I used to think PropAMMs were mostly a Solana native advantage.
Fast blocks, cheap updates, constant quote refreshes.
That environment made active liquidity feel natural.
But the more I look at @GeniusOfficial the more I think Solana was only the proof stage, not the end stage.
Because speed alone is not the whole story.
A PropAMM wins when professional liquidity can keep quotes fresh, tighten spreads, and defend inventory without getting picked off by stale state execution. Solana showed that this model works.
But local success is still local success.
The bigger capital base, deeper stablecoin liquidity, broader user surface, and stronger composability still sit inside the EVM world. That is where the scale question becomes more serious.
This is why Genius feels important to me.
It is not just saying PropAMMs are good.
It is pushing the harder thesis: can active market making logic that proved itself on Solana be rebuilt for EVM in a way that actually scales global flow?
That is a much more aggressive move.
Because if Genius can combine PropAMM efficiency with EVM distribution, then the model stops competing inside one fast chain and starts competing for a much larger liquidity universe.
For me, that is the real shift.
Solana proved the design.
Genius is testing whether EVM is where that design becomes dominant.
Can Genius make PropAMMs scale globally through EVM?