USD1 by Trump's WLF is the fastest growing stablecoin.
At the top 5, USD1 overtook FDUSD and PayPal's USD.
Interestingly, of its $2.15B supply, $2B comes from an investment by MGX, an Abu Dhabi-state-backed company, into Binance, which used USD1 for the transaction.
In essence, Binance -owns- $2b of USD1, linking it closely with WLF.
There's little discussion on the implications this has for crypto.
The real challenge is to keep growing. We need to see use cases built for USD1.
Or maybe the real use case and source for growth is its connections with Trump, leading crypto businesses to adopt it for preferential treatment from the Trump admin.
-> Be a savvy BD/sales or marketing professional with some industry rep -> Join a growing crypto protocol pre-TGE -> Get locked tokens -> Work until TGE and a bit after to secure tokens -> Quit & join another pre-TGE project
Takes a few years. But less luck needed than gambling on memecoins.
Zero-to-One innovation is my top reason for focusing on a narrative.
But it's not enough.
Runes tokens on Bitcoin were one of my top picks for this bull run, yet I'm down badly in % terms from ATH.
I hear... $DOG trading at a $444M MC isn't a failure. But by itself, $DOG accounts for 80% of the entire Runes market size.
$PUPS is down by 99%. Others not much better.
"Runes were built for degens and memecoins." - Rune creator said.
Indeed, they started strong:
It was fun learning how etch (mint) new tokens, community vibes were great but degens are rekt and 'artisanal shitcoining' isn't delightful anymore.
I'm curious about the reasons for the lack of hype, as understanding them will improve our skills in evaluating future narratives.
On top of my list:
- Bitcoin is slow and expensive. Degens want to know if they lost or made money ASAP.
- For whales, the liquidity is too thin. There is no AMM type LP pools.
- Low volumes + technical difficulties -> CEX unwilling to list
- Big learning curve; Easier to swap memecoins on Phantom/Solana than Runes
But there's another fundamental difference: Bitcoiners are hardcore, and crucially, passive holders. Despite $2T MC of BTC, little of it went to Runes.
It's a lesson for anyone building on Bitcoin
Even for me, BTC serves as a store of value. It stays in cold wallets or multisig. It's not for speculative activities.
Still, Babylon, a restaking protocol on Bitcoin, quietly reached the top 9 DeFi protocols with TVL of $4.9 billion.
That's more than Uniswap of $4.89b!
It shows that yield, not degen memecoin gambling is the top use case for BTC.
Yet's still early and changing Bitcoiners' behavior is a big challenge, especially as more BTC flows to ETFs instead of staying in self-hosted wallets.
But I will not bury Runes just yet. The community isn't dead but Runes need a catalyst to pump again.
Focusing on increasing liquidity and improving UX/UI infra should be a priority.
InfoFi is transforming CT into a KOL-to-KOL platform.
Scrolling through X for the last 10 days without posting left me feeling sidelined, as the InfoFi meta awards mindshare. Without mindshare, this meta completely overlooks you.
I also feel there's less actionable insight on CT than a few years ago.
I recommend spending more time reading crypto research, and crypto blogs for better noise-to-insight ratio.
I usually avoid FUD, but my experience with Loopscale was awful.
• Instantly lost 10% to slippage with PT-fragSOL/SOL 5x loop. The UI doesn't warn about this. • My jupSOL/SOL principal decreased despite a high APY shown.
I usually avoid FUD, but my experience with Loopscale was awful.
• Instantly lost 10% to slippage with PT-fragSOL/SOL 5x loop. The UI doesn't warn about this risk. • My jupSOL/SOL principal decreased despite a high APY shown.