company initiated internal investigations, forced reorganizations, and layoffs that affected even high-level employees.
Tensions exploded after one of its former executives was convicted of money laundering in Rwanda, involved in a scheme that allegedly funneled funds through a complex financial network. Although World Liberty asserted that this individual was no longer with the company, the reputational damage was immediate.
Internal reports indicate an atmosphere of turmoil, chaos, and disarray within the organization:
Teams clashing over financial decisions.Disputes over the management of crypto treasuries.Doubts about internal controls and governance.A leadership that, according to current and former employees, is “losing control.”
One of the most critical issues is the handling of the crypto-treasury, a key and sensitive department. Several employees reported questionable decisions, a lack of communication, and tensions arising from alleged fund movements that were not properly documented. This led to part of the team being separated from the company, while internal investigators review recent transactions.
The report also mentions that the atmosphere became so toxic that some employees decided to resign voluntarily, noting that the company had gone from meteoric growth to an environment of corporate paranoia where everyone suspected everyone else.
Although World Liberty is trying to project an image of stability, sources indicate that the chaos is far from over. And with authorities in several countries now interested in reviewing financial connections, the company could face months—or years—of scrutiny.

Topic Opinion:
A lack of controls, the pressure to expand, and the temptation to push the boundaries can ultimately derail even enormous organizations. I wouldn't be surprised if this case uncovers even deeper problems and that other firms in the sector are going through similar storms.
💬 Do you think we're facing another "FTX moment," or just an internal crisis that will soon blow over?

Leave your comment...
#WorldLiberty #CryptoTreasury #WLFI #MoneyLaundering #CryptoNews $WLFI

📅 November 26 | New York, USA
Against all odds, and defying years of ridicule, extreme volatility, and doubts about its usefulness, Bitwise Asset Management has just launched the first Dogecoin (DOGE) ETF on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).

📖According to The Block, Bitwise officially launched the Bitwise Dogecoin ETF (ticker: $DOGE ) on the NYSE, marking a historic moment for the crypto industry. This ETF is one of the first to take a memecoin and turn it into a regulated financial vehicle accessible to both traditional and institutional investors.
The Bitwise team acknowledged that this launch “was not easy.” The company had to defend the surprisingly persistent relevance of Dogecoin, even after cycles in which the market assumed that DOGE would lose traction to more tech-oriented or utilitarian competitors. But the data showed otherwise: Dogecoin remained among the most traded assets, with a massive community and liquidity levels that surpass even serious Layer 1 projects.
Bitwise assured that the ETF is backed by real DOGE, held in custody on institutional infrastructure, with no derivatives or synthetic exposure. The product is designed to offer investors a safe and regulated way to participate in the Dogecoin phenomenon, without the need to manage wallets or crypto platforms.
Despite its humorous origins, Dogecoin has demonstrated resilience, broad global distribution, and a level of adoption that few memecoins have managed to sustain for more than a decade. Even its occasional endorsement from figures like Elon Musk continued to fuel cycles of visibility.
The launch occurred “against the odds”: many analysts didn't believe that regulators or the NYSE would consider listing a memecoin ETF. However, Bitwise argued that DOGE has become a cultural asset, liquid and with a longer track record than most current tokens. This ETF could also open the door to a new category: memecoin ETFs, a line that previously seemed unthinkable.

Topic Opinion:
DOGE's listing on the NYSE is a powerful sign that the narrative has changed and that digital culture also has financial value. But be warned: it remains a highly volatile and emotional asset, and turning it into an ETF doesn't make it any less risky.
💬 Do you think we'll see a Shiba Inu or PEPE ETF after this?
Leave your comment...

#DOGECOİN #Bitwise #etf #NYSE #CryptoNews $DOGE

📅 November 26 | United States
In a move that took the entire crypto industry by surprise, Grayscale—the digital fund giant—has just filed a formal application with the SEC to launch the first-ever Zcash (ZEC) ETF.

📖Grayscale Investments officially filed with the SEC to list the “Grayscale Zcash Trust ETF”, a vehicle that would transform its current ZEC private trust into a regulated, publicly traded ETF. The move follows the same model the company used to transform the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) into an approved spot ETF in early 2024.
Zcash, launched in 2016, has distinguished itself as one of the most sophisticated privacy projects thanks to its use of zk-SNARKs, a cryptographic technology that allows for verifiable transactions without revealing sensitive information. However, this same privacy has generated concern among regulators and financial watchdogs, leading many exchanges to delist ZEC in various jurisdictions.
Grayscale's filing is therefore a bold move. The document sent to the SEC suggests that the company believes ZEC has sufficient technological and market value to justify a regulated institutional product. The ETF would not generate synthetic exposure or derivatives: as with its main products, it would be backed by actual holdings of the underlying asset.
According to The Block, there is still no clear timeline for approval. The SEC could delay, request clarifications, or reject the application, especially given that Zcash continues to be the focus of concerns related to compliance, anonymity, and traceability. But the fact that a company like Grayscale has decided to take this step indicates significant confidence that the regulatory climate may be becoming more flexible.
Analysts point out that, if approved, this ETF would set a major precedent. It could open the door to financial products based on other “privacy coins” such as Monero (XMR) or Firo (FIRO), although these face even greater regulatory challenges.

Topic Opinion:
Bringing a privacy coin into the ETF world is crossing a frontier that few have dared to touch. If the SEC approves the application, Zcash could experience a monumental rebirth; if it rejects it, it will be clear that the regulated ecosystem is not yet ready to fully embrace financial privacy.
💬 Do you think the SEC will approve the first privacy coin ETF?

Leave your comment...
#zcash #Grayscale #etf #SEC #CryptoNews $ZEC