lisacook

تواجه قيادة البنك المركزي الأمريكي معركة قانونية غير مسبوقة. فقد رفعت ليزا كوك، محافظة الاحتياطي الفيدرالي، دعوى قضائية ضد الرئيس دونالد ترامب، الذي حاول عزلها من منصبه على خلفية مزاعم احتيال في الرهن العقاري. ويأتي هذا النزاع في وقت بالغ الحساسية، قبل أسابيع فقط من اجتماع لجنة السوق المفتوحة الفيدرالية (FOMC) في سبتمبر/أيلول، حيث من المتوقع على نطاق واسع أن يخفض الاحتياطي الفيدرالي أسعار الفائدة.

دعوى قضائية ضد الرئيس
وفقًا لوثائق المحكمة، تسعى كوك إلى تدخل قضائي فوري لتأكيد تفويضها كمحافظة في مجلس الاحتياطي الفيدرالي ومنع قرار ترامب بعزلها. كما وردت أسماء مسؤولين كبار آخرين في مجلس الاحتياطي الفيدرالي، بمن فيهم رئيس المجلس جيروم باول، في القضية.

The U.S. Court of Appeals has issued a historic ruling – blocking President Donald Trump’s attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. This decision not only secures her position but also reaffirms the independence of the central bank, which has not faced such direct political pressure since its founding in 1913.

Legal Battle Over Fed Independence
Trump sought to dismiss Cook over old allegations tied to a 2021 mortgage application – filed before her appointment to the Fed in 2022. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2–1 that the president had no legal grounds for such action. By law, Fed governors can only be removed “for cause,” such as serious misconduct or inability to perform their duties.
Judges Bradley Garcia and Michelle Childs emphasized that Cook had been denied due process – she was never served a complaint nor given the chance to defend herself. Trump-appointed Judge Gregory Katsas dissented, warning that limiting presidential power too much could weaken accountability of the nation’s most powerful financial institution.

Impact on the Fed and Global Markets
The decision comes at a critical time – just days before a key FOMC meeting, where officials are expected to cut interest rates for the first time in more than a decade. Pressure on the Fed has been mounting amid slowing economic growth, a weaker labor market, and global inflationary pressures.
Had Trump succeeded, he could have appointed his own candidate, securing control over four of the Fed’s seven board seats. This would have marked a dramatic shift in monetary policy, potentially pushing faster and more aggressive rate cuts – a move that might boost markets in the short term but risk higher inflation.

What the Ruling Means for Investors
Analysts say the verdict is a vital signal to both domestic and international markets. It shows the Federal Reserve remains independent, with monetary policy driven by economic indicators rather than political influence. This stability is critical for maintaining confidence in the U.S. dollar and the broader financial system.
Lisa Cook, who has consistently denied the allegations, celebrates both a personal and professional victory. Her legal team welcomed the ruling, stressing that an unlawful dismissal could have shaken investor confidence, destabilized markets, and undermined trust in central bank independence.

What Comes Next?
The legal battle may not be over. The Department of Justice could still ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case. If so, the ruling could have far-reaching consequences for how much power a president holds over the central bank – and, by extension, the U.S. economy.
For now, the message is clear: the Fed has preserved its independence at a time when financial stability matters more than ever.

#LisaCook , #Fed , #TRUMP , #USPolitics , #FederalReserve

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

اهتز العالم المالي عندما أصدرت محافظ الاحتياطي الفيدرالي ليزا كوك بيانًا جريئًا ردًا على تعليقات من الرئيس ترامب. أعلنت كوك بحزم أن الرئيس ليس لديه "سلطة إقالتها"، مشددة على أنها ستواصل أداء واجباتها كصانعة سياسة مستقلة في البنك المركزي الأمريكي.
🔹 ماذا حدث؟
على مدار الأسبوع الماضي، تصاعد التوتر السياسي بين البيت الأبيض والاحتياطي الفيدرالي. كان الرئيس ترامب ناقدًا علنيًا لسياسات الاحتياطي الفيدرالي وقد تساءل عن استقلالية بعض المحافظين. في ردها، أصدرت ليزا كوك، التي تم تعيينها في مجلس محافظي الاحتياطي الفيدرالي في عام 2022، رسالة قوية من التحدي.

Tensions between the White House and the Federal Reserve are escalating. Fed Governor Lisa Cook told the U.S. Supreme Court that if President Donald Trump were allowed to remove her, it would trigger a collapse of financial markets and cause irreparable damage to the independence of the U.S. central bank.

Dispute Over Mortgage Fraud Allegations
Trump’s team is pushing to oust Cook over alleged irregularities in her mortgage applications. Her lawyers argue that the accusations are legally insufficient and do not meet the statutory standards under the Federal Reserve Act. In a Thursday filing, they warned that her immediate dismissal could spark “chaos and legal uncertainty,” potentially leading to a scenario in which two different candidates compete for the same Fed seat at the same time.
The Department of Justice already petitioned on September 18 for the Supreme Court to overturn a lower court decision that blocked Trump from acting. Yet two lower courts — Judge Jia Cobb and later the D.C. Court of Appeals — upheld the block, ruling that the White House’s case did not meet the legal threshold.

Warnings from Former Fed Chairs and Treasury Officials
Prominent economists have joined the defense of Cook’s position. Former Fed Chairs Ben Bernanke, Alan Greenspan, and Janet Yellen issued a joint letter warning that removing Cook would set a historic precedent and seriously undermine public trust in the Fed’s independence. The letter was also signed by former Treasury Secretaries Larry Summers, Robert Rubin, Jacob Lew, and Henry Paulson, as well as former IMF chief economist Kenneth Rogoff.
They emphasized that allowing the removal of a sitting member of the Board of Governors would turn the Fed into a political tool and jeopardize the long-term stability of the U.S. economy.

Trump Pushes Case Directly to the Supreme Court
Despite previous rulings, Trump’s legal team bypassed the usual process and escalated the dispute straight to the Supreme Court. Their goal is to have the block lifted immediately, so that Cook can be removed even before the full case is heard. Her legal team has warned this could create an absurd situation in which Trump nominates a replacement while Cook is still officially in her position.

Cook Continues Her Work
In spite of mounting political pressure, Lisa Cook continues to perform her duties at the Fed. At the most recent meeting, she voted in favor of a 25 basis point interest rate cut. She has made it clear that she will not step down voluntarily and has no intention of resigning from her role.

#LisaCook , #Fed , #TRUMP ,#USPolitics , #economy

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Donald Trump has escalated his legal fight by asking the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington to overturn a lower court’s decision that blocked his attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. The request, filed Thursday through the Department of Justice, seeks an emergency suspension of the ruling issued by Judge Jia Cobb.

Time Pressure Ahead of Fed Meeting
Trump is demanding that the court issue a temporary stay by Monday, just one day before the Fed’s crucial meeting on interest rates. If Judge Cobb’s ruling stands, Cook would still participate. If suspended, her removal would take effect immediately.
The Department of Justice argued that the president has the right to dismiss Fed governors for “misconduct,” citing allegations of mortgage fraud involving Cook in three U.S. states.

Dispute Over Trump’s Method of Dismissal
Judge Cobb, however, questioned Trump’s procedure — instead of following standard protocol, he announced the dismissal through a social media post. Cobb said this likely denied Cook her due process rights and that the allegations may not qualify as sufficient legal grounds for removal under Fed rules.
The accusations stem from 2021–2022, when Cook allegedly declared multiple properties in Michigan, Georgia, and Massachusetts as her “primary residence” to secure better mortgage terms.

Political Tensions Ahead of the Fed Decision
Trump’s administration insists that removing Cook would strengthen the Fed’s integrity. If the appeals court rules against him, the White House is prepared to escalate the case directly to the Supreme Court.
Cook has not spoken publicly about the case but previously described Trump’s effort as a “politically motivated attack” that could undermine public trust in the Fed and pose long-term risks to economic stability.

What’s Next?
The three-judge appeals panel will decide whether to grant the stay. If approved, Cook’s removal would take effect immediately, even before the broader legal battle concludes. Such emergency measures are granted only if judges believe the appeal has a strong chance of success and that Trump would suffer “irreparable harm” without it.
👉 The timing is critical: the decision comes just days before the Fed sets its next interest rate policy, adding fresh uncertainty to the financial markets.

#TRUMP , #FederalReserve , #LisaCook , #USPolitics , #economy

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

الرئيس الأمريكي دونالد ترامب يزيد من تصعيد صراعه مع الاحتياطي الفيدرالي، حيث يأخذ المعركة إلى المحكمة العليا. stakes هو ليس أقل من محاولته لتأمين تأثير الأغلبية على البنك المركزي وإعادة تشكيل مسار السياسة النقدية الأمريكية.

التماس ترامب: أوقفوا ليزا كوك
قدمت وزارة العدل، التي تعمل نيابة عن ترامب، التماسًا تطلب من المحكمة العليا تعليق الحكم الذي سمح لليزا كوك بالبقاء كحاكمة للاحتياطي الفيدرالي.
يجادل ترامب بأنه أزالها بشكل قانوني بسبب اتهامات بالاحتيال في الرهن العقاري - وهي أسباب يقول إنها صالحة بموجب قانون الاحتياطي الفيدرالي. ومع ذلك، أعاد المحكمة الجزئية كوك، ورفضت محكمة الاستئناف بعد ذلك طلب ترامب لإيقاف هذا القرار.

إقالة الرئيس ترامب لمحافظ الاحتياطي الفيدرالي تثير نقاشًا حول بيتكوين واستقلالية البنوك المركزية
أدت الإقالة غير المسبوقة للرئيس دونالد ترامب لمحافظ الاحتياطي الفيدرالي في أغسطس 2025 إلى إعادة إشعال النقاشات حول استقلالية البنوك المركزية ودور العملات اللامركزية مثل بيتكوين. أثارت إقالة كوك، التي أُطُرَت على أنها مرتبطة بسوء السلوك، مخاوف بشأن الدوافع السياسية في ظل الخطاب الاستبدادي، مما يتحدى الفهم التقليدي لاستقلال الاحتياطي الفيدرالي عن الضغوط السياسية. سلطت هذه الخطوة الضوء على التوتر بين النفوذ السياسي والاستقلال النقدي، مما أثار نقاشات حول دور البدائل اللامركزية مثل بيتكوين.