I only post on Binance Square, X, and the TG group. All other platforms charge under false pretenses, please be cautious! Please recognize my account name ObaAgon, there are too many impersonators! ————————————————————— Explanation: Bullish: 'Define high point'. Bullish directional energy. Bullish main behavior dynamics; Bearish: 'Define low point'. Bearish directional energy. Bearish main behavior dynamics; Starting with the defined high point. Bullish directional dynamics, dynamics will have time dynamics, regardless of how bullish actions are made. Ultimately, it is for defining the high point. So if the bulls do not enter at the highest point, how can it be called a high point? ————————————————————— 'Event-driven, event occurrence rate is only 30%' For example, event bulls: Event bulls have event news, most people do not know that news events are going to happen, so before the event detonates, there will only be a short squeeze, and when the event occurs, there will be a direct spike. Event bulls only represent events, not bullish actions; simply stating event bulls means only events without bullish actions, which leads to only bearish actions. During the short squeeze process before the event occurs, if the event does not happen, the price may have already been declining throughout this process. ————————————————————— 'A high point' does not represent a high price. 'A low point' does not represent a low price. In terms of low points, the text is different from low prices. For example: low price low point, high price low point. Price and point are different things. ————————————————————— 'Build high point' 'Build low point' Bearish builders establishing low points is a dynamic process. Only the bearish can achieve the lowest point price; ordinary people do not have the capability to absorb large liquidity orders. Therefore, the establishment of a low point occurs after the bearish start placing orders; during this order placement period, a price low point will be produced. Before the bearish leaves, a low point will appear before moving to a high point. As time passes and comes to an end, the K-line price will show a V shape, moving from the top of V to the bottom of V and back to the tail of V, producing a process called building a low point.
Pi brothers, major AI update: In history, when AI problems shift from discussing prices, it’s either when things pivot to going long on Pi.
Now, since March 19, the issue of AI discussions about prices hasn’t changed.
And now on June 26, the AI issue for the first time has shifted. He’s not directly talking about prices, but it’s also not a constructive issue—it’s somewhere in between.
In the Pi Network project, we’re right in the midst of the AI boom, and Pi’s function is to let all users build the apps they want using AI on the Pi platform. This piece is gonna break down a topic that nobody’s talked about yet: What’s the deal with the Pi mobile mining feature? Is it really just a way to hand out cash? So, here’s the kicker: everyone in the global tech scene knows that banks are unlikely to give AI a financial identity. So, most folks are catching on to the fact that when AI gets fully integrated into everyday shopping, it’s gonna hit a snag because AI doesn’t have a financial identity to use. The common solution everyone’s aware of is that the best route for AI is through crypto identities.
🚀 Is MicroStrategy really just a massive and meticulously crafted financial pump?
🚀 Will a BTC crash force MicroStrategy to dump their Bitcoin? 🚀 Is it a death spiral or a cleverly designed exit strategy? 🚀 Is MicroStrategy really just a massive and meticulously crafted financial pump? Recently, there's been a strong panic narrative circulating in the market: As long as Bitcoin doesn't show significant gains over the long haul, MicroStrategy (MSTR) will be forced to liquidate Bitcoin due to cash flow issues, potentially triggering a 'death spiral.' The core logic behind this claim is: STRC and other preferred stocks need to regularly pay high cash dividends. Once BTC goes through a prolonged consolidation or downturn, MSTR's price gets pressured, making ATM fundraising difficult.
Looking back at BTC, as mentioned yesterday on the 21st at 10 PM, "The pullback should wrap up before midnight on the 22nd, then we need to kick off the rebound trading."
Now we can see BTC is starting to rally after a deliberate dip to fill some buy orders early this morning, and it's quickly moving upward. $BTC
ObaAgon
·
--
BTC from the article on the 17th explains and charts ABC, mentioning the fake double bottom we’re aiming for. Every time an event triggers, it’s to break the support line in front of us, "breaking A".
If breaking A doesn’t trigger retail traders to short, we’ll wait for the right moment, then "break B" – all of this refers to breaking A and B.
On the 18th at 1 PM, it started mentioning building a low point and indicated that it would accumulate in batches until 4 AM (on the 19th). The earlier mentioned second wave is breaking B. So just now, we saw breaking B during the time of building the low.
After breaking B, we didn’t even have to wait until 4, it ended early and bounced back.
Feel free to join my plaza group to check out the latest articles.
Some folks are saying that MicroStrategy is losing money, big time. Is that true?
I'd say, yeah, they're in the red, no doubt. But if you want to look at it that way, you could just claim that MicroStrategy is down five billion.
Because whether you're saying BTC is crashing down to ten grand or you think it's worth a dollar, and you reckon MicroStrategy is wiped out, it's all just your own take. Meanwhile, they haven't made any trades, and come Monday, they're still sitting on a five billion dragon.
So, what does the price even mean?
Looking back at history, does the price serve any purpose? Of course, it does.
There was a time when Binance had a data error, causing BTC to drop to 2706. At that moment, we could say it crashed to 2706, thinking MicroStrategy was about to blow up.
But did it blow up? Nope. An hour later, Binance corrected the data. At that point, everyone said it was just a data error, no point in discussing it.
Is that really the case? The truth is, your price is your concern; someone else's price is theirs. Reflecting on what happened at 2706, what was going on with other smaller exchanges?
As shown in the attached image, positions were completely liquidated, accounts that were in profit were forcibly frozen, and in the end, both long and short positions ended up losing.
What do we call this? That's your business. It's not about MicroStrategy losing money; come Monday, they still have a value of five billion.
Now, let me ask, what are those who are hyping that MicroStrategy is going to blow up at fifty grand even talking about?
Who cares what they're saying? They're trading on other people's capital and positions, using MicroStrategy's name to pull you in, just to eat your gains. They never claimed they could take down MicroStrategy because their goal is just to take you down. $BTC
BTC from the article on the 17th explains and charts ABC, mentioning the fake double bottom we’re aiming for. Every time an event triggers, it’s to break the support line in front of us, "breaking A".
If breaking A doesn’t trigger retail traders to short, we’ll wait for the right moment, then "break B" – all of this refers to breaking A and B.
On the 18th at 1 PM, it started mentioning building a low point and indicated that it would accumulate in batches until 4 AM (on the 19th). The earlier mentioned second wave is breaking B. So just now, we saw breaking B during the time of building the low.
After breaking B, we didn’t even have to wait until 4, it ended early and bounced back.
Feel free to join my plaza group to check out the latest articles.
$BTC #NFA (NFA, not financial advice)
ObaAgon
·
--
BTC has been on a continuous rebound since the 12th, and let's take a look back at the historical posts since the 18th:
In the previous discussion, we mentioned that the rebound peak would linger until the 15th before we start transitioning to a double bottom.
You can see that on the 15th at 11 PM, the price peaked and has been in a pullback since then.
On the 16th, we highlighted the early morning event on the 18th, and just now, the news about the dip has emerged on the 18th at dawn.
In the future, the main players will always release their strategies in advance, so please check the self-introduction explanation above. $BTC
June 24th is super special. Most folks look at price action to gauge these things, but that's not the whole picture.
There are loads of events around June 24th, and the three days before and after are event-packed. It's not just about the bullish or bearish events; it's more like a ritual.
This moment feels like some kind of ritual is unfolding.
What's this ritual about?
A ritual isn't just some religious display or performance as humans perceive it. In higher dimensions, it's about something happening, and the essence of the place, people, or things involved in the ritual gets transformed. $BTC
ObaAgon
·
--
What day is June 24th? June 24th is packed with events. June 24th marks the start of UFO sightings. Will anything special happen on this day? $BTC
MicroStrategy's Saylor mentioned mag8, what is mag8?
Mag8 is a term coined by MicroStrategy, similar to G7, referring to the top eight global corporations holding BTC, which collectively account for 25% of the total BTC supply.
This means that if global corporations want BTC, they can only fight over the remaining 75%.
But where is that 75%?
Let me tell you, MicroStrategy couldn't scoop it up at a low price, and you won't be able to either. $BTC
Looking back at the BTC history from the 10th to the 12th, you can see: on the 10th at 10 PM, it was mentioned that a continuous rebound would start on the 11th, and as of today, the 12th at 4 PM, it continues to be highlighted that the rebound will keep going, and a new high will be reached soon without breaking the peak.
And now we're seeing the price consistently hitting new highs in this rebound.
As for the future, the main players will announce their strategies in advance, so be sure to check out the self-introduction explanation above.
This article's designated role is 'Rebound Trader in the Barrier.'
Currently, the major players in the market include: 1. Rebound Traders in the Barrier/Fake Double Bottom Creators. 2. The previously mentioned June Mid Bullish Strategist. 3. Banks and crypto circles agreeing on a 60k range, indicating institutional accumulation. *It's recommended to categorize this article's role and bookmark it for tracking purposes.* $BTC
ObaAgon
·
--
Looking back at history, BTC was mentioned at 1 AM on the 10th, indicating that we were set for a double bottom, which turned out to be a fake (we'll know what was real in the future). Now, we can see that at 4 PM on the 10th, the price dropped to its lowest point.
Then, at 10 PM on the 10th, it was noted that the 11th would see another bounce, and currently, the price has returned close to that recent high during the rebound.
In the future, the main players will announce their plans in advance, so make sure to check out the self-introduction explanation above.
This article classifies its role as 'the rebound trader in the barrier'.
The main players currently in the market include: 1. The previously mentioned long traders from mid-June. 2. The agreement between banks and the crypto circle around the 60K barrier, indicating institutional accumulation. 3. The rebound traders in the barrier/fake double bottom creators. *This article will label its role classification, so please bookmark and track additions or removals based on categories.* $BTC
Looking back at history, BTC was mentioned at 1 AM on the 10th, indicating that we were set for a double bottom, which turned out to be a fake (we'll know what was real in the future). Now, we can see that at 4 PM on the 10th, the price dropped to its lowest point.
Then, at 10 PM on the 10th, it was noted that the 11th would see another bounce, and currently, the price has returned close to that recent high during the rebound.
In the future, the main players will announce their plans in advance, so make sure to check out the self-introduction explanation above.
This article classifies its role as 'the rebound trader in the barrier'.
The main players currently in the market include: 1. The previously mentioned long traders from mid-June. 2. The agreement between banks and the crypto circle around the 60K barrier, indicating institutional accumulation. 3. The rebound traders in the barrier/fake double bottom creators. *This article will label its role classification, so please bookmark and track additions or removals based on categories.* $BTC
SpaceX's largest IPO will also be the biggest short ever.
Historically, the internet has been flooded with so-called market cap theories, where they always use total market cap predictions that can't be surpassed.
With $1.77 trillion entering the game, liquidity at open will correspond to the stock price starting from that $1.77 trillion, raising a question:
After the initial $1.77 trillion, how can we attract another $1.77 trillion in new investments to boost the market cap to $3.54 trillion?
This also includes the original $1.77 trillion which will be sold off when the hype runs out.
These folks don’t care about the company's growth; they're just focused on how much they can make in the short term.
Therefore, the largest capital rotation in global history is about to explode. #spaceX
When trading BTC, a lot of negative thinkers love to analyze from a panic perspective.
Seeing MicroStrategy dump 32 BTC, they politically correctly assume that what was said before can't change, so they predict it's going to crash.
Or they use various calculations of interest payment times to determine how much cash MicroStrategy has to judge when it might go under.
This mindset belongs to one that uses negative emotions as its logic. It's like someone with severe depression sees everything in an extremely negative light, completely missing the positives.
Therefore, my view is that negative thinking isn't wrong; it's just a phase called the current state.
However, as a strategy executor, one shouldn't judge the ability to pay interest based on the current cash at hand.
Instead, they should think of ways to bring in more USD from external sources to cover interest payments, even methods that don't require using cash on hand.
Just like when Trump ran for president a second time, a negative current situation wouldn't prevent winning votes. Whether he wins or loses depends on the actions taken next.
So, for the negative commentators online, I believe it's not just about talking about how things will fail, but also discussing how many ways there are to create more USD for MicroStrategy.
Thus, given the current situation, the future is definitely not as described by the negative online commentary. Just from my own actions, I already know MicroStrategy has numerous ways to continue increasing USD.
There is absolutely no issue with interest pressure.
And now MicroStrategy has bought another 1550 BTC and added 100 million USD, which completely proves that the methods of negative commentary are all wrong. $BTC
On the 5th, I mentioned that BTC around 60 is a signal for a bottom and a potential bounce, and on the 7th, I pointed out that after 4 AM, we should expect a breakout on the bounce. This morning, we indeed saw that breakout.
Additionally, as mentioned earlier, the bounce should reach the evening of the 8th.
However, we are already seeing the bounce hit the evening of the 8th.
Feel free to join my group chat for future articles $BTC
ObaAgon
·
--
BTC, as mentioned earlier, it was time to trade the rebound between 4 AM and 8 AM on the 7th, and now we can see it has happened.
The drop at 6 AM was a tactical move by those looking to short the market, deliberately eating up some of the lower bid orders to increase liquidity and create additional sell pressure on BTC, before going in with market buys to trigger a rebound all the way up.
Feel free to join my group chat for future updates $BTC