Cross-chain compatibility isn't glamorous. It's plumbing. But the developers who understand the plumbing are always the ones who build the most durable things.
A zero-cost opcode for destroying contracts was always going to attract abuse eventually. 5000 energy is a small tax that prevents a lot of bad behavior
Most developers don't think about SELFDESTRUCT until they have to. After Proposal 106, they're going to start thinking about it upfront. Better that way
On-chain governance working as it should. A proposal goes in, the network votes, behavior changes. That's the whole promise of decentralization actually running.
If your smart contract relied on SELFDESTRUCT for cleanup logic, now is a great time to rethink your architecture. Honestly, it probably needed rethinking anyway
Aligning TRON's EVM behavior with Ethereum isn't just a technical upgrade. It's a statement that interoperability is the long game. @Justin Sun孙宇晨 @TRON DAO #TRONEcoStar
Melde dich an, um weitere Inhalte zu entdecken
Krypto-Nutzer weltweit auf Binance Square kennenlernen
⚡️ Bleib in Sachen Krypto stets am Puls.
💬 Die weltgrößte Kryptobörse vertraut darauf.
👍 Erhalte verlässliche Einblicke von verifizierten Creators.