CZBİNANCE

You've heard the term "CeDeFi" thrown around a lot lately.
At BounceBit, it’s not a marketing slogan;
it’s our fundamental architectural principle. So, what does it actually mean It’s the conscious,
deliberate fusion of the best parts of Centralized Finance (CeFi) and Decentralized Finance (DeFi).
On the CeFi side, we leverage the security, compliance, and familiarity of regulated custodians to hold the underlying assets. This provides an iron-clad foundation of trust.
On the DeFi side, we have a transparent, on-chain, permissionless network where all transactions, staking, and yield generation occur.
This provides unparalleled transparency and user control.
The magic happens in the synergy. The CeFi backbone ensures the asset security that institutions require, while the DeFi engine ensures that the yield generation is open, fair, and accessible to everyone.
This hybrid model directly addresses the core failures of previous cycles—the opaque lending and the rug pulls.
With BounceBit, you know where your assets are, you know how your yield is generated, and you control your funds on-chain.
We’re taking the guardrails of traditional finance and combining them with the open highway of decentralization.
That’s the CeDeFi promise, delivered.
#BouncebitClubs #bouncebit #BTC走势分析 #Binance #CZBİNANCE
@BounceBit
$BB

Binance founder Changpeng “CZ” Zhao is preparing to take legal action against U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren. He accuses her of defamation after she allegedly made false statements about his criminal case. This dispute began when Warren claimed on social media that Zhao pleaded guilty to money laundering, a statement his legal team says is completely untrue.
Reports indicate that Zhao’s attorney, Teresa Goody Guillen, has written a formal demand letter asking Warren to retract her statement or face a lawsuit. The controversy began with Warren’s October 23 post on X, where she stated that “CZ pleaded guilty to a criminal money laundering charge and was sentenced to prison.” Zhao never admitted guilt to money laundering. He instead pleaded guilty to a violation of the Bank Secrecy Act. He acknowledged failing to keep proper anti-money laundering controls, which is a different legal issue.
After President Donald Trump recently pardoned Zhao, Warren’s comments sparked fierce debate in both political and crypto circles. The X Community Notes feature quickly marked her post as inaccurate, supporting Zhao’s legal team’s claims that her statement was misleading and harmful.
Attorney Guillen argues that Warren’s remarks do not fall under the protections offered by the Speech or Debate Clause. This clause protects lawmakers for statements made in official congressional settings. “Mr. Zhao will not remain silent while a United States Senator misuses her platform to publish false and defamatory statements,” Guillen wrote in the letter. She emphasized that social media posts are not protected like Senate floor speeches.
This latest clash shows a deeper, ongoing conflict between Warren and the digital asset industry. The Massachusetts senator has been one of the most vocal critics of cryptocurrencies. She often raises concerns over consumer protection, illicit finance, and market manipulation. Her strong stance often puts her at odds with industry leaders and policymakers who favor lighter regulation.
After Trump’s pardon of Zhao, Warren and Rep. Adam Schiff introduced a resolution condemning the decision as an act of “corruption.” This move highlighted her ongoing commitment to holding crypto leaders accountable under U.S. law.
For Zhao, this dispute is more than just a personal defense; it signifies a broader statement about misinformation and reputation in the global digital finance arena. He has already served a four-month prison sentence and paid a $50 million fine as part of a larger $4.3 billion settlement with U.S. authorities. Despite his legal troubles, Zhao remains a key player in the crypto world and continues to significantly influence the industry’s development.
As tensions rise, legal experts say this case could set an important precedent regarding whether elected officials can be held liable for statements made outside their official roles. The outcome could change how public figures discuss sensitive legal and regulatory issues in the most scrutinized sector of the digital economy.
#CZBİNANCE #Binance #CryptoNews

Binance ຈະກັບຄືນຄອງບັນລັງອີກຄັ້ງບໍ?
CZ ປ່ຽນໂປຣໄຟລ໌ກັບມາເປັນ “Binance” ຫຼັງໄດ້ຮັບອະໄພໂທດຈາກ Donald Trump ຫຼັງຈາກ Changpeng “CZ” Zhao ຜູ້ກໍ່ຕັ້ງ Binance ໄດ້ຮັບອະໄພໂທດຈາກປະທານາທິບໍດີ Donald Trump ໃນມື້ວັນພະຫັດທີ່ຜ່ານມາ, ກະແສຂ່າວລື່ເລື່ອງ “ການກັບຄືນຂອງ Binance ສູ່ຕະຫຼາດສະຫະລັດ” ກໍ່ຖືກຈຸດຂຶ້ນອີກຄັ້ງ.

CZ ໄດ້ໂພສໃນ X (Twitter ເກົ່າ) ວ່າ:
“ຂ້ອຍຈະເຮັດທຸກວິທີເພື່ອໃຫ້ອາເມລິກາເປັນສູນກາງຂອງໂລກຄຣິບໂຕ ແລະຜັກດັນ Web3 ໃຫ້ເຕີບໃຫຍ່ໄປທົ່ວໂລກ”
ພ້ອມກັນນັ້ນ CZ ກໍ່ໄດ້ປ່ຽນ Bio ໃນໂປຣໄຟລ໌ຈາກຄໍາວ່າ “ex-Binance” ກັບມາເປັນ “Binance” ອີກຄັ້ງ.
ສື່ Bloomberg ລາຍງານວ່າ ນີ້ແມ່ນສັນຍານສໍາຄັນທີ່ອາດຊີ້ໃຫ້ເຫັນວ່າ CZ ອາດຈະກັບມາມີບົດບາດໃນບໍລິສັດອີກຄັ້ງ.
ນັກລົງທຶນເຫັນວ່າ ອະໄພໂທດໃຫ້ CZ ແມ່ນຈຸດປ່ຽນສໍາຄັນ
David Namdar CEO ຂອງ BNB Network Company ກ່າວວ່າ
“ການໄດ້ຮັບອະໄພໂທດຂອງ CZ ບໍ່ແມ່ນແຕ່ຈຸດປ່ຽນສໍາລັບຕົວເຂົາເອງ ແຕ່ເປັນຈຸດປ່ຽນຂອງ Binance ແລະ BNB ດ້ວຍ.”
ພວກເຂົາເຊື່ອວ່າການກັບມາຂອງ CZ ອາດຊ່ວຍເຮັດໃຫ້ Binance ຂະຫຍາຍເຂົ້າຕະຫຼາດສະຫະລັດໄດ້ຫຼາຍຂຶ້ນ ແລະດຶງນັກລົງທຶນອາເມລິກາກັບມາສູ່ແພລດຟອມທີ່ໃຫຍ່ທີ່ສຸດໃນໂລກ ໂດຍສະເພາະໃນເວລາທີ່ BNB ກໍ່ສ້າງສະຖິຕິລາຄາໃໝ່ສູງສຸດໃນເດືອນຕຸລານີ້.
ອະດີດແລະປັດຈຸບັນ: Binance.US ເຄີຍແຍກອອກເພື່ອປະຕິບັດຕາມກົດໝາຍ
ໃນປີ 2019, Binance ໄດ້ແຍກອອກເປັນ Binance.US ເພື່ອໃຫ້ສອດຄ່ອງກັບກົດໝາຍຂອງສະຫະລັດ.
ບໍລິສັດລູກນີ້ດໍາເນີນໂດຍ BAM Trading Services, ຊຶ່ງບໍ່ມີສິດເຂົ້າເຖິງສະພາບ liquidity ຫຼືຕະຫຼາດອະນຸພັນ (derivatives) ເຊັ່ນໃນແພລດຟອມຫຼັກ.
ຖ້າ Binance ສາມາດກັບເຂົ້າຕະຫຼາດສະຫະລັດໄດ້ຈິງ ນັ້ນອາດໝາຍເຖິງ “ຍຸກໃໝ່ຂອງການເທຣດຄຣິບໂຕໃນອາເມລິກາ” ທີ່ນັກລົງທຶນລາຍຍ່ອຍຈະໄດ້ເຂົ້າເຖິງສະພາບຄລິກວິດລະດັບໂລກອີກຄັ້ງ.
ຝ່າຍການເມືອງຍັງແບ່ງອອກເປັນສອງຝັ່ງ
ເຖິງແມ່ນວ່າປະທານາທິບໍດີ Donald Trump ຈະອະທິບາຍວ່າ CZ “ໄດ້ຮັບຄໍາແນະນໍາໃຫ້ພິຈາລະນາອະໄພໂທດຈາກຜູ້ໃນວົງການຄຣິບໂຕຈໍານວນຫຼາຍ” ແລະຍືນຢັນວ່າ “ຫຼາຍຄົນກ່າວວ່າເຂົາບໍ່ໄດ້ທໍາຜິດ,”
ແຕ່ຝ່າຍນັກການເມືອງພັກດີໂມແຄຣດກັບອອກມາຄັດຄ້ານຢ່າງຮຸນແຮງ.
ໂດຍສະເພາະ Maxine Waters ແລະ Elizabeth Warren ທີ່ອອກແຖງການປະນາມວ່າ
“ນີ້ແມ່ນການເມືອງແບບ Pay-to-Play” ແລະກ່າວຫາວ່າອຸດສາຫະກໍາຄຣິບໂຕ “ກໍາລັງຄວບຄຸມທຣັມຢູ່ເບື້ອງຫຼັງ.”
CZ ຕອບກັບ Warren: “ບໍ່ມີຂໍ້ຫາຟອກເງິນ!”
ຫຼັງຈາກ Warren ກ່າວຫາວ່າ CZ “ສາລະພາບຜິດໃນຂໍ້ຫາຟອກເງິນ” CZ ກໍ່ໂພສຕອບກັບໃນ X ທັນທີວ່າ:
“ບໍ່ມີຂໍ້ຫາຟອກເງິນໃດໆເລີຍ!”
CZ ຢ້ຳວ່າ ເຂົາຮັບຜິດຊອບຕໍ່ຂໍ້ຫາຝ່າຝືນ Bank Secrecy Act ເນື່ອງຈາກ Binance ຍັງບໍ່ມີລະບົບ AML (Anti-Money Laundering) ທີ່ເຂັ້ມງວດພໍ ແຕ່ບໍ່ແມ່ນການຟອກເງິນຢ່າງທີ່ຖືກກ່າວຫາ.
ສະຫຼຸບ: Binance ກໍາລັງຈະກັບຄືນບັນລັງບໍ?
ການໄດ້ຮັບອະໄພໂທດຂອງ CZ ບໍ່ພຽງແຕ່ປຸກຄວາມເຊື່ອມັ່ນໃນຊຸມຊົນ Binance ກັບຄືນມາ ແຕ່ຍັງອາດເປັນ “ກ້າວທໍາອິດໃນການກັບຄືນ” ຂອງ Binance ສູ່ຕະຫຼາດສະຫະລັດ.
ຖ້າເຫດການນີ້ເກີດຂຶ້ນຈິງ ມັນອາດຈະເປັນການປ່ຽນແປງຄັ້ງໃຫຍ່ທີ່ສຸດໃນໂລກຄຣິບໂຕໃນປີ 2025,
ເພາະວ່ານີ້ບໍ່ແມ່ນແຕ່ການກັບຄືນຂອງ Binance — ແຕ່ແມ່ນການກັບຄືນຂອງ “ຍຸກທີ່ອາເມລິກາເປັນສູນກາງຂອງໂລກຄຣິບໂຕ” ອີກຄັ້ງ.
ອ້າງອີງ: cointelegraph.com
#CZBİNANCE