USA

U.S.-China relations are once again on the brink, just weeks after the two powers reached a trade ceasefire in May. Now, Beijing is accusing Washington of serious violations of the deal and is warning of decisive retaliation if the U.S. doesn’t change course.

💣 Trade Truce Falling Apart
China’s Ministry of Commerce announced Monday that the U.S. had breached the Geneva Agreement reached in May, which was intended to cool tensions after the imposition of tariffs as high as 145%.
Beijing is now making it clear: if the U.S. continues its "discriminatory restrictions," China is ready to take strong and decisive action.

🧪 Rare Earths as a Strategic Weapon
One major flashpoint is the export of rare earth materials — essential components for chipmaking, batteries, and military technologies. The Trump administration had hoped the May agreement would ease China’s export restrictions, but Beijing continues to delay export approvals.
U.S. factories are now warning of potential production halts, while China blames the U.S. for escalating tensions by:

🔹 issuing new sanctions against Huawei,

🔹 banning chip-design software exports to Chinese firms,

🔹 and revoking student visas for Chinese nationals.
“If the U.S. continues to undermine our interests, we will take strong and decisive measures,” China’s Ministry of Commerce stated.

📞 Trump Wants to Talk to Xi Jlnping – But Beijing Stays Silent
Trump has repeatedly said he wants to resolve the situation through direct talks with President Xi Jlnping, but no call has taken place yet.
Experts say China’s diplomatic protocol requires consensus at lower levels before any high-level engagement. Meanwhile, confusion is growing within the White House, with some advisors citing lack of coordination following a major reshuffle in the National Security Council.

🛡️ Military Tensions Fuel the Fire
Tensions were further inflamed after U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth delivered a sharp speech at the Shangri-La Dialogue summit in Singapore, calling Chinese military actions in the Indo-Pacific region a “real and immediate threat.”
China quickly responded by:

🔹 skipping the summit entirely — the first time since 2019,

🔹 releasing an official statement calling the U.S. “the biggest threat to regional peace,”

🔹 and accusing Hegseth of “promoting Cold War thinking.”

💬 Reader question: Are the U.S. and China on the verge of a full-blown trade war? And how could this impact the global economy?

#china , #usa , #TradeWars , #Geopolitics , #TradingCommunity

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Tensions between China and the United States are once again rising—this time sparked by comments from U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at the Shangri-La Dialogue security forum in Singapore. In his speech, Hegseth labeled China as a threat to regional stability in the Indo-Pacific, prompting a sharp rebuke from Beijing.

🔹 China Accuses U.S. of Provocation and Global Hegemony

Chinese Defense Ministry spokesperson Zhang Xiaokang accused the U.S. of sowing discord, provoking confrontation, and pursuing selfish interests. He warned that if the U.S. continues down this path, it will have to face the consequences.
The statement came shortly after Hegseth publicly criticized Beijing for not sending its defense minister to the forum—a break from tradition that left China absent from key military diplomacy with global powers.

Taiwan at the Center of the Dispute
In a separate response, China’s Foreign Ministry called the U.S. “the world’s true hegemonic power”, saying it is the main destabilizing force in the Asia-Pacific region. The ministry also warned Washington to “stop playing with fire” over Taiwan, after Hegseth remarked that a confrontation over the island “could be imminent.”
This year’s forum broke with past norms, as China did not open Sunday’s session with its usual high-ranking military representative. Instead, Vice Admiral Hu Kangfeng, vice president of the National Defense University, avoided addressing the absence of Defense Minister Dong Jun.
“It’s standard protocol for us to send delegations at various levels. It doesn’t affect our ability to explain our defense policy or engage in communication,” Hu stated.

Lower Visibility and Harsh Rhetoric Beyond the Forum
China’s presence at this year’s event was clearly more subdued. Unlike in 2024, when the delegation held press briefings and student-led roundtables, no such public events were held this year.
Chinese Ambassador to New Zealand Wang Xiaolong joined the criticism, posting on X that Hegseth’s remarks amounted to fearmongering and saber-rattling.
“If this isn’t fear-mongering, then what is?” he said. “It’s wishful thinking to believe many in the region will accept such self-centered and delusional rhetoric.”

Embassy Statements Target Hegseth and Macron
The Chinese Embassy in Singapore issued two strongly worded Facebook posts.

🔹 One targeted French President Emmanuel Macron for comparing the West’s response to the war in Ukraine with a potential crisis in Taiwan, calling the analogy “unacceptable.”

🔹 The other criticized Hegseth for “smearing and attacking China” and pushing the narrative of a so-called “China threat.”
“In reality, the U.S. is the biggest disruptor of peace and stability in the region,” the embassy stated.

Such public criticism of the Shangri-La Dialogue from Chinese diplomats is rare, as they usually remain behind the scenes coordinating logistics for the military delegation.

Rare Exchange Between Chinese and U.S. Officials
During one of the forum’s few direct confrontations, Senior Colonel Zhang Chi from the National Defense University asked Hegseth how the U.S. would prioritize allies over Southeast Asian countries, considering many of its security frameworks exclude ASEAN members.
It was one of the rare moments when a Chinese official openly challenged U.S. policy during the forum.

#chinavsusa , #Geopolitics , #worldnews , #USPolitics , #usa

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Поки світ думає, що у США все ще борються за демократію, там потайки пхають закон про стейблкоїни під кодовою назвою GENIUS (ні, це не псевдонім Маска, і не новий мемкойн з TikTok). За словами репортерки FOX Business Елеонор Террет, поки на публіку ллють воду про голосування щодо посадовця Пентагону, справжнє шоу йде за лаштунками — республіканці хочуть протиснути цей закон по-тихому, без зайвих криків і процедурних "танців з бубном".
👨‍⚖️ Сенатори, озброєні правками та еспресо, мріють досягти "угоди про одностайну згоду", щоб швидко і без суперечок прийняти GENIUS, — ну бо ж це так геніально, правда? Ідея проста: дати США закон про стейблкоїни, щоб не виглядати повними динозаврами на фоні МСГД Китай-Євросоюз.
---
🧠 Що це означає реально?
GENIUS — це спроба врятувати обличчя після років криптобалагану: фіктивні стейбли, рекламні обіцянки прибутку, обмани з "резервами". Закон забороняє "хитру рекламу", змушує емітентів проходити аудит, звітувати і не кидати інвесторів на бабки.
💡 Але є нюанс: GENIUS — не стільки про прозорість, як про концентрацію влади, адже:
🔹 Всі великі гравці отримають "дозвіл на життя",
🔹 Дрібним стартапам буде важко відповідати вимогам,
🔹 Держава готується монополізувати довіру — тільки "наші" стейблкоїни, тільки схвалені нами резерви.
---
🎯 Висновок?
GENIUS — це як нова зачіска старої системи: виглядає свіжо, але під нею той самий мозок. Якщо закон пройде, то:
✅ Ринок стейблкоїнів у США отримає нарешті легальну рамку,
✅ Криптобіржі зможуть менше боятися SEC,
❌ Але децентралізації стане менше,
❌ І буде тиск на альтернативні стейбли (типу DAI чи FRAX).
Це ще не кінець гри, але рубіж може бути переломним. GENIUS може стати або панацеєю для крипторинку, або новим "Патріотичним актом" — тільки в блокчейні. ⛓️🇺🇸
🪙 А поки що тримай свої стейбли близько… а фіат ще ближче. І ні, GENIUS не спасе тебе від ринку, що падає.
#GENIUS #usa #USACryptoTrends #SaylorBTCPurchase $BTC $ETH $WCT