TechNews

Despite strict U.S. restrictions, Chinese companies managed to acquire advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment worth nearly $40 billion. The discovery exposed a major flaw in America’s export control policy and showed that China’s technological rise continues largely unhindered — thanks to legislative loopholes and poor coordination among U.S. allies.

Investigation exposes systemic failure
An inquiry by the U.S. Congressional Committee on China revealed that Washington’s export bans are not working as intended. While U.S. companies must comply with strict rules, Japanese and Dutch firms such as ASML and Tokyo Electron have continued selling similar equipment to Chinese buyers.
In short — Washington banned it, Tokyo and Amsterdam sold it.
The report found that Chinese chipmakers spent $38 billion on manufacturing tools last year, a 66% increase from 2022, precisely when U.S. restrictions went into effect. Those purchases represented nearly 40% of total global sales for the five largest semiconductor equipment makers — Applied Materials, Lam Research, KLA, ASML, and Tokyo Electron.

A national security warning
According to the committee, this situation has boosted China’s semiconductor capabilities, with “deep implications for human rights and democratic values worldwide.” Advanced chips power everything from AI systems to military technology, directly influencing the balance of power between the United States and China.
“U.S. rules fail when allies don’t follow the same line,” one committee member said. “China can continue developing technologies that were supposed to be out of reach.”

Huawei and a shadow network
Investigators paid special attention to three Chinese companies — SwaySure Technology, Shenzhen Pengxinxu Technology, and SiEn (Qingdao) Integrated Circuits. These firms became key buyers of chip-making equipment and, according to U.S. lawmakers, have ties to a covert network supporting Huawei Technologies.
As a result, the U.S. Department of Commerce banned all exports to these companies in December.

Japan and the Netherlands — the enablers of China’s success
While the U.S. blocked specific products and firms, European and Asian allies were far more lenient. Japanese and Dutch suppliers, the report said, kept selling advanced tools to China, effectively undermining Washington’s efforts to contain Beijing’s technological rise.
Mark Dougherty, head of Tokyo Electron’s U.S. subsidiary, admitted that sales to China have recently slowed due to closer coordination with Washington, but also conceded that the U.S. is still far from its goal.

Calls for unified global action
Lawmakers are now pushing for broader, nationwide restrictions — not just on individual Chinese companies, but against China as a whole. The committee is calling for tighter cooperation among allies and even bans on components that China could use to develop its own semiconductor tools.
For now, it’s clear that America’s “tech containment” strategy is full of cracks. Allies play by their own rules — and China knows exactly how to exploit that.

Summary: allies play different games
Both Democratic and Republican administrations have tried for years to limit China’s access to chip-making technology. But without a unified international approach, loopholes will continue to allow Chinese firms to buy what they’re supposedly forbidden from obtaining.
Forty billion dollars later, it’s clear that Beijing is winning the technological chess match — while Washington keeps rearranging its pieces.

#china , #Technology , #technews , #AI , #Geopolitics

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

xAI, the artificial intelligence company founded by Elon Musk, is entering a new phase of rapid growth. According to the Financial Times, Musk has appointed Anthony Armstrong, a former investment banker at Morgan Stanley, as the company’s new Chief Financial Officer (CFO).

Strategic Leadership Boost Amid Rapid Expansion
The appointment comes at a crucial time as xAI experiences accelerated development and positions itself in an increasingly competitive AI landscape. Armstrong is expected to bring financial stability, capital management expertise, and global market experience from his years at Morgan Stanley.
This move underscores Musk’s intent to elevate xAI to the ranks of global AI powerhouses such as OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind.

xAI’s Vision: From Social Networks to “Understanding the Universe”
Founded with the mission to “understand the universe through artificial intelligence,” xAI has quickly become one of Musk’s most ambitious ventures.

In March 2025, Musk merged xAI with his social platform X (formerly Twitter), creating a unified ecosystem where social data, computing infrastructure, and neural models work together to advance the company’s goals.
The integration with X has enabled xAI to train AI models more efficiently, expand its data center capacity, and accelerate the development of new products such as Grokipedia — an interactive next-generation encyclopedia introduced by Musk in September.

Musk described Grokipedia as “a major improvement over existing online encyclopedias” and a key step toward building AI capable of genuine understanding.

Armstrong to Oversee Finance and Strategic Growth
As CFO, Anthony Armstrong will be responsible for financial oversight, managing capital investments, and guiding strategic acquisitions that will support xAI’s rapid expansion.

He will also work closely with leadership at the X platform to ensure financial synergy between Musk’s AI and social media businesses.
Analysts say the move highlights Musk’s ambition to transform xAI into a full-scale global tech powerhouse, aiming not only to compete with OpenAI but to pioneer next-generation “conscious” artificial intelligence.

What’s Next: Expansion, Acquisitions, and AI Dominance
Following a wave of investments into high-performance computing centers and the recruitment of top AI researchers from Google DeepMind, Microsoft, and OpenAI, xAI is preparing for another round of acquisitions.

Armstrong’s appointment comes at the perfect time, as he will be tasked with strengthening the financial backbone of what is becoming a central pillar of Musk’s empire, alongside Tesla, SpaceX, and Starlink.
Sources close to the company say xAI is expected to announce new partnerships with major cloud providers and expand infrastructure for training its next-generation AI models, Grok 4 and Grok 5, in the coming months.

#ElonMusk , #XAI , #AI , #Grok , #technews

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Europe is facing a critical vulnerability — an overreliance on Elon Musk’s SpaceX. Bernard Liautaud, managing partner at Balderton Capital, has warned that unless the continent accelerates investment in its own space and defense technologies, it risks becoming a hostage to American dominance in orbit.
“An increasing part of military supremacy will take place in space — and Europe is falling behind,” Liautaud told Financial Times. “We must become self-sufficient. Dependence on SpaceX is a massive risk.”

Europe Losing Ground in the Space Race
Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, NATO countries have sharply increased defense spending and demand for cutting-edge technology. Dozens of startups have emerged in fields like drones, AI, and battlefield software. Yet in space — the new geopolitical frontier — Europe remains vulnerable.
SpaceX dominates the global satellite launch market, and its Starlink system is a key component of military communications. For European governments, SpaceX is both a critical partner and a potential liability — particularly if political relations with Washington were to deteriorate.

Balderton Pushes for “Space Independence”
Originally founded as the European arm of Benchmark Capital, Balderton Capital is now one of the continent’s largest venture firms. It has backed over 250 tech companies — including Revolut, Wayve, and Dream Games — and is now channeling resources into projects that strengthen Europe’s strategic autonomy.
Last year, the firm co-led a $160 million investment round in The Exploration Company, a Franco-German startup developing cargo spacecraft, lunar landers, and rocket systems. “These are the kinds of investments that can help Europe build an independent space infrastructure,” Liautaud said.

Europe vs. American Dominance
Hélène Huby, CEO of The Exploration Company and former Airbus executive, voiced a similar concern at Italian Tech Week:

“Europe is currently weak when it comes to space infrastructure,” she said. “We need to invest in launch systems, satellites, and technology that can rival SpaceX and Blue Origin.”
SpaceX, now valued at over $400 billion, dominates the world’s commercial launch market. Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin is another major U.S. competitor. Meanwhile, European players face limited funding, fragmented ecosystems, and slower development cycles.

Startups as Europe’s New Defense Backbone
Balderton partner Suranga Chandratillake said the mindset across Europe is changing:

“Twenty-five years ago, governments would have never turned to startups for defense solutions,” he noted. “Today, they are an essential part of the answer.”
European governments are increasingly involving private innovators in defense procurement, marking a fundamental shift in how the region cooperates with the tech sector. This integration could help Europe keep pace with the U.S., China, and India — nations already treating space as a strategic frontier.

Conclusion
Europe has world-class scientists, engineers, and investors — but lacks a unified strategy and strong funding. If it wants to stay sovereign, it must learn to “think like SpaceX” while forging its own path to the stars.

#Europe , #SpaceX , #technews , #Technology , #worldnews

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Tesla has found itself at the center of a heated debate. A group of key shareholders has urged other investors to vote against Elon Musk’s proposed compensation package worth up to $1 trillion at the company’s annual general meeting on November 6. Under the plan, Musk would only receive the payout if Tesla’s market capitalization rises to $8.5 trillion and the company meets a series of ambitious milestones, including producing one million Optimus robots, delivering twelve million electric cars by 2035, and raising annual profits to $400 billion. According to Tesla’s board, the package is designed as a performance-based incentive that directly links Musk’s compensation to shareholder value – if he fails to deliver, he gets nothing.

Investor Criticism and Leadership Disputes
Opposition has come from SOC Investment Group, the American Federation of Teachers, and several U.S. state treasurers. Critics argue that Musk is stretched too thin across multiple companies – from SpaceX and Neuralink to Boring Company and xAI – and that Tesla is not his main focus. They also claim the board lacks independence due to its close personal ties to Musk. Furthermore, they say the performance criteria are vague and less demanding than they appear, warning that approving the package could dilute shareholder equity and weaken oversight of Tesla’s management.

Weak Performance and Future Uncertainty
Tesla has faced significant challenges in the first half of 2025. Revenue dropped 13% year-on-year, vehicle sales fell 18%, operating profit plunged 52%, and net income dropped 38%. In Europe, revenues declined by more than a third, with the steepest falls in Sweden, Belgium, and the Netherlands. Tesla’s market share in battery electric vehicles slipped from 21.6% to 14.5%. Although the company reported 497,099 deliveries in the third quarter — a 7% increase compared to the previous year — production actually fell compared to last year’s figures.

A Crucial Vote Ahead
The upcoming shareholder vote will be decisive not only for Musk but also for Tesla’s future. Approving the compensation package would represent a strong bet on Musk’s leadership and his vision of transforming Tesla into a megacorporation of the future. Rejecting it, on the other hand, could pave the way for greater oversight and potentially more stable long-term strategies. The outcome will reveal whether investors trust Musk enough to back a compensation plan unlike anything ever seen in corporate history.

#ElonMusk , #Tesla , #stockmarket , #INNOVATION , #technews

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Indonesia, the world’s third-largest democracy, has cracked down on TikTok by suspending its registration as an electronic service provider. The move comes after the app failed to fully cooperate in an investigation into its livestreaming feature being misused during recent mass protests.

TikTok Under Fire: Gambling, Protests, and Missing Data
According to Alexander Sabar from the Ministry of Communications, TikTok did not provide all the requested data on livestreams, which were allegedly exploited by accounts linked to online gambling during anti-government demonstrations. ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, only supplied partial information, citing internal procedures.
“TikTok violated its obligations, and therefore we decided to suspend its registration,” Sabar said.
Officially, TikTok now lacks a valid license in Indonesia, though the app remains accessible in the country for the time being. With over 100 million accounts in Indonesia, the question remains whether the government will proceed with a full ban.

The New Trend: Biometric Verification for All?
The TikTok dispute has reignited debate over social media regulation. Indonesian politicians are openly advocating for stricter measures, including mandatory biometric verification of users.
Bambang Haryadi, a member of the ruling Gerindra party, argued that anonymous “buzzers” exploit platforms for fraud and political manipulation. He proposed a “one identity = one account” system.
The Ministry of Communications is now considering requiring face scans or fingerprint checks as a prerequisite for registering social media accounts. Officials claim such measures would increase accountability and reduce fake accounts.

Privacy and Civil Liberties at Risk?
Digital rights advocates, however, are raising alarms. They warn that biometric verification could severely undermine freedom of expression, privacy, and civil liberties in the country. Critics argue this is part of a broader push by Indonesia’s political elite to tighten control over the digital sphere, especially as young Indonesians increasingly use social media for activism and political criticism.

TikTok at a Crossroads
TikTok responded by saying it had temporarily suspended livestreaming during the protests to “maintain a safe and civil environment.” But the Indonesian government is demanding more — full transparency and compliance with local rules.
This case highlights growing tensions between tech giants and governments as regulations tighten worldwide. For Indonesia, the clash with TikTok may only be the beginning of a broader strategy to control the nation’s digital ecosystem.

#tiktok , #Indonesia , #technews , #Privacy , #worldnews

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Nvidia's co-founder and CEO, Jensen Huang, has sold another significant block of the company's stock this week, according to regulatory filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Form 4 filing shows Huang disposed of 225,000 shares between Sept. 30 and Oct. 2, 2025. The transactions were carried out under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan, which allows insiders to sell a predetermined amount of shares at set times and prices to avoid accusations of insider trading.
The plan was adopted on March 20, 2025, and sales were executed at prices ranging from $182 to $191 per sharethroughout the week.
In total, Huang sold shares worth $42 million, but filings show he remains a massive stakeholder with 782 million shares—worth about $147 billion—held indirectly through trusts and investment entities tied to him and his family.

🔸 Follow for tech, business, and market insights

#Nvidia #JensenHuang #StockMarket #TechNews #AIRevolution

Tensions between Elon Musk and OpenAI are flaring once again. The creator of ChatGPT has sharply rejected the latest lawsuit from the xAI CEO, describing it as part of a “long-term harassment campaign” designed to slow the company’s growth and intimidate its staff.

“We won’t be intimidated”
OpenAI issued a statement backed by emails, X posts, court filings, and media commentary, firmly denying Musk’s accusations of trade secret theft. According to the company, this is nothing more than another attempt to create headlines and disrupt their progress:
“We will protect our employees and won’t be intimidated by his attempts to bully them,” the company wrote.
OpenAI also rejected claims that it poached employees or took confidential information from Musk’s AI startup, xAI. The organization argued that Musk’s lawsuit over structural changes—meant to delay OpenAI’s nonprofit-to-for-profit shift—was not rooted in genuine grievances but in media posturing.

Musk once sought control of OpenAI
Court filings reveal that in 2017, Elon Musk attempted to gain majority control of OpenAI, reportedly demanding ownership, board control, and the CEO role. When the company refused, he allegedly withheld promised funding. LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman stepped in to cover salaries and keep operations afloat.
In early 2018, Musk suggested in emails that Tesla could serve as OpenAI’s financial engine to compete with Google’s DeepMind. Yet, he admitted even Tesla’s resources might not be enough:

“Even raising several hundred million won’t be enough. This needs billions per year immediately, or forget it,” Musk wrote at the time.

Hiring practices lawsuit challenged
OpenAI has also filed a motion to dismiss Musk’s claims of “illegal hiring practices.” The company stressed that it lawfully recruits talent from across the tech industry and has no need for xAI’s trade secrets.
“Unable to keep up with our pace of innovation, xAI has filed this baseless trade secret lawsuit,” OpenAI’s defense stated. The company further accused Musk of using litigation as a PR weapon to intimidate staff, labeling his strategy as “lawfare.”

Antitrust claims over Apple partnership
Musk’s startup also raised concerns about OpenAI’s collaboration with Apple, claiming that integrating ChatGPT into certain iPhone features is anticompetitive. OpenAI’s lawyers dismissed the argument, noting that xAI failed to demonstrate any measurable harm that would justify antitrust intervention.

OpenAI surpasses SpaceX in valuation
The courtroom clash comes as OpenAI’s valuation has soared past Musk’s own crown jewel, SpaceX. According to The New York Times, OpenAI completed a secondary share sale that valued the company at $500 billion, making it the world’s most valuable startup.
Roughly $6.6 billion worth of stock changed hands, with investors including Thrive Capital, SoftBank Group, Dragoneer, T. Rowe Price, and Abu Dhabi’s MGX.

The battle for AI dominance
The legal showdown is more than a personal feud between Musk and his former project—it’s a fight for dominance in the AI revolution. While OpenAI cements its position as the most valuable startup on the planet, Musk is scrambling to defend his empire and carve out space for xAI. The outcome could shape who leads the next chapter of artificial intelligence.

#ElonMusk , #AI , #OpenAI , #technews , #INNOVATION

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Saudi Arabia is pushing its gaming ambitions to unprecedented heights with the $55 billion leveraged buyout of Electronic Arts (EA)—the publisher behind blockbuster franchises such as Madden NFL, Battlefield, The Sims, and EA Sports FC. The deal marks a historic milestone in the kingdom’s strategy to diversify its economy away from oil and position itself as a leader in the global gaming industry.

The Largest Leveraged Buyout in History
The transaction is backed by the kingdom’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) alongside Silver Lake Management and Jared Kushner’s Affinity Partners. The consortium agreed to pay $210 per share in cash, a 25% premium compared to EA’s stock price before reports of the negotiations surfaced.
The deal surpasses the previous record set in 2007 with the $48.4 billion buyout of TXU Corp. To finance the acquisition, JPMorgan Chase & Co. committed a staggering $20 billion in debt—the largest leveraged buyout financing ever. PIF is also rolling over its nearly 10% stake in EA, worth roughly $5 billion, and will contribute the majority of the $36 billion in equity financing.
EA’s CEO Andrew Wilson welcomed the decision, calling it “a strong recognition of the creativity of our teams and the iconic experiences they have built for millions of players around the world.”

Building a Gaming Empire
EA’s flagship franchises like Madden NFL and EA Sports FC consistently rank among the industry’s top sellers. The highly anticipated launch of Battlefield 6 on October 10 further strengthened the case for taking the company private.
This deal is just the latest in a series of massive Saudi investments in gaming. PIF has already poured $30 billion into the sector, acquiring stakes in Nintendo, Take-Two Interactive, and Nexon. Through Savvy Games Group, it bought mobile gaming giant Scopely for $4.9 billion in 2023 and invested $3.5 billion in Niantic, the maker of Pokémon Go.
Now, however, the kingdom is shifting from mobile dominance to securing a major foothold in the console and PC markets, which remain the backbone of the $178 billion global gaming industry.

The Crown Prince and Esports Ambitions
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, himself an avid gamer, has been at the forefront of promoting gaming as part of Vision 2030. Earlier this year, he personally closed the Esports World Cup in Riyadh, awarding a record-breaking $70 million prize pool.
Analysts suggest that aligning EA’s sports portfolio with Saudi Arabia’s heavy investment in the Saudi Pro League could unlock new opportunities across gaming and sports broadcasting.

Two Sides Under Pressure
Both parties face financial challenges. EA has been grappling with layoffs, criticism over failed titles and acquisitions, and slowing sales in the post-pandemic market. On the other side, PIF is increasingly reliant on debt markets to fund its diversification efforts, as lower oil prices weigh on Saudi finances.
Nevertheless, this record-shattering acquisition underscores Saudi Arabia’s determination to spend big in its quest to become a global gaming powerhouse.

#SaudiArabia , #GlobalMarkets , #worldnews , #INNOVATION , #technews

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Elon Musk has once again shaken the tech world – this time by announcing Grokipedia, a new knowledge database he claims will be a “massive upgrade over Wikipedia.”
The project will be built under his company xAI, which Musk describes as a crucial step toward its ultimate mission: understanding the universe. His Grok chatbot is already being equipped with tools that can automatically detect errors in online content and rewrite them more accurately. These “synthetic corrections,” Musk argues, could serve as the foundation for an alternative to Wikipedia, free from inaccuracies and ideological bias.

Criticism of Wikipedia and David Sacks’ Role
Musk’s comments came in response to entrepreneur David Sacks, who argued that Wikipedia is “hopelessly biased” and run by “an army of left-wing activists.” He highlighted the issue of Wikipedia ranking at the top of Google search results and becoming a training source for AI models – all while ignoring certain outlets.
Sacks pointed to Wikipedia’s blacklist of media sources, which includes Breitbart, Daily Caller, The Epoch Times, and Fox News, while approving sources like The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, and The Nation.

AI as a Crowdsourcing Alternative
The question remains whether artificial intelligence can truly handle the challenge that Wikipedia solves through thousands of human editors. A 2024 study found that AI performs well on simple fact-based queries but struggles with complex “why” or “how” questions. It also frequently provides inaccurate references.

Musk vs. Wikipedia: A Longstanding Feud
Musk’s feud with Wikipedia is not new. In 2022, he accused the platform of bias during disputes over the definition of a recession. A year later, he clashed with Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales, and in 2024 even offered $1 billion if Wikipedia would rename itself “Dickipedia.”
He further stirred controversy by urging people to stop donating to Wikipedia, after reports surfaced that the Wikimedia Foundation spends millions annually on diversity and inclusion projects. Musk has repeatedly labeled it “Wokepedia.”

Grokipedia as “Wikipedia 2.0”?
If Grokipedia comes to life, it would represent one of the most direct challenges ever to the traditional Wikipedia. Musk envisions an alternative database that is more reliable, less biased, and fully integrated with AI.
The real question is whether he can convince the world to move away from a platform that has been trusted for over 20 years toward a new system powered by artificial intelligence.

Do you think Grokipedia can actually replace Wikipedia, or will it just become another one of Musk’s endless experiments?

#ElonMusk , #AI , #Grok , #Wikipedia , #technews

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Key points:

🔹 The Karnataka High Court dismissed X’s lawsuit against the Sahyog portal, which allows millions of police officers to request content removal.

🔹 X argues the system is a censorship tool without judicial oversight, threatening platforms with criminal liability if they fail to comply.

🔹 72 tech companies including Google, Apple, and Meta have joined Sahyog, but X refuses.

Elon Musk’s X has announced it will appeal a ruling by India’s High Court that upheld the government’s Sahyog system. The portal enables police across the country to demand removal of social media posts simply by declaring them illegal.
According to X, the mechanism operates without judicial review and provides no legal protection for users. Platforms that refuse to comply face potential criminal prosecution.

Modi’s government expands surveillance
Sahyog, launched in 2023, builds on India’s long-standing practice of using Section 69A of the Information Technology Act to block content on grounds such as national security or public order.
The new system, however, is based on Section 79, which allows platforms to lose legal protection if they fail to remove flagged content. Legal experts warn that courts have not yet reviewed this framework, allowing the government to bypass safeguards the Supreme Court previously required for Section 69A.

Who has joined – and who resists
At least 72 companies have registered with Sahyog, including WhatsApp, Telegram, Google, Apple, LinkedIn, and Snap.
X stands alone in refusing to participate, arguing that the portal acts as a “censorship gateway” where officials can arbitrarily remove posts without checks and balances.

Expert criticism
According to lawyer Mishi Choudhary from the Software Freedom Law Center, Sahyog marks a dangerous shift in India’s internet regulation:
“Granting such powers to police opens the door to unlimited censorship and undermines free speech.”
Her organization has also filed a constitutional petition with the Delhi High Court challenging the legality of Sahyog.

What’s at stake
The outcome of this case could shape how the internet is regulated in India — the world’s most populous country.
For Musk’s X, this is not just a legal dispute but part of a larger struggle between freedom of expression and an increasingly aggressive state control of online spaces.

#India , #ElonMusk , #technews , #X , #worldnews

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and a wave of tech visionaries are pouring billions into brain-computer interfaces (BCI). Their ambition goes far beyond medical breakthroughs — they’re racing to own the next digital platform: the neural bridge between human thought and technology.

The Neural Gateway to the Future
Musk is already reshaping the world with rockets, EVs, AI, and humanoid robots. Altman leads one of the most influential AI companies on the planet. Now both see their next frontier where human consciousness meets the digital realm.
For them, BCI is not just a medical device but a strategic gateway. Whoever controls this interface could one day dictate how humans interact with machines.

Musk and Neuralink
Musk founded Neuralink in 2016, arguing that merging with machines might be the only way to keep pace with artificial intelligence. The company recently raised $650 million and has already implanted devices in five patients, with the first able to browse the internet and control a cursor using thought alone.
Trials are expanding into speech disorders and vision restoration. Musk continues to frame BCI not only as a therapeutic tool but as a safeguard for humanity in an AI-driven future.

Altman and Merge Labs
Altman co-founded Merge Labs, seeking $250 million in funding at a potential valuation of $850 million. While Musk bets on invasive implants, Merge is exploring non-invasive BCI solutions — another path to link humans with digital systems.

Other Billionaire Backers
The circle extends further. Biohacker Bryan Johnson invested $100 million into Kernel back in 2016, building neurotech platforms to measure brain activity. Neuralink’s backers also include Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund, signaling that Silicon Valley sees BCI as the next layer of technological infrastructure.

The Double-Edged Sword of Billionaire Involvement
Experts argue that billionaire capital brings speed and visibility to the sector but also risks overpromising and concentrating power. If a single firm controls infrastructure and data, it effectively holds the “keys to human thoughts” — a chilling prospect for ethics and science alike.

Between Vision and Reality
For now, the reality of BCI is far more modest: fragile hardware, rough signals, and systems far from true “mind reading.” Companies like Synchron and Inbrain are advancing pilot programs, with Inbrain earning FDA “breakthrough device” designation. Yet mass-market adoption is still distant.

What’s at Stake?
For patients, BCI represents hope — the chance to restore lost abilities.For billionaires, it’s a strategic platform, where controlling the interface means controlling the rules of how thoughts become data.
This is not only a race of technology but a battle of visions — to decide who will define the future relationship between humans and machines.

#ElonMusk , #AI , #technews , #ArtificialInteligence , #INNOVATION

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“