Ethereum

🗓️ Updated: July 2025 | By Noob to Pro Trader

Ethereum, jisko crypto world ka “smart contract king” kaha jata hai, is waqt aik aise point pe khara hai jahan breakout bhi ho sakta hai… ya breakdown bhi. ETH ne $2,520 support regain kiya hai, lekin $2,580–$2,600 resistance zone abhi tak toot nahi raha.

Is article me aapko milega:

✅ Real-time chart analysis
✅ Trendline aur support-resistance breakdown
✅ Indicators ka signal
✅ Aur woh levels jahan breakout ya breakdown confirm ho sakta hai

---

📈 Ethereum Price Snapshot – Bulls vs Bears

🔹 ETH ne $2,520 ke upar bounce liya
🔹 Lekin price abhi bhi $2,550 ke neeche aur 100-hour SMA ke neeche trade kar raha hai
🔹 Hourly chart pe aik positive trendline bani hui hai jiska support $2,530 ke aas paas hai
🔹 Breakout ke liye $2,580–$2,600 ka todna zaroori hai

---

📐 Technical View – Chart Kya Keh Raha Hai?

🔸 Fibonacci Levels Analysis

ETH ne $2,636 swing high se $2,475 low tak ke fall ka 61.8% Fib level break kiya tha (bullish signal).
Lekin 76.4% Fib level ($2,600) pe price reject ho gaya — yaani wahan se selling pressure aya.

Ab price phir se $2,520–$2,550 zone me consolidate kar raha hai.

---

🚀 Bullish Scenario – Agar ETH $2,600 Break Kar Le

Agar Ethereum $2,580 aur phir $2,600 clean break kar leta hai, toh next targets ho sakte hain:

🎯 $2,650 – short-term target
🎯 $2,720 – bullish momentum continuation
🎯 $2,800 – strong rally zone
🎯 Ultra-bulls even $2,880 tak ka target de rahe hain agar ETF ya DeFi ka news aya

📌 Confirmation tab milega jab ETH daily ya hourly candle $2,600 ke upar close kare with volume.

---

⚠️ Bearish Scenario – Agar ETH Fail Kar Gaya

Agar ETH $2,580 ya $2,600 break nahi kar pata:

🔻 $2,520 – pehla support
🔻 $2,500 – psychological aur technical support
🔻 $2,450 – lower support
🔻 $2,350 – deeper correction zone
🔻 $2,320 – last critical support before panic zone

📉 Is case me bearish pressure intense ho sakta hai, especially agar Bitcoin bhi weak ho.

---

📊 Indicators Kya Bol Rahe Hain?

MACD: Negative side pe momentum barhta hua nazar aa raha hai

RSI: Below 50 hai — yaani na oversold, na bullish

100-hour SMA: ETH iske neeche hai — short-term bearish signal

---

🧭 Kya Dekhna Chahiye Ab?

🔍 $2,520–$2,530: Short-term must-hold support
🔍 $2,580–$2,600: Crucial breakout resistance
🔍 $2,500: Breakdown confirmation
🔍 Volume spikes: Watch volume on Binance, Bybit
🔍 BTC ka move: Ethereum often follows BTC

---

✅ Final Verdict: ETH Ki Game Shuru Hone Wali Hai?

Ethereum tight zone me phase hua hai — jahan dono sides pe powerful moves aa sakte hain.

Agar aap ETH hold kar rahe ho: 🔹 $2,500 ka level nazar me rakho
🔹 Stop-loss use karo
🔹 $2,600 breakout pe alert raho

Agar buy karne ka plan hai: 🔹 Confirmed breakout ke baad entry safe hogi
🔹 Indicators ka signal zaroor dekhein

---

📢 "Breakout ka wait patience mangta hai, aur panic sell sirf regret deta hai." – Noob to Pro Trader

🔁 Share karo is article ko apne crypto doston ke sath
📍 Daily ETH & BTC updates ke liye follow zaroor karo

#Ethereum #noobtoprotrader $ETH #AltcoinUpdate #ETHPrice #CryptoTrading

#Ethereum
#AltcoinETFsWatch
Follow
Like
Share

The proposal aims to enforce a maximum limit of 16.77 million gas for any single transaction, nearly half of the 30 million gas limit proposed in EIP 7825. This limit, according to Buterin and Wahrstätter, will be applicable irrespective of the block gas limit set by miners or validators.

Implementation of this proposal will see transactions specifying a gas limit above 16.77 million gas get invalidated. This means that during transaction validation, transactions exceeding the gas limit will be rejected and excluded from the transaction pool. Similarly, during block validation, any block that contains a transaction that exceeds the set gas limit will become invalid.

Buterin and Wahrstätter’s chosen 16.77 million gas limit will provide a “balance between allowing complex transactions while maintaining predictable execution bounds,” as per the proposal. The authors added:

“This value enables most current use cases, including contract deployments and advanced DeFi interactions, while ensuring consistent performance characteristics.”

When implemented, the proposal will require users and decentralized applications (dApps) to split transactions with higher gas limits into smaller operations. However, Buterin and Wahrstätter expect the limit to impact a minimal number of users and dApps since most current transactions fall well below the proposed limit.

Why setting a transaction gas limit matters
Ethereum’s current architecture allows transactions to theoretically consume the entire gas limit of a block. This architecture carries several risks.
For instance, allowing a single transaction to consume most or all of the block gas limit can make it easier for miscreants to execute DoS attacks. In DoS attacks, bad actors try to overwhelm a network through a barrage of spam transactions. This causes the network to fail to provide service to genuine users.

According to the proposal, the absence of a transaction gas limit can also lead to uneven load distribution and affect network stability.

Having variable gas usage can also cause an imbalance in load distribution across transactions in a block. Furthermore, high-gas transactions also cause longer block verification times, which can impact user experience.

Benefits of setting a transaction gas limit
According to Buterin and Wahrstätter, limiting the gas usage limit of single transactions can help reduce the risk of single-transaction DoS attacks. Essentially, the limit will set a guardrail that prevents malicious actors from using the network’s bandwidth through large spam transactions.

The limit would also ensure that gas is allocated fairly across transactions in a block, the proposal stated. The cap is also expected to make the validation of blocks “more predictable and uniform.”

The most important benefit, however, would be enhanced compatibility with zero-knowledge virtual machines (zkVMs). Encouraging transactions with hefty gas limits to be broken up into smaller chunks “allows better participation in distributed proving systems,” and enables “more predictable zkVM circuit design,” the proposal stated.